Skip to main content

Mites Predaceous on Pests of Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1360 Accesses

Abstract

Because of their small size and cryptic appearance, mites are difficult to detect and hence in most cases their role in nature is overlooked. The role of parasitic mites in reducing the population of honeybees (producer of honey) is well known. The role of predaceous mites particularly of family Phytoseiidae is also of great economic importance as regards management of spider mites on field crops and in fruit orchards. Associations of different mite species and their economic relevance on houseflies, mosquitoes, grasshoppers/locusts, scale insects, whiteflies, psylla, thrips, caddisflies, collembolans, cockroaches, bark beetles, stored grain beetles, moths and butterflies are discussed. Mite associations on snails and slugs, symphylans, nematodes and earthworms and their economic impact are also discussed. Predaceous mites belonging to mite families Acaridae, Acarophenacidae, Anystidae, Arrenuridae, Ascidae, Bdellidae, Cheyletidae, Cunaxidae, Limnesidae, Parasitidae, Pygmephoridae, Pterygosomatidae, Tarsonemidae and Uropodidae are reported associated with insect pests of agriculture in different habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Branson DH (2003) Effects of a parasite mite on life-history variation in two grasshopper species. Evol Ecol Res 5:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Housewart MW, Jennings DT, Brekett LP, Brann TB (1980) Parasitic mites (Acari Erythraeidae) on spruce budworm moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can Entomol 112:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggans JL, Blickenstaff CC (1996) Parasites and predators of predators in Missouri, Reserch Bulletin 903, University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station. University of Mossouri, Columbia, 40 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter PE, Rosario RMT (1988) Associations of Mesostigmata with other arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 33:393–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist EE (1967) Mites parasitizing eggs of bark beetles of the genus Ips. Can Entomol 96:125–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist EE (1969) Mites and the regulations of bark beetles. In: Proceeding 2nd International Congress Acarology, 1967, pp 389–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon EP, Joshi S, Hussain M, Ramamurthy VV (2011) A new species of Hemipteroseius (Acari: Otopheidomenidae) parasitic on Dysdercus (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae) in India. Zootaxa 2800:53–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohansundaram M, Parmeshwaran S (1989) Mites infesting the grasshoppers occurring in different ecosystems in Coimbatore. J Biol Control 9:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser JC (1975) Mite predators of the southern pine beetle. Ann Entomol Soc Am 68:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaraju K, Mohansundaram M (1996) New species of Podapolipus, Podapolpides and Tarsopolipus (Acari: Podapoliidae) from South India. Int J Acarol 22:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees NE (1973) Arthropod and nematode parasites, parasitoids, and predators of Acarididae in America North of Mexico, Technical Bulletin No. 1460. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research service, Washington, DC, p 228

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley RL (1966) Further descriptions of two erythraeids predaceous upon cotton bollworm eggs. Proc Environ Soc Wash 68:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BP (1988) Host-parasite interaction and impact of larval water mites on insects. Annu Rev Entomol 33:393–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith IM, Oliver DR (1986) Review of parasitic associations of larval water mites (Acari: Parasitengona: Hydrachinidia) with insect hosts. Can Entomol 118:407–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrk FA, Phillips SM (2009) A monograph of the slug mite – Riccardoella limacum (Schrank). Proc Zool Soc London 115:448–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treat AE (1975) Mites of moths and butterflies. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 362 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth WW (1997) A review of the pathogens and parasites of the biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J Wash Acad Sci 67:60–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyoski M, Cohen M (1983) Mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) as predators of the Japanese bayberry whitefly, Parabemisia myricae Kuwana (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Agronomie 3:823–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

Electronic References (ER)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dhooria, M.S. (2016). Mites Predaceous on Pests of Agriculture. In: Fundamentals of Applied Acarology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1594-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics