Skip to main content

Meritocracy, Education Opportunities and Social Stratification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education, Meritocracy and Inequality in China
  • 2403 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the first step in linking the philosophical origin and theoretical standpoints of meritocracy to the contemporary higher education selection in China. Chapter 2 chronicles the origin and development of the civil service examination in the imperial China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is no official data that documents the distinction between key/model schools and normal schools. With an exception of Shandong province, secondary schools are categorised as key/model status or non-key/model status.

  2. 2.

    Different thresholds for different types of universities were published by the Ministry of Education at the provincial level annually after the Gaokao. Each university then published their detailed reports on their enrolment data, particularly cut-off points for each fields of study.

  3. 3.

    The best academic performance is understood as the highest thresholds of the Gaokao. The highest thresholds in the 2006 Gaokao are those who obtained more than 560 points out of total 750. The thresholds for those candidates who chose Arts and Humanities were slightly lower than those who chose Natural Sciences. The highest thresholds are understood as cut-off points for Tier 1 and Tier 2 universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ye Liu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, Y. (2016). Meritocracy, Education Opportunities and Social Stratification. In: Higher Education, Meritocracy and Inequality in China. Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1588-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1588-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1586-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1588-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics