Advertisement

The Effect of Government Suicide Prevention Programs

  • Yasuyuki Sawada
  • Michiko Ueda
  • Tetsuya Matsubayashi
Chapter
Part of the Economy and Social Inclusion book series (ESI)

Abstract

Suicide poses a serious challenge on all modern societies and governments are expected to play a major role in its prevention. The previous two chapters showed that policy choices of the government have a crucial influence on the risk of suicide among the population. Yet our measures of policy choices, such as government partisanship in Chap.  7 and economic and welfare policies in Chap.  8, are not a direct and immediate suicide prevention effort. They were hypothesized to affect the lives of vulnerable population in society and thus their suicidal risks.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Finn Gjertsen for informing us of an error in our analysis in the analysis reported in the second section of this chapter.

References

  1. Ajdacic-Gross, V., Weiss, M. G., Ring, M., Hepp, U., Bopp, M., Gutzwiller, F., et al. (2008). Methods of suicide: International suicide patters derived from the WHO mortality database. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 726–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, M., & Jenkins, R. (2005). The challenge of suicide prevention: An overview of national strategies. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 13, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, J., & McPhedran, S. (2006). Gun laws and sudden death: Did the Australian firearms legislation of 1996 make a difference? British Journal of Criminology, 47, 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Francis, Castles, & Mair, P. (1984). Left-right political scales: some ‘expert’ judgements. European Journal of Political Research, 12, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, S., Alpers, P., Agho, K., & Jones, M. (2006). Australia’s 1996 gun law reforms: Faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings. Injury Prevention, 12, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Leo, D. (2002). Struggling against suicide. Crisis, 23, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Leo, D., & Evans, R. (2003). International Suicide Rates: Recent trends and implications for Australia. Technical report, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.Google Scholar
  9. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2002). The determination of unemployment benefits. Journal of Labor Economics, 20, 404–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dumesnil, H., & Verger, P. (2009). Public awareness campaigns about depression and suicide: a review. Psychiatric Services, 60, 1203–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2009). Penn World Table Version 6.3. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/phpsite/pwt63/pwt63form.php.
  13. Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Japan Support Center for Suicide Countermeasures. (2008). Report on Suicide Prevention Programs by Prefectures and Major Cities.Google Scholar
  15. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mann, J. J., et al. (2005). Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. Journal of American Medical Association, 294, 2064–2074.Google Scholar
  17. Minoiu, C., & Andres, A. R. (2008). The effect of public spending on suicide: Evidence from U.S. state data. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95, 939–952.Google Scholar
  19. Solt, F. (2009). Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Swank, D. H. (2010). Comparative parties data set. http://www.marquette.edu/polisci/documents/part19502006.xls.
  21. Taylor, S. J., Kingdom, D., & Jenkins, R. (1997). How are nations trying to prevent suicide? An analysis of national suicide prevention strategies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 95, 457–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). OECD Stat Extracts. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx.
  23. United Nations. (1996). Prevention of Suicide: Guidelines for the Formulation and Implementation of National Strategies. New York: U.N. Department of Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  24. World Health Organization (2011). Suicide prevention. http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/.
  25. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen (2002). Suicide Prevention in Europe: The WHO European monitoring survey on national suicide prevention programmes and strategies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuyuki Sawada
    • 1
  • Michiko Ueda
    • 2
  • Tetsuya Matsubayashi
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsThe University of TokyoBunkyō, TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Political Science and EconomicsWaseda UniversityShinjukuJapan
  3. 3.Osaka School of International Public PolicyOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan

Personalised recommendations