Advertisement

Infrageneric Classification of Amaranths

  • Saubhik Das
Chapter

Abstract

The infrageneric classification of Amaranthus is not clearly resolved due to wide range of morphological variability, large numbers of synonyms, and misapplication of names. According to the generally accepted concept, the genus comprises three subgenera – subgen. Acnida (including dioecious species), subgen. Amaranthus and subgen. Albersia. Monoecious grain amaranths are included in the subgen. Amaranthus and vegetable amaranths are included in subgen Albersia. Taxonomic delimitation in vegetable amaranths particularly those included in sect. Pyxidium of Albersia is ambiguous. Polyphyletic nature of subgen. Acnida challenges the 3-part classification of Amaranthus.

Keywords

Pistillate Flower Dioecious Species Phylogenetic Affinity Terminal Inflorescence Style Branch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aellen P (1959) Amaranthus L. In: Hegi G (ed) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, 2nd edn., vol 3, Part 2. Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, pp 465–516Google Scholar
  2. Beck G (1909) Reichenb. Icon. Fl. Germanicae et Helveticae 24:182Google Scholar
  3. Britton NL, Brown A (1913) An illustrated flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British possessions. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Carretero JL (1985) Consideraciones sobre las amarantaceas ibericas. An Jard Bot Madr 41(2):271–286Google Scholar
  5. Covas G (1992) Clove para la identification de los amarantes cultivados y cspecies silvestres utilizable como hortalizas o forrajeras: 9–12. – Amarantos, novedades e informaciones no. 12. Fac de Agronomia, INTA Anguil. Santa Rosa, La Pampa. –ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  6. Das S (2014) Amaranthus parganensis (Amaranthaceae), a new species from West Bengal, India. Novon 23:406–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Candolle AP (1849) Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regin Vegetabilis 13(2):262Google Scholar
  8. Dumortier B-CJ (1827) Florula Belgica, operis majoris prodromus auctore. Casterman, TourneyGoogle Scholar
  9. Feine-Dudley LB (1980) A provisional key some edible species of the family Amaranthaceae. In: Grubben GJH, van Sloten DH (eds) Genetic resources of Amaranths. The International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, pp 35–47Google Scholar
  10. Grenier JCM, Godron DA (1856) Flore de France 3. Savy, F, Paris, p 779Google Scholar
  11. Hanelt P (1968) Beitrage zur Kulturpflanzen-Flora I: Bemerkungen zur Syatematik and Anbaugeschichte einiger Amaranthus-Arten. Kulturpflanze 16:127–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hauptli H, Jain SK (1978) Biosystematics and agronomic potential of some weedy and cultivate amaranths. Theor Appl Genet 52:177–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hitchcock AS, Green ML (1929) Standard species of Linnaean genera of Phanerogamae. In: International botanical congress, Cambridge 1930, Nomenclature prepared by British botanists, London, pp 110–199Google Scholar
  14. Hunziker AT (1965) Estudios sobre Amaranthus. V. Revisión de las especies americanas con 1–4 estambres, 1 a 5 tépalos, e inflorescencias exclusivamente axilares. Kurtziana 2:27–52Google Scholar
  15. Joshi BD (1981a) Exploration for amaranth in North-West India. Plant genetic resources news letter no. 48. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp 41–52Google Scholar
  16. Joshi BD (1981b) Catalogue on amaranth germplasm. Regional Station, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR), Phagli, Shimla,171004, India, p 42Google Scholar
  17. Kowal T (1954) Cechy morfologiczne I anatomicznenasion rodzaju Amaranthus L. oraz klucze do ich oznaczania. Monogr Bot (Warszawa):170–193Google Scholar
  18. Kunth KS (1838) Flora Berolinensis 2. Duncker et Humbolt, Berlin, p 438Google Scholar
  19. Linnaeus C (1753) Species plantarum 2. Salvius, Stockholm, p 1200Google Scholar
  20. Moquin-Tandon CHBA (1849) Amaranthaceae. In: De Candolle A (ed) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 13, vol 2. Paris, pp 231–424Google Scholar
  21. Mosyakin SL, Robertson KR (1996) New infrageneric taxa and combination in Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae). Ann Bot Fenn 33:275–281Google Scholar
  22. Mosyakin SL, Robertson KR (2003) Amaranthus Linnaeus. In: Flora of North America editorial committee (ed) Flora of North America. North of Mexico, vol 4: Magnoliophyta, Caryophillidae, Part I. Oxford University Press, New York pp 410–435Google Scholar
  23. Murray MJ (1940) The genetics of sex determination in the family Amaranthaceae. Genetics 25:409–431PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Pratt DB, Clark LG (2001) Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus– one species or two? J Torrey Bot Soc 128:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robertson KR (1981) The genera of Amaranthaceae in the Southeastern United states. J Arnold Arbor 62:267–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanchez-Del Pino I, Olvera HF, Valdes J (1999) La familia Amaranthaceae en la flora halofila gipsofila de Mexico. Anales del Instuto de Biologia de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Botanica 70:29–135Google Scholar
  27. Sauer JD (1950) The grain amaranths. A survey of their history & classification. Ann Mo Bot Gard 37:561–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sauer JD (1955) Revision of the dioecious amaranths. Madrono 13:5–46Google Scholar
  29. Sauer JD (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sauer JD (1967) The grain amaranths and their relatives: a revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann Mo Bot Gard 54:103–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sauer JD (1972) The dioecious amaranths: a new species name and major range extension. Madrono 21:425–434Google Scholar
  32. Sauer JD (1976) Grain amaranths. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. London, pp 4–7Google Scholar
  33. Sauer JD (1993) Amaranthaceae: Amaranth family. In: Historical geography of crop plants. Boca Raton, p 9–14Google Scholar
  34. Schinz H (1934) Amaranthaceae. In Engler and Prantal Di-cnatonrlichen Pflanzen familien, vol 160, pp 7–85Google Scholar
  35. Thellung A (1914) Amaranthus. In: Ascherson P, Graebner P (eds) Synopsis der Mitteleuropaischen Flora 5(1). Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 225–356Google Scholar
  36. Thellung A (1919) Beitrage zur Adventivflora der Schweiz 3. Vierteljahrsschr Natrforsch Ges Zurich 64:684–815Google Scholar
  37. Trucco F, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL et al (2005a) Amaranthus hybridus can be pollinated frequently by A. tuberculatus under field conditions. Heredity 94:64–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Trucco F, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL et al (2005b) Promiscuity in weedy amaranths: high frequency of female tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) × smooth pigweed (A. hybridus) hybridization under field conditions. Weed Sci 53:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trucco F, Tatum T, Rayburn AL et al (2009) Out of the swamp: unidirectional hybridization with weedy species may explain the prevalence of Amaranthus tuberculatus as a weed. New Phytol 184:819–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wassom JJ, Tranel PJ (2005) Amplified fragment length polymorphism-based genetic relationship among weedy weedy Amaranthus species. J Hered 96:410–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saubhik Das
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyTaki Government CollegeTakiIndia

Personalised recommendations