Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Mathematics Learning: What Are We Doing?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2012-2015

Abstract

During this review period it is evident that Australasia is in need of a research agenda that critically analyses the impact and use of national external and international assessments, as well as issues related to classroom-based assessment. Although these are investigated at many levels, the question remains: Are we assessing what we really need to assess? Issues remain in relation to what national and international testing reports to the community, as well as validity issues around how it is used, and accountability. In addition, school-based assessment includes assessment “of”, “as”, and “for” learning with pockets of research applying a fine-grained review. The role that technology plays in classrooms and large-scale assessments is worthy of continued exploration in the light of available and changing tools. Assessment in the mathematics classroom has the potential to alter the experiences of children in our schools at every level. This chapter provides a balanced review and critique of research related to assessment completed within the timeframe of this review. The authors position the discussion in the context of current agendas and consider the impact the mathematics education community has had to date, and the future potential of the community to inform assessment practices and wider discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) (cat. no. 4228.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013a). NAPLAN: Results and reports. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/test-results.html.

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013b). National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: Achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy. National report for 2014. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/NAPLAN_2013_technical_report.pdf.

  • Buckingham, J. (2014, August 21). NAPLAN: IQ versus poverty. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/naplan-iq-versus-poverty/story-e6frg6zo-1227031184390.

  • Callingham, R. (2011). Issues for the assessment and measurement of statistical understanding in a technology-rich environment. Technology in Statistics Education, 5(1), 11pp. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qr2p70t.

  • Carmichael, C., MacDonald, A., & McFarland, L. (2014). Predictors of numeracy performance in national testing programs: Insights from the longitudinal study of Australian children. British Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 617–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman, J., & McDonough, A. (2013). Using photographs and diagrams to test young children’s mass thinking. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 146–153). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. P. (2013). Posing problems to understand children’s learning of fractions. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 162–169). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., Page, S., & Thornton, S. (2013). Designing tasks to promote and assess mathematical transfer in primary school children. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 194–201). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., & Goff, W. (2013). Noticing young children’s mathematical strengths and agency. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, P., Wake, G., & Hoyes, A. (2012). Assessing “functionality” in school mathematics examinations: What does being human have to do with it? Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgasz, H., & Hill, J. C. (2013). Factors implicated in high mathematics achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, K., & Makar, K. (2012). Assessing for learning in inquiry mathematics. Paper Presented in Topic Study Group 33: Assessment and testing in mathematics education at The Twelfth International Congress of Mathematics Education, Seoul, Korea. Retrieved from http://www.icme12.org/upload/UpFile2/TSG/1155.pdf.

  • Gable, A., & Lingard, B. (2013). NAPLAN and the performance regime in Australian schooling. A review of the policy context (UQ Social Policy Unit Research paper no. 5). Brisbane: The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I., & Tout, D. (2014). Comparison of PIAAC and PISA Frameworks for Numeracy and Mathematical Literacy (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 102). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5jz3wl63cs6f-en.

  • Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2014). The role of digital technologies in numeracy teaching and learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1115–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, P., & Hunter, J. (2015, August 5). One-size-fits-all is past its NAPLAN use-by date. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://grattan.edu.au/news/targeted-teaching-needed-to-correct-naplan-failings/.

  • Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, &. E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2013). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess middle-years students’ proportional reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. Y., & Lowrie, T. (2014). The model method: Students’ performance and its effectiveness. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Aye, K. M., Loo, S. K., … Luo, W. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R., & Perso, T. (2012). Equity and the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon, (Eds.), Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics – Perspectives from the field (pp. 115–133). Online Publication: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/sites/default/files/editor/books/1/Chapter%206%20Jorgensen.pdf.

  • Langrall, C., Nisbet, S., Mooney, E., & Jansem, S. (2011). The role of context expertise when comparing data. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. (2012). Mathematics for all? The case for and against national testing. Regular Lecture Presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seoul, Korea. Retrieved from http://www.icme12.org/sub/sub02_04.asp.

  • Lim, P., Gemici, S., & Karmel, T. (2013). The impact of school academic quality on low socioeconomic status students. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth. Adelaide, SA: National Council for Vocational Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., Lowrie, T., & Diezmann, C. M. (2014). Co-thought gestures: Supporting students to successfully navigate map tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2015). The role of test-mode effect: Implications for assessment practices and item design. In C. Vistro-Yu (Ed.), In pursuit of quality mathematics for all. Proceedings of the 7th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 649–656). Cebu, Philippines: Philippine Council of Mathematics Teacher Educators (MATHTED), Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., Diezmann, C. M., & Logan, T. (2012). A framework for mathematics graphical tasks: The influence of the graphic element on student sense making. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., Ramful, A., Logan, T., & Ho, S. Y. (2014). Do students solve graphic tasks with spatial demands differently in digital form?. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (Vol. 2, pp. 429–436). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A., & Carmichael, C. (2014). A snapshot of young children’s mathematical competencies: Results from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 381–388). Sunshine Coast, QLD: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, K. (2012). The development of an assessment tool: Student knowledge of the concept of place value. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng,& S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 481–488). Singapore: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. (2015). Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Review of Education, 41(1), 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, T., McMurchy-Pilkington, C., & Trinick, T. (2012). Indigenous students and the learning of mathematics. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008–2011 (pp. 67–87). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushin, I., Gardner, R., & Munro, J. (2013). Language matters in demonstrations of understanding in early years mathematics assessment. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papic, M. (2015). An early mathematical patterning assessment: Identifying young Australian indigenous children’s patterning skills. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 519–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papic, M. M., Mulligan, J. T., Highfield, K., McKay-Tempest, J., & Garrett, D. (2015). The impact of a patterns and early algebra program on children in transition to school in Australian indigenous communities. In B. Perry, A. MacDonald, & A. Gervasoni (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 217–236). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinnell, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Cracking the language code: NAPLAN numeracy tests in years 7 and 9. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(1), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (2012). Steps in developing a quality whole number place value assessment for years 3-6: Unmasking the “Experts”. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 648–655). Singapore: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (2013). Entering the “New Frontier” of mathematics assessment: Designing and trialling the PVAT-O (online). In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 586–593). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P., & Zoumboulis, S. (2015). Using multiple choice questions to identify and address misconceptions in the mathematics classroom. In N. Davis, K. Manuel, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Mathematics: Learn, lead, link. Proceedings of the 25th Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (pp. 112–120). Adelaide, SA: AAMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, R. G. (2012). Indigenous early school leavers: Failure, risk and high-stakes testing. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (2013). Bringing research on students’ understanding into the classroom through formative assessment. In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 13–21). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K., Price, B. & Steinle, V. (2012). Identifying stages in a learning hierarchy for use in formative assessment – the example of line graphs. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Singapore: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate-McCutcheon, S., & Drake, M. (2015). The individual basic facts assessment tool. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 587–594). Sunshine Coast, QLD: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013a). PISA in brief. Highlights from the full Australian report: PISA 2012: How Australia measures up. The PISA 2012 assessment of students’ mathematical, scientific and reading literacy, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013b). PISA 2012: How Australia measures up. The PISA 2012 assessment of students’ mathematical, scientific and reading literacy, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vista, A. (2013). The role of reading comprehension in maths achievement growth: Investigating the magnitude and mechanism of the mediating effect on maths achievement in Australian classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., Chick, H., & Callingham, R. (2014). Average: The juxtaposition of procedure and context. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 477–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P., & Anderson, J. (2012). Pressure to perform: Reviewing the use of data through professional learning conversations. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., & Hornsby, D. (2012). Inappropriate uses of NAPLAN results. In J. Cashen, D. Hornsby, M. Hyde, G. Latham, C. Semple, & L. Wilson (Eds.), Say No to NAPLAN. Set 1 (n.p.). Retrieved from http://www.literacyeducators.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/naplan-papers-set-1.pdf.

  • Wyn, J., Turnbull, M., & Grimshaw, L. (2014). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Sydney: Whitlam Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New England, Armidale, Australia

    Penelope Serow

  2. University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

    Rosemary Callingham

  3. Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Australia

    David Tout

Authors
  1. Penelope Serow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosemary Callingham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Tout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penelope Serow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Katie Makar

  2. Fac of Sci, Health, Edu & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia

    Shelley Dole

  3. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Jana Visnovska

  4. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Merrilyn Goos

  5. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Anne Bennison

  6. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Kym Fry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serow, P., Callingham, R., Tout, D. (2016). Assessment of Mathematics Learning: What Are We Doing?. In: Makar, K., Dole, S., Visnovska, J., Goos, M., Bennison, A., Fry, K. (eds) Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2012-2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1417-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1419-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation