Skip to main content

Exploring the Reciprocal Benefits of Community-University Engagement Through PACE

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Through Community Engagement

Abstract

Multiple understandings of reciprocity inform and underscore diverse ways of engaging in community-university partnerships. Although the benefits to students of such engagement are relatively well-documented in the literature (Eyler J, Giles DE, Jr. Stenson CM, Gray CJ, At a glance: what we know about the effects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993–2000, 3rd edn. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 2001; Tryon and Stoecker, J High Educ Outreach Engage 12(3):47–59, 2008), little empirical research currently supports claims that programs and partnerships result in reciprocal learning and engagement opportunities, especially from the perspective of community partners. This chapter conducts a preliminary empirical inquiry into the diverse ways reciprocity manifests as benefits for key stakeholders in the PACE context, taking the analytical framework proposed by Dostilio et al. (Mich J Commun Serv Learn 19(1):17–32, 2012), and Hammersley’s (2016) favourable critique of it as primary points of departure. We draw on the reflections and perceptions of a range of staff, students, and partners involved in PACE activities in local, regional and international settings and identify, organise and articulate some of the diversity and complexity of the relationships that exist within the PACE program and the beneficial outcomes it has spawned for different stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some of the PACE research projects that the authors are involved with are included in Table 16.1 below.

References

  • Butterwick, S. (2011). Travels with feminist community-based research: Reflections on social location, class relations, and negotiating reciprocity. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds.), Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies (pp. 58–74). Vancouver: UBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, R. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations for international service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, A. (2013) Personal communication. PACE International Partner Perspectives project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostilio, L. D., Brackmann, S. M., Edwards, K. E., Harrison, B., Kliewer, B. W., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19(1), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about the effects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993–2000 (3rd ed.). Nashville: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, D. (2013) Personal communication, Cochlear Host supervisor, 8 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, L. (2015). “It’s about dignity not dependency": Reciprocal relationships in undergraduate community-based service-learning. Doctoral dissertation, North Ryde: Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, L. A., Bilous, R. H., James, S. W., Trau, A. M., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2014). Challenging ideals of reciprocity in undergraduate teaching: The unexpected benefits of unpredictable cross-cultural fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(2), 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, U. (2014). Virtual partnerships: Implications for mediated intercultural dialogue in a student led online project. In S. Hope Culver & P. Kerr (Eds.), MILID yearbook global citizenship in a digital world (pp. 177–190). Gothenborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E., Paris, C. M., & Blache-Cohen, B. (2014). Fair trade learning: Ethical standards for community-engaged international volunteer tourism. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14(1–2), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleliszek, M. (2013). Personal Communication, PACE student, 23 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, N., & Saltmarsh, J. (2011). New lines of inquiry in reframing international service-learning into global service-learning. In R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, & S. G. Jones (Eds.), International service-learning: Conceptual frameworks and research (pp. 69–85). Sterling: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D., May, D. L., Duchane, K. A., Coulter-Kern, R., Bryant, D., Morris, P. V., Pomery, J. G., & Bellner, M. (2006). A logic model service-learning: Tensions and issues for further consideration (pp. 47–60). Spring: Michigan Journal of Service Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie University. (2014a). Discover the path to your future. North Ryde: Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie University. (2014b). Marketing PACE: A framing of futures. North Ryde: Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie University. (2014c). PACE research and evaluation strategy 2014–2016, North Ryde: Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiter, S., Simich, L., Jacobson, N., & Wise, J. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 6(3), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, F. (2014). Restless development. Australian Volunteers International Magazine, Summer 2013/14, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, S. (2008). Who is serving whom? Partners, process, and products in service-learning projects in South African urban geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(2), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PACE student 2 and 5. (2011). Personal communication. ENVG380 student feedback survey, Department of Environment and Geography, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaits, V. (2013). Personal Communication PACE Student, 11 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, E., & Stoecker, R. (2008). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(3), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Lloyd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lloyd, K. et al. (2017). Exploring the Reciprocal Benefits of Community-University Engagement Through PACE. In: Sachs, J., Clark, L. (eds) Learning Through Community Engagement. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0997-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0999-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics