Skip to main content

Reflection for Learning: A Holistic Approach to Disrupting the Text

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Through Community Engagement

Abstract

Reflective practice can support a mindful and focussed approach to deep learning, enabling the bridging between theory and the students’ learning experience. This practice can range from creative pursuits to heeding felt knowing, integrated into the curricula to support praxis. Indeed, the embedding of reflective mechanism(s) is a requirement of learning through participation known as PACE (Professional and Community Engagement), a pillar of the undergraduate curriculum, and core to the university’s new vision. Through this curriculum requirement and a number of fora extending beyond PACE, Australia’s Macquarie University engages with diverse reflective practices including digital storytelling and art. This chapter presents the holistic approach adopted to integrate reflective practice mechanisms across PACE curricula and practice. Firstly, the role of reflection for learning through participation (LTP) is established. The approach taken to achieve a holistic approach to practice is then unpacked. This holistic approach recognises the need to scaffold and embed reflective practice at, and across, many levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2010, Fall). An Australian perspective on undergraduate research. CUR Quarterly, 31(1), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service-learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons, 77(4), 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. L. (1997). Impediments to reflective practice: Toward a new agenda for research on teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 3(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, D., & Harvey, M. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, D., Harvey, M., Winchester‐Seeto, T., & Mackaway, J. (2010). Exploring the evidence for the role of reflection for learning through participation. In M. Campbell (Ed.), Work integrated learning – Responding to challenges: Proceedings of the 2010 ACEN 2010 National Conference (pp. 92–103). Perth, September 29–October 1, 2010. http://www.acen.edu.au/conferences/archive/ACEN-2010-Proceedings.pdf

  • deFreitas, E. (2007). Research fictions: Arts-informed narratives that disrupt the authority of the text. Interchange, 38(4), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning: A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. (2013). So you think you are doing action research? Indicators of enactment of participatory action research in higher education. ALARj (Action Learning and Action Research Journal), 19(1), 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. (2014). Strengths-based approach. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopaedia of action research (Vol. 2, pp. 732–735). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., Baker, M., Bosanquet, A., Coulson, D., Semple, A., & Warren, V. (2012). Moving beyond the diary: Innovation in design and delivery of reflection. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACEN collaborative education: Investing in the future conference, 31 October–2 November, Geelong. http://acen.edu.au/2012conference/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/65_Moving-beyond-the-diary.pdf

  • Harvey, M., Baker, M., Fredericks, V., Lloyd, K., McLachlan, K., Semple, A., & Walkerden, G. (2014, October). Reflection: Alignment of practice as a strategy for building capacity for learning. In K. Moore (Ed.), Conference proceedings, 2014 ACEN work integrated learning: Building capacity conference, 1–3 October, Tweed Heads, pp. 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009, June). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/developingundergraduate_final.pdf

  • Jones, S., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G., & Ryland, K. (2014). Synthesising theory and practice: Distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(5), 603–619. doi:10.1177/1741143213510506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Personal praxis. Learning through experience. In S. Kemmis, & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis. Challenges for education (pp. 15–35). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C., & Castleden, H. (2009). Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure: Reflective and critically reflective process in ‘pure/soft’ and ‘pure/hard’ fields. Higher Education, 57(4), 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie University. (2011). Criteria for PACE units and activities. http://staff.mq.edu.au/teaching/professional_and_community_engagement/participation_units/criteria_for_participation_units/. Accessed 29 May 2014.

  • Moch, S. D. (1990). Personal knowing: Evolving research and practice. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 4, 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzer, H., Snelling, J., & Blake, D. (1997). Promoting reflective practitioners in nursing: A review of theoretical models and research into the use of diaries and journals to facilitate reflection. Teaching in Higher Education, 2(2), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probert, B. (2014, May). Why scholarship matters in higher education. Discussion paper 2. Office for learning and teaching discussion paper series. http://www.olt.gov.au/resources/good-practice?text=probert

  • Richert, A. E. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, G. (2002). Reflective practice: Where now? Nurse Education in Practice, 2(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner (p. 5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, Y. (2010). Building in research and evaluation: Human inquiry for living systems. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerden, G. (2005). Felt knowing: A foundation for local government practice. In M. Keen, V. A. Brown, & R. Dyball (Eds.), Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future (pp. 170–187). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerden, G. (2009). Researching and developing practice traditions using reflective practice experiments. Quality and Quantity, 43(2), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerden, G. (2014, October). Developing platform skills for the workplace: Weaving reflective practice experiments into everyday life. In K. Moore (Ed.), Conference proceedings, 2014 ACEN work integrated learning: Building capacity conference, 1–3 October (pp. 90–94). Tweed Heads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (n.d.). Communities of practice. A brief introduction. Accessed from http://wenger-trayner.com/theory/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Harvey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harvey, M. et al. (2017). Reflection for Learning: A Holistic Approach to Disrupting the Text. In: Sachs, J., Clark, L. (eds) Learning Through Community Engagement. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0997-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0999-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics