Abstract
How does research develop in a certain area like science education? Who defines research areas? How does a country get on board by providing suitable environments and standards? How can researchers cooperate successfully to raise the quality and the variety of research approaches and research foci? These questions are raised and discussed in several chapters of this book. The explored developments in Asian countries could for sure raise similar questions also in other areas of the world, and might lead to a worldwide reflection of the state of research in our broad field of science education. They might also initiate some critical thinking about influences that might not always foster an enrichment of science education research, but perhaps, on the contrary, a narrowing mind by copying well-established approaches (only). How can research communities develop standards without taking the risk of developing monocultures predominantly?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Becker, H. J., Minh Quang, N., & Parchmann, I. (2015). Trendbericht Chemiedidaktik 2014 [Trends in Chemistry Education 2014]. Nachrichten aus der Chemie, 63, 364–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parchmann, I. (2016). Commentary: Who Sets Trends in Science Education? I Comment on Four Exemplary Book Chapters. In: Chiu, MH. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0845-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0847-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)