Skip to main content

Efficiency Improvement in China’s Energy-Intensive Industries and Their Contributions to Carbon Emission Reduction Targets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China's Energy Efficiency and Conservation

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((BRIEFSSECUR,volume 30))

  • 553 Accesses

Abstract

China is presently undergoing an intensive industrialisation. As the world’s largest emerging economy, energy efficiency is expected to play a critical role in China’s ever-rising demand for energy. Based on factual overviews and numerical analysis, this chapter presents an in-depth investigation into the effectiveness of policies announced or implemented in recent decades targeted at energy conservation in energy-intensive manufacturing sectors. It highlights nine energy-intensive sectors that achieved major improvements in their energy technology efficiency efforts. Under the umbrella of the 11th Five-Year Plan, the success of these sectors’ energy-saving efforts reflects the effectiveness of China’s energy conservation policies. The Chinese government has introduced various measures to reduce the road transport sector’s demand for energy and its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: by implementing fuel economy standards, and by promoting advanced energy-efficient vehicles and alternative fuels. Coal-based energy-saving technologies, especially industrial furnace technologies, are critical for China’s near and medium-term energy-saving goals, which include the improvement of the direct technical efficiency for power generation, iron and steel production, non-ferrous products production, and non-metal mineral products production. In the long run, renewable energy development and expanding the railway transport system are the most effective ways to reduce China’s energy use and GHG emissions. Its road vehicles are projected to consume 370–520 million metric tons of oil and produce 1.6–2.0 billion tons of GHGs by 2050. Fuel economy standards could reduce oil consumption and GHGs by 34–35 %.

Dr. Libo Wu, Professor, School of Economics, Fudan University, China; Email: wulibo@fudan.edu.cn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    O&M cost represents the operation and maintenance cost of an energy technology. For example, in a coal-fired power plant, the fixed O&M cost includes the salaries of employees and the repair fees of power equipment, while the variable O&M cost implies the cost of electricity and some fuel oil associated with the use of the power plant.

References

  • Alfstad, T. (2005) “Development of a Least Cost Energy Supply Model for the SADC Region”. Master thesis, University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. (2005) “The Costs of Mitigating Carbon Emissions in China: Findings from China MARKAL-MACRO Modeling”. Energy Policy 33, 7: 885–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. and Z. Wu (2001) “Use MARKAL Model to Study the Future Sustainable Energy Development Strategy in China”. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology) 41, 12: 103–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. and Z. Wu (2002) “China’s Future Policies to Control SO2 and CO2”. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology) 42, 10: 1320–3. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., P. Gao and J. He (2004) “Use MARKAL-MACRO Model to Study the Impact of Carbon Emission on Chinese Energy System”. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology) 44, 3: 342–6. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Z. Wu, J. He et al. (2007) “Carbon Emission Control Strategies for China: A Comparative Study with Partial and General Equilibrium Versions of the China MARKAL Model”. Energy 32, 1: 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., J. Liu, L. Ma et al. (2009) “Role for Carbon Capture and Storage in China”. Energy Procedia 1, 1: 4209–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagoumas, A.S. and T.S. Barker (2010) “Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy for the UK with the Macro-Econometric E3MG Model”. Energy Policy 38, 6: 3067–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaquil, P, W. Chen and E.D. Larson (2003) “Modeling China’s Energy Future”. Energy for Sustainable Development 7, 4: 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, D. and C. Chen (2001) “The CO2 Emission Reduction Benefits of Chinese Energy Policies and Environmental Policies: A Case Study for Shanghai, period 1995–2020”. Ecological Economics 39: 257–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainoun, A., M. Seif Aldin and S. Almoustafa (2010) “Formulating an Optimal Long-Term Energy Supply Strategy for Syria using MESSAGE Model”. Energy Policy 38: 1701–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, R. (2009) “Uncertainties in Key Low Carbon Power Generation Technologies: Implication for UK Decarbonisation Targets”. Applied Energy 86, 10: 1873–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makela, J. (2000) “Development of an Energy System Model of the Nordic Electricity Production System”. Master thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A., R. Mendelsohn and R. Richels (1995) “MERGE: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG Reduction Policies”. Energy Policy 23, 1: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, R.D. (2004) “Dynamics of Carbon Abatement in the Second Generation Model”. Energy Economics 26, 4: 721–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, H.-J., S. Lee, S. Maken, S.-W. Ahn et al. (2007) “Environmental and Economic Assessment of the Chemical Absorption Process in Korea using the LEAP Model”. Energy Policy 35, 10: 5109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., P. Delaquil, E.D. Larson et al. (2001) “Future Implications of China’s Energy-Technology Choices: Summary of a Report to the Working Group on Energy Strategies and Technologies”. Energy for Sustainable Development 5, 4: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.X. (2003) “Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China’s Industrial Sector in the 1990s? The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change”. Energy Economics 25, 6: 625–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Libo Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 Energy conservation policies in China over the past decade

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, L. (2016). Efficiency Improvement in China’s Energy-Intensive Industries and Their Contributions to Carbon Emission Reduction Targets. In: Su, B., Thomson, E. (eds) China's Energy Efficiency and Conservation. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace, vol 30. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0737-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics