Redressing the Imbalance

  • Elizabeth WarrenEmail author
  • Jodie Miller
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)


This chapter reviews the main findings of the study in relation to the research questions, and presents the implications for practice and research. While participating in the RPL, we theorize that teachers and students transitioned through five distinct stages of a professional learning and teaching trajectory. Each stage contributed to their journey towards becoming expert teachers and their students achieving academically, and each stage required different levels of support. Given the size and scope of the participants and the differing contexts in which they were situated, we also claim that this trajectory is generalizable to many other marginalized contexts at both the national and international level. Thus, the hypothesized professional learning and teaching trajectory frames our recommendations with regard to assisting young ESL students and Indigenous students living in disadvantaged contexts to effectively engage in Western mathematics.


Mathematical Knowledge Professional Learning Pedagogical Knowledge Mathematics Lesson Mathematical Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. (2014). First Nation Student Success Program. Retrieved from
  2. Actua. (2012). National Aboriginal Outreach Program. Retrieved from
  3. Aikenhead, G., & Michell, H. (2012). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Toronto: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Askew, M. (2008). Mathematical discipline knowledge requirements for prospective primary teachers, and the structure and teaching approaches of programs designed to develop that knowledge. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 13–36). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. doi: 10.3102/00028312026004473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Donald, D., Glanfield, F., & Sterenberg, G. (2011). Culturally relational education in and with an Indigenous community. In education, 17(3), 72–83.Google Scholar
  10. Galileo Educational Network. (2008). Mokakioyis Meyopimatisiwin. Retrieved from
  11. Hattie, J. A. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? In Background paper to invited address presented at the 2003 ACER Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from
  12. Hewitson, R. (2007). Climbing the educational mountain: a metaphor for real culture change for Indigenous students in remote schools. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 6–20.Google Scholar
  13. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jungic, V. & MacLean, M. (2011). The math catcher: mathematics through aboriginal storytelling. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from
  15. Lamb, S., & McKenzie, P. (2001). Patterns of success and failure in the transition from school to work in Australia, LSAY Report 18. Melbourne, VIC: ACER.Google Scholar
  16. Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia: The SiMERR national survey. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  18. Mann, C. (2006). 1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbus. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  20. Newmann, F. M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Mathematical literacy. Retrieved from
  22. Saskatoon Tribal Council. (2012). First Nations student success program. Retrieved from
  23. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. In R. F. Grose & R. C. Birney (Eds.), The transfer of learning: an enduring problem in psychology: selected readings (pp. 1–6). Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Warren, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Enriching the professional learning of early years teachers in disadvantaged contexts: The impact of quality resources and quality professional learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Warren, E., & Quine, J. (2013). Enhancing teacher professional development for early years mathematics teachers working in disadvantaged contexts. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning: advanced series in mathematics education (pp. 283–307). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Western Canadian Northern Protocol. (2013). “Our Way is a Valid Way”: Professional Educator Resource. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityVirginiaAustralia

Personalised recommendations