This chapter begins by looking broadly at learning as a process of knowledge construction and the increasing role of digital technologies in this process within tertiary education contexts. This is followed by an introduction to online learning along with definitions, discussion of foundational online learning concepts and contemporary pedagogical approaches used in online learning environments. Next, the reasons why motivation is an essential consideration in online teaching and learning contexts are explored. Then, existing research into motivation to learn in online environments is discussed in light of contemporary theoretical motivation frameworks. Finally, self-determination theory (SDT)—an intrinsic-extrinsic theory of motivation—is discussed in detail. In particular, the continuum of human motivation that outlines a range of different types of extrinsic motivation and the underlying psychological concepts of autonomy, competence and relatedness that SDT is built on are discussed. In doing so, justification for the use of SDT as the conceptual framework for this work is provided.
- Online learning
- Goal orientation
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Akbulut, Y. (2008). Predictors of foreign language reading comprehension in a hypermedia reading environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 37–50. doi:10.2190/EC.39.1.c.
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 3–31). Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120146.
Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1993.
Anderson, B., & Simpson, M. (2004). Group and class contexts for learning and support online: Learning and affective support in small group and class contexts. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(3), Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/index.
Anderson, B. (2006a). Writing power into online discussion. Computers and Composition, 23(1), 108–124. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.12.007.
Anderson, T. (2006b). Interaction in learning and teaching on the educational semantic web. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 141–155). London: Routledge.
Anderson, T. (2008). Teaching in an online context. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 343–366). Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120146.
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1826.
Artino, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students’ satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191–202.
Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260–270. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x.
Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2006). Learning online: Motivated to self-regulate? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(4), 176–182.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064.
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004.
Baynton, M. (1992). Dimensions of “control” in distance education: A factor analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 17–31. doi:10.1080/08923649209526783.
Bekele, T. A. (2010). Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 116–127.
Bell, P. D. (2007). Predictors of college student achievement in undergraduate asynchronous web-based courses. Education, 127(4), 523–533.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (2006). Affective and motivational outcomes of working in collaborative groups. Educational Psychology, 26(2), 187–208. doi:10.1080/01443410500344217.
Bonk, C. J., & Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100 + activities for motivating and retaining learners online. Bloomington, IN: Open World Books.
Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bullen, M., & Janes, D. P. (Eds.). (2007). Making the transition to e-learning: Strategies and issues. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Bures, E. M., Abrami, P. C., & Amundsen, C. C. (2000). Student motivation to learn via computer conferencing. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 593–621. doi:10.1023/A:1007071415363.
Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Chan, T. S., & Ahern, T. C. (1999). Targeting motivation—Adapting flow theory to instructional design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(2), 151–163.
ChanLin, L.-J. (2009). Applying motivational analysis in a web-based course. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 46(1), 91–103. doi:10.1080/14703290802646123.
Chen, C.-H., & Wu, I. C. (2012). The interplay between cognitive and motivational variables in a supportive online learning system for secondary physical education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 542–550. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.012.
Chen, K.-C., Jang, S.-J., & Branch, R. M. (2010). Autonomy, affiliation, and ability: Relative salience of factors that influence online learner motivation and learning outcomes. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal 2(1), 30–50.
Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota symposia on child development (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Conole, G. (2010). Personalisation through technology-enhanced learning In J. O’Donoghue (Ed.), Technology-supported environments for personalized learning: Methods and case studies (pp. 1–15). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Crippen, K. J., Biesinger, K. D., Muis, K. R., & Orgill, M. K. (2009). The role of goal orientation and self-efficacy in learning from Web-based worked examples. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(4), 385–403.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Emergent motivation and the evolution of the self. In D. A. Kleiber & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 4, pp. 93–119). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
Cutler, R. (1995). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 12–32.
Dalgarno, B. (2001). Interpretations of constructivism and consequences for computer assisted learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 183–194. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00189.
Dawson, S., Macfadyen, L., & Lockyer, L. (2009). Learning or performance: Predicting drivers of student motivation. Proceedings of the Ascilite Conference in Auckland, New Zealand (pp. 184–193). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/all-abstracts.html.
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
Deci, E. L., & Moller, A. C. (2005). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 579–597). New York: The Guilford Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Mcmillan.
Dron, J. (2007). Control and constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose. Hershey, PA: Information Science.
Dyke, M., Conole, G., Ravenscroft, A., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning theory and its application to e-learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice (pp. 82–97). London: Routledge.
Eastman, C., & Marzillier, J. S. (1984). Theoretical and methodological difficulties in Bandura’s self efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8(3), 213–229. doi:10.1007/bf01172994.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2/22.
Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 161–168). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.
Garrison, D. R., & Baynton, M. (1987). Beyond independence in distance education: The concept of control. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 3–15. doi:10.1080/08923648709526593.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005.
Ginsberg, M. B., & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2000). Creating highly motivated classrooms for all students: A schoolwide approach to powerful teaching with diverse learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233–240. doi:10.1037/a0012758.
Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2003). Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(2). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde10/articles/hara.htm.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645. doi:10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.528.
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42.
Hartnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted and situation-dependent. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 20–38. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1030.
Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning theory and practice. London: Sage.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. doi:10.1007/BF02319856.
Hickey, D. T., & Granade, J. B. (2004). The influence of sociocultural theory on our theories of engagement and motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 223–247). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher’s perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309–339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77–109). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 31–42. doi:10.1080/08923649409526853.
Hirumi, A. (2006). Analysing and designing e-learning interactions. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education (pp. 46–71). London: Routledge.
Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3–4), 7–25.
Hodges, C. B., & Kim, C. (2013). Improving college students’ attitudes toward mathematics. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve. Learning, 57(4), 59–66. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0679-4.
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Huang, H.-M., & Liaw, S.-S. (2007). Exploring learners’ self-efficacy, autonomy, and motivation toward e-learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(2), 581–586. doi:10.2466/PMS.105.6.581-586.
Huett, J. B., Kalinowski, K. E., Moller, L., & Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through the use of ARCS-based e-mails. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 159–176. doi:10.1080/08923640802224451.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It’s not autonomy support or structure, but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682.
Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2007). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice (pp. 190–202). London: Routledge.
Juwah, C. (2006). Interactions in online peer learning. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education (pp. 171–190). London: Routledge.
Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 429–442. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 11(4), 2–10. doi:10.1007/BF02905780.
Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, Summer (78), 39–47.
Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175–185. doi:10.1080/01587910802154970.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
Keller, J. M., & Deimann, M. (2012). Motivation, volition, and performance. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 84–95). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229–239.
Kickul, G., & Kickul, J. (2006). Closing the gap: Impact of student proactivity and learning goal orientation on e-learning outcomes. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 361.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-determination research (pp. 405–427). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 16–39.
Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 328–337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01306.x.
Lepper, M. R., Henderlong Corpus, J., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. doi:10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206.
Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction (Vol. 3: Conative and affective process analyses, pp. 255–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lin, Y.-M., Lin, G.-Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27. doi:10.2190/EC.38.1.a.
Lindgren, R., & McDaniel, R. (2012). Transforming online learning through narrative and student agency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 344–355.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531.
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/189/799.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
Martens, R. L., Gulikers, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 20(5), 368–376. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00096.x.
Martens, R. L., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Predicting intrinsic motivation. Association for educational communications and technology (pp. 621–630). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Matuga, J. M. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 4–11. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/.
McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (2004). Big theories revisited: The challenge. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 1–11). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10–27.
Mishra, S., & Juwah, C. (2006). Interactions in online discussions. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education (pp. 156–170). London: Routledge.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659.
Moore, M. G. (1990). Recent contributions to the theory of distance education. Open Learning, 5(3), 10–15. doi:10.1080/0268051900050303.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 23–38). London: Routledge.
Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 89–108). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 36(3), 203–231. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9028-3.
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 576–600. doi:10.3102/0034654308326083.
Moos, D. C., & Marroquin, E. (2010). Review: Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 265–276. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.004.
Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Friedman, R. (2012). Achievement goals and approach-avoidance motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 191–207). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ng, C. (2008). Multiple-goal learners and their differential patterns of learning. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 439–456. doi:10.1080/01443410701739470.
Ng, C. (2009). Profiling learners’ achievement goals when completing academic essays. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 279–295. doi:10.1080/01443410902797988.
Ng, C. (2012). The role of self-efficacy, control beliefs and achievement goals on learning among distance learners. In J. L. Moore & A. D. Benson (Eds.), International perspectives of distance learning in higher education (pp. 233–252). Shanghai: InTech.
Nichols, M. (2008). E-learning in context - #1. ePrimer series. Retrieved from Ako Aotearoa website http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/project/eprimer-series/resources/files/e-learning-context-1-eprimer-series.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25–34. doi:10.1007/BF02504795.
Paris, S. G., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Situated motivation. In P. R. Pintrich, D. R. Brown & C. E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 213–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
Paulus, T., & Scherff, L. (2008). “Can anyone offer any words of encouragement?” Online dialogue as a support mechanism for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 113–136.
Piaget, J. (1977). The origin of intelligence in the child. (M. Cook, Trans.). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Pierce, W., Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & So, S. (2003). Positive effects of rewards and performance standards on intrinsic motivation. The Psychological Record, 53(4), 561–579.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734–746. doi:10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.114.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. doi:10.1080/00461520903028990.
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 31–60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26(3), 183–207. doi:10.1023/A:1021711629417.
Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375–392. doi:10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1685.
Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 223–244). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Renninger, K. A., Cai, M., Lewis, M., Adams, M., & Ernst, K. (2011). Motivation and learning in an online, unmoderated, mathematics workshop for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9195-4.
Rentroia-Bonito, M. A., Jorge, J., & Ghaoui, C. (2006). Motivation to e-learn within organizational settings: An exploratory factor structure. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 4(3), 24–35.
Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers & Education, 59(3), 893–906. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.010.
Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1195–1206. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.012.
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285–297. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-9.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6.
Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001.
Rovai, A. P., & Lucking, R. (2003). Sense of community in a higher education television-based distance education program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 5–16. doi:10.1007/BF02504523.
Rovai, A. P., Ponton, M., Wighting, M. J., & Baker, J. (2007). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and e-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 413–432.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1585. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x.
Ryan, R. M., La Guardia, J. G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V., & Kim, Y. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relationships, 12(1), 145–163. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00106.x.
Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why and how. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 199–212. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9193-6.
Schallert, D. L., & Reed, J. H. (2003). Intellectual, motivational, textual, and cultural considerations in teaching and learning with computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 103–118.
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shea, P., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 19(4), 59–82.
Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. S. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 883–897. doi:10.1177/0146167207301014.
Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001.
Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D., Coombes, J., & Lee, F. (2007). Student e-learning intrinsic motivation: A qualitative analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2007(19), 241–260.
Shroff, R. H., & Vogel, D. R. (2009). Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 59–85.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2(1), 3–10. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.
Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 57–79. doi:10.1007/BF02300482.
Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2008). How does motivation develop and why does it change? Reframing motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 119–131. doi:10.1080/00461520802178441.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Koestner, R. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 257–262. doi:10.1037/a0012804.
Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, A. D. (2008). College seniors’ theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812–828. doi:10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1242.
Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22–35. doi:10.1080/08923649909527033.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, S.-L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007a). The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 600–612. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00645.x.
Wang, S.-L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007b). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2256–2268. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005.
Wang, S.-L., & Wu, P.-Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22. doi:10.1007/BF02504714.
Wighting, M. J., Liu, J., & Rovai, A. P. (2008). Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 285–295.
Xie, K., DeBacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67–89. doi:10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6.
Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71–83. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/.
Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75–98. doi:10.1080/10447310802546716.
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartnett, M. (2016). The Importance of Motivation in Online Learning. In: Motivation in Online Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0698-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0700-2