Advertisement

A Method of Three-Dimensional Thermo-Fluid Simulation of the Receiver of a Standard Parabolic Trough Collector

  • M. IslamEmail author
  • Suvash C. SahaEmail author
  • M. A. Karim
  • Prasad K. D. V. Yarlagadda
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

A parabolic trough collector (PTC) is the most proven concentrating collector system for indirect steam generation in solar thermal power plants. The receiver of the collector is fabricated enveloping a metal absorber tube using an evacuated glass tube. Depending on the level of evacuation, the glass envelope reduces the convection heat loss from the tube almost to zero. However, sometimes the envelopes are broken, damaged or removed that causes potential convection loss from an open-to-air receiver tube. On the other hand, the solar irradiance profile around the receiver tube is likely to be highly nonuniform. In order to study the heat transfer mechanism of an exposed receiver tube of a standard PTC under the actual optical and environmental conditions, a 3-dimensional Computational Conjugate Heat Transfer (CCHT) model of the receiver tube was developed. The CCHT model was developed applying finite volume technique of computational fluid dynamics integrating with a verified Monte Carlo ray tracing optical model. The CCHT model was verified extensively, and different heat loss models were developed to investigate the heat loss characteristics. The convection heat loss from the outer surface of the receiver tube was observed very high as it was exposed to a high-temperature gradient with its surroundings. Therefore, it is obvious that the receiver tube should be enveloped and evacuated properly. A well-managed and efficiently operated PTC solar energy field could be the best candidate for sustainable energy management for a sustainable future.

Keywords

LS2 collector Parabolic trough collector Computational fluid dynamics Conjugate heat transfer modelling Monte Carlo ray tracing Fluent 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is a part of a PhD project that is supported by a QUT post graduate research award and by a CSIRO Flagship collaboration fund PhD top-up scholarship through the Energy Transformed Flagship.

References

  1. 1.
    Grena, R. (2009). Optical simulation of a parabolic solar trough collector. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 29(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang, B., Zhao, J., Xu, T., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Calculation of the concentrated flux density distribution in parabolic trough solar concentrators by monte carlo ray-trace method. In: Photonics and Optoelectronic (SOPO) Symposium. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Molla, M. M., Saha, S. C., & Hossain, M. A. Radiation effect on free convection laminar flow along a vertical flat plate with streamwise sinusoidal surface temperature. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(5–6), 1310–1319.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vafai, K., Desai, C. P., Iyer, S. V., & Dyko, M. P. (1997). Buoyancy induced convection in a narrow open-ended annulus. Journal of Heat Transfer, 119(3), 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamad, F. A., & Khan, M. K. (1998). Natural convection heat transfer in horizontal and inclined annuli of different diameter ratios. Energy Conversion and Management, 39(8), 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyko, M. P., Vafai, K., & Mojtabi, A. K. (1999). A numerical and experimental investigation of stability of natural convective flows within a horizontal annulus. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 381, 27–61.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borjini, M. N., Mbow, C., & Daguenet, M. (1999). Numerical analysis of combined radiation and unsteady natural convection within a horizontal annular space. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow, 9(7), 742–764.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farinas, M. I., Garon, A., St-Louis, K., & Lacroix, M. (1999). Study of heat transfer in horizontal bare and finned annuli. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 42(21), 3905–3917.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dudley, V. E., Kolb, G. J., Mahoney, A. R., Mancini, T. R., Matthews, C. W., Sloan, M., & Kearney, D. (1994). Test results: Segs ls-2 solar collector, 139.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forristall, R. (2003). Heat transfer analysis and modeling of a parabolic trough solar receiver implemented in engineering equation solver. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401–3393, Technical report No. NERL/TP-550-34169.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kassem, T. (2007). Numerical study of the natural convection process in the parabolic-cylindrical solar collector. Desalination, 209(1–3), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reddy, K., Kumar, K. R., & Satyanarayana, G. (2008). Numerical investigation of energy-efficient receiver for solar parabolic trough concentrator. Heat Transfer Engineering, 29(11), 961–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reddy, K., & Satyanarayana, G. (2008). Numerical study of porous finned receiver for solar parabolic trough concentrator. Engineering applications of computational fluid mechanics, 2(2), 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reddy, K., & Kumar, N. S. (2009). An improved model for natural convection heat loss from modified cavity receiver of solar dish concentrator. Solar Energy, 83(10), 1884–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Odeh, S. D., Morrison, G. L., & Behnia, M. (1998). Modelling of parabolic trough direct steam generation solar collectors. Solar Energy, 62(6), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hou, Z., Zheng, D., Jin, H., & Sui, J. (2007). Performance analysis of non-isothermal solar reactors for methanol decomposition. Solar Energy, 81(3), 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    He, Y.-L., Xiao, J., Cheng, Z.-D., & Tao, Y.-B. (2011). A mcrt and fvm coupled simulation method for energy conversion process in parabolic trough solar collector. Renewable Energy, 36(3), 976–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheng, Z., He, Y., & Cui, F. (2013). A new modelling method and unified code with mcrt for concentrating solar collectors and its applications. Applied Energy, 101, 686–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Islam, M., Karim, A., Saha, S. C., Miller, S., & Yarlagadda, P. K. (2012). Three dimensional simulation of a parabolic trough concentrator thermal collector. In: The Proceedings of the 50th annual conference, Australian Solar Energy Society (AuSES), 6–7 December. Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Islam, M., Karim, A., Saha, S. C., Yarlagadda, P. K., Miller, S., & Ullah, I. (2012). Visualization of thermal characteristics around the absorber tube of a standard parabolic trough thermal collector by 3d simulation. In: the Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Methods (ICCM2012), November 25–27. Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Islam, M., Karim, A., Saha, S. C., Miller, S., & Yarlagadda, P. K. (2013). Development of optical ray tracing model of a standard parabolic trough collector. In: The Proceedings of the Renewable Energy for Sustainable Development & Decarbonisation, World Renewable Energy Congress—Australia 2013, 14–18 July. Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Islam, M., Karim, M. A., Saha, S. C., Miller, S., & Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. (2014). Development of empirical equations for irradiance profile of a standard parabolic trough collector using monte carlo ray tracing technique. Advanced Materials Research. Energy Development 860–863, 180–190.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ANSYS, I. (2011). Ansys fluent theory guide. SAS IP, Inc.: U.S.A.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Launder, B. E., & Spalding, D. B. (1974). The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3(2), 269–289.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng, Z. D., He, Y. L., Cui, F. Q., Xu, R. J., & Tao, Y. B. (2012). Numerical simulation of a parabolic trough solar collector with nonuniform solar flux conditions by coupling fvm and mcrt method. Solar Energy, 86(6), 1770–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheng, Z. D., He, Y. L., Xiao, J., Tao, Y. B., & Xu, R. J. (2010). Three-dimensional numerical study of heat transfer characteristics in the receiver tube of parabolic trough solar collector. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 37(7), 782–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharples, S., & Charlesworth, P. S. (1998). Full-scale measurements of wind-induced convective heat transfer from a roof-mounted flat plate solar collector. Solar Energy, 62(2), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leonard, B. P., & Mokhtari, S. (1990). Beyond first-order upwinding: The ultra-sharp alternative for non-oscillatory steady-state simulation of convection. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 30(4), 729–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saha, S. C., Patterson, J. C., Lei, C. Scaling of natural convection of an inclined flat plate: Sudden cooling condition. Journal of Heat Transfer, 133(4), 041503.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical EngineeringQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringChittagong University of Engineering and TechnologyChittagongBangladesh

Personalised recommendations