Abstract
Until the “CIETAC Split” in 2012, today’s SHIAC and SCIA were the sub-commissions of CIETAC respectively in Shanghai and Shenzhen. CIETAC had other two sub-commissions, located in Tianjin and Chongqing, which did not split and therefore are still its sub-commissions as of today.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See, for example, TAO Jingzhou, M. ZHONG, “Picking the Right Arbitration Institution in China”, in China Law & Practice, September/October 2014, 28–30; J. D’AGOSTINO, J. BOOTH, T. WU, “The Aftermath of the CIETAC Split: two years on, lower courts take clashing views on arbitration agreements and awards– but higher courts strive for consistency”, published May 2, 2014 in Kluwer Arbitration Blog: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2014/05/02/the-aftermath-of-the-cietac-split-two-years-on-lower-courts-take-clashing-views-on-arbitration-agreements-and-awards-but-higher-courts-strive-for-consistency/.
- 2.
Hong Kong Jia Development Co. v. Shenzhen Yong Co., [2012] Shen Zhong Fa She Wai Zhong Zi No. 226, Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court, November 20, 2012.
- 3.
Jiangxi LDK Solar Hi-tech v. Suzhou CSI Technology, [2013] Su Zhong Shang Zhong Shen Zi No. 0004, Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court, May 7, 2013.
- 4.
Risen Energy v. Jiangxi LDK Solar Hi-tech, [2013] Zhe Yong Zhi Cai Zi No. 1, Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court, May 22, 2013; Risen Energy v Jiangxi LDK Solar Hi-tech, [2013] Zhe Yong Jian Zi No. 1, Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court, July 25, 2013.
- 5.
Jiangxi LDK Solar Hi-tech v. Zhejiang Kingdom Solar Energy Technic, [2013] Zhe Tai Zhi Cai Zi No.2, Taizhou (Zhejiang) Intermediate People’s Court, July 29, 2013.
- 6.
Ni Laibao and Liu Donglian v. Soudal Investments Ltd., [2012] Hu Er Zhong Min Ren (Zhong Xie) Zi No. 5, Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People’s Court, December 31, 2014. The judgment was greeted with satisfaction by SHIAC: see http://www.cietac-sh.org/Announcement.aspx?nid=845.
- 7.
[2013] Shen Zhong Fa She Wai Zhong Zi No. 133, Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court, January 6, 2015.
- 8.
Supreme People’s Court, Reply to the Request for Instructions of Guangdong Province High People’s Court on the Case of Zhaoqing United Nations Metal Products Factory Co., Ltd. Requesting not to Enforce Award No. D19 (2013) of the South China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, [2014] Min Si Ta Zi No. 52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pisacane, G., Murphy, L., Zhang, C. (2016). A Recent Cause of Turmoil in the Landscape of Chinese Arbitration: The So-called “CIETAC Split”. In: Arbitration in China. China Law, Tax & Accounting. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0684-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0684-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0683-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0684-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)