Skip to main content

Against the Tide: Enacting Respectful Student Behaviour Polices in ‘Zero Tolerance’ Times

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenging Dominant Views on Student Behaviour at School

Abstract

School leaders are under pressure to ensure that their schools ‘manage’ students’ behaviour to establish ‘good order’. They are required to interpret, reconcile and make decisions about the plethora of legislation, policies and practices that relate to student behaviour in schools. This policy work is messy and complex, and influenced by ideological differences about the status children and the ways to ‘discipline’ them. The challenge for schools is to enact polices that do not aim simply to control students but rather aim to treat students with respect and enable them to develop as individuals with a sense of agency within a community of learners. This ‘policy work’ that schools do is the focus of the research reported in this chapter. We present findings from the Behaviour at School Study that show how schools can develop and enact respectful student behaviour policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, M., McDonald, T., Ormond, C., Rybarcyk, R., Taylor, A., & Winterton, A. (2009). Trajectories of classroom behaviour and academic progress: A study of student engagement with learning. Mount Lawley: Edith Cowan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1987). The micropolitics of the school. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2009). Disciplinary texts: a policy analysis of national and local discipline policies. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Hoskins, K., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011a). Disciplinary texts: A policy analysis of national and local behaviour policies. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011b). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: Some necessary but insufficient analyses. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 611–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J. J. (1986). A qualitative analysis of sources of teacher stress: Consequences for performance. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J. J. (1991). The micropolitical perspective. In J. J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools (pp. 1–18). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, L., & Canter, M. (2002). Assertive discipline – New and revised: Positive behavior management for today’s classroom. Santa Monica: Canter and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, E. (2013). Micropolitical staffroom stories: Beginning health and physical education teachersʼ experiences of the staffroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30(1), 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. The School Journal, 54(3), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 527–564). London: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, I. A. (1995). Student behavior patterns contributing to teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47, 335–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review for funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: what is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research annual conference on building teacher quality, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A review of the literature. London: Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. R. (1974). The politics of educational innovation. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2004). Local school micropolitical agency: An antidote to new managerialism. School Leadership and Management, 24(3), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2008). Implementing a child protection curriculum: Lessons from a South Australian trial. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 2(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Oswald, M., & Whitington, V. (1994). Teachers’ views on school discipline: A theoretical framework. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Peters, J., & Williams, D. (1999). Academics working with schools: Revealing the tensions. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(2), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, M. (2005). The power of discourse and the discourse of power: Pursuing peace through discourse intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, F. (1987). Prevention and intervention in the analytical perspective of guidance. In K. Hurrelmann, F. Kaufmann, & F. Losel (Eds.), Social intervention: Potential and constraints (pp. 3–20). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learning, S., & Taskforce, S. S. (2005). National safe schools framework. Canberra: MCEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R., Romi, S., Qui, X., & Katz, J. (2005). Teachers’ classroom discipline and student misbehaviour in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Ball, S., & Braun, A. (2010). Behaviour, classroom management and student ‘control’: Enacting policy in the English secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(2), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (2011). Of mottos and morals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overton, L. Y., & Sullivan, A. M. (2008). Non-compliance in a democratic classroom: Is it prevalent? Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in education international education research conference, Brisbane, QLD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P., & Mayr, A. (2013). Language and power: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (1995). Changing theories and practices of discipline. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1983). On the concept of perceived curriculum decision-making space. Curriculum Perspectives, 3(1), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. M. (2009). How can teachers enable students to become empowered? Curriculum Perspectives, 29(1), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. M., & Morrison, C. (2014). Enacting policy: The capacity of school leaders to support early career teachers through policy work. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(5), 603–620. doi:10.1007/s13384-014-0155-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Union, A. E. (2008). New educators survey 2008: Results and report. Melbourne: Australian Education Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinde, R., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Learning to get along at work. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Institute of Teaching. (2008). The effects of the physical environment on teaching and learning. Melbourne: Victorian Institute of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T. (2007). Classroom management around the world. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of research in international education (pp. 267–280). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is an outcome of the Behaviour at School Study funded by the Australian Research Council (LP110100317). We would like to acknowledge the other members of the research team: Professor Larry Owens, Professor Bob Conway , Mr Bill Lucas and Dr Mel Baak.

The following partner organisations contributed funds and/or in-kind support to this project:

Department for Education and Child Development South Australia

Catholic Education South Australia

Association of Independent Schools South Australia

South Australian Secondary Principals Association

Association of Principals of Catholic Secondary Schools, South Australia

South Australian Primary Principals Association

South Australian Catholic Primary Principals Association

Note: the views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the partner organisations’ policies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, B., Sullivan, A. (2016). Against the Tide: Enacting Respectful Student Behaviour Polices in ‘Zero Tolerance’ Times. In: Sullivan, A., Johnson, B., Lucas, B. (eds) Challenging Dominant Views on Student Behaviour at School. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0628-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0628-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0626-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0628-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics