Milkweed—A Potential Sustainable Natural Fibre Crop

  • T. KarthikEmail author
  • R. Murugan
Part of the Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes book series (EFEPP)


The demand for renewable raw materials is steadily rising as the drive for a green economy and a sustainable future accelerates. Mounting environmental issues and changing attitudes of consumers have made petroleum-based manufactured products more expensive and less desirable in the present world (as of 2016). Utilization of less valuable lignocellulosic fibres that are abundant and do not require irrigation for their cultivation makes them inexpensive and bio-degradable alternatives to petroleum-based synthetic fibres. These fibres are found in dry habitats in the USA, Asia and South Africa and contain over 2000 species worldwide, the properties of which slightly differ as a result of different soil conditions. In recent years, much research has been carried out into potential applications of milkweed fibre due to its incredible characteristics—such as hollowness, low density and hydrophobicity—particularly in technical textiles. The milkweed plant can adapt to almost any soil condition from swampy and moist to sandy and arid. It is a perennial plant and hence, once planted, does not require replanting each season and does not require any fertilizers, making the plant sustainable. Successful commercialization of milkweed as a crop is dependent upon mechanized harvesting, handling, drying and floss-processing systems. This chapter gives comprehensive information about the history of the milkweed plant and fibres, fibre morphology and characteristics, spinnability of milkweed fibres, fabric properties and potential application of milkweed fibres in such areas as clothing, lightweight composites, oil sorption as well as thermal and acoustic insulation.


Milkweed Hollow fibre Spinnability Insulation Oil sorption Composites 


  1. 1.
    Brundtland GH, Khalid M (1987) Our common future, report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karthik T (2014) Studies on the spinnability of milkweed fibre blends and its influence on ring, compact and rotor yarn characteristics. Ph.D. thesis, Anna UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashori A (2006) Non-wood fibers—a potential source of raw materials in paper making. Polym Plast Technol Eng 45:1133–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mauersberger HR (1962) Matthews’ textile fibers, 6th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Subramanian K, SenthilKumar P, Jeyapal P, Venkatesh N (2005) Characterization of ligno- cellulosic seed fiber from Wrightia Tinctoria plant for textile applications. Eur Polym J 41:853–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vijayraaghavan NN, Karthik T (2004) Multi component fiber technology for medical and other filtration applications. Synth Fiber 33(1):5–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell TA, Grasse KA (1986) Effect of stage of development on chemical yields in common Milkweed—Asclepias syriaca. Biomass 9:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karthik T, Gopalakrishnan D (2014) Environmental Analysis of Textile Value Chain: An Overview. In: Muthu SS (ed) Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing, Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer, Singapore, pp 153–188Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2002) Sustainable biocomposites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green material world. J Polym Environ 10:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos NE, Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP, Dufresne A (2001) J Mater Sci 36:2107–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karthik T, Rathinamoorthy R (2015) Recycling and reuse of textile effluent sludge. In: Muthu SS (ed) Environmental implications of recycling and recycled products. Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes. Springer, Singapore, pp 213–258Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rout J, Misra M, Mohanty AK, Nayak SK, Tripathy SS (2003) SEM observations of the fractured surfaces of coir composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 22(12):1083–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composite reinforced with cellulose based fibers. Prog Polym Sci 24:221–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    CIRCOT (1999) An insight into ligno-cellulosic fibres: structure and properties. CIRCOT, Mumbai, pp 89–94Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaitanya MVNL, Dhanabal SP, Rajendran RS (2013) Pharmacodynamic and ethnomedicinal uses of weed speices in nilgiris, Tamilnadu State, India: a review. Afr J Agric Res 8(27):3505–3527Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tuntawiroon N, Samootsakorn P, Theeraraj G (1984) The environmental implications of the use of calotropis gigantea as a textile fabric. Agric Ecosyst Environ 11:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witt MD, Knudsen HD (1993) Milkweed cultivation for floss production. In: Janick J, Simon JE (eds) New crops. Wiley, New York, pp 428–431Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muenscher WC (1975) Poisonous plants of the United States (Rev. ed.). Collier MacMillan, New York, pp 195–199Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berkman B (1949) Milkweed—a war strategic material and a potential industrial crop for submarginal lands in the United States. Econ Bot 3:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moore RJ (1946) Investigations on rubber bearing plants. IV. Cytogenetic studies in Asclepias Torr. L. Can J Res (Sect C) 24:66–73Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stevens OA (1945) Cultivation of milkweed. North Dakota Agric Exp Stat Bull 333–335Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaertner EE (1979) The history and use of milkweed (Asclepias Syriaca L.). Econ Bot 33(2):119–123Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lobstein MB (2013) There and back again: a short taxonomic history of milkweed. Accessed on 13 August 2015
  24. 24.
    Parrotta A (2001) John Healing plants of peninsular India. CABI Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lichtenstein MHC (1839) Zur Erledigung Dee Frage Uber Die Benutzung Der Syrischen seidenpflanze (asclepias syriacA). Ver. z. Beford, Gartenbaues, K. Preuss. Staaten Vernandl. 14(2):218–220Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ulbricht H (1940) Die bastfasern von asclepias syriaca L. Forscbung 14(4):232–237Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Knudsen HD, Sayler RY (1993) Milkweed: the worth of a weed. In: New crops, new uses, new markets 1992 year book of a agriculture, US Dept of Agriculture, Washington, pp 118–123Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nehring J (2013) The potential of Milkweed Floss as a natural fiber in the textile industry. J Undergrad Res 13:64–68Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ashori A, Bahreini Z (2009) Evaluation of Calotropis gigantean as a promising raw material for fiber-reinforced composite. J Compos Mater 43:1297–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Louis GL, Kottes BA (1987) Cotton/milkweed blends: a novel textile product. Text Res J 57(6):339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adams RP, Balandrin MF, Martineau JR (1984) The showy milkweed, Asclepias speciosa: a potential new semi-arid land crop for energy and chemicals. Biomass 4(2):81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borders B, Lee-Mäder E (2014) Milkweeds—a conservation practitioner’s guide. The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phippen WB (2007) Production variables affecting follicle and biomass development in common milkweed. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Issues in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, pp 82–87Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roşu A, Danaila-Guidea S, Dobrinoiu R, Toma F, Rosu DT, Sava N, Manolache C (2011) Asclepias syriaca L.—an underexploited industrial crop for energy and chemical feedstock. Rom Biotechnol Lett 16:131–138Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Beckett RE, Stitt RS (1935) The desert milkweed (Asclepias subulata) as a possible source of rubber. Technical Bulletin No. 472, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C, 23 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Knudsen HD, Zeller RD (1993) The milkweed business. In: Janick J, Simon JE (eds) New crops. Wiley, New York, pp 422–427Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crews PC, Rich W (1995) Influence of milkweed fiber length on textile product performance. Cloth Text Res J 13(4):213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heise PJ, Vidaver AK (1989) A new xanthomad: casual agent of bacterial blight of milkweed. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Plant pathology pp 547–552Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Witt MD, Nelson LA (1992) Milkweed as a new cultivated row crop. J Prod Agric 5(1):167171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilbur HM (1976) Life history evolution in seven milkweeds of the genus Asclepias. J Ecol 64(1):223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luna T, Kasten Dumroese R (2013) Monarchs (Danaus plexippus) and milkweeds (Asclepias species). Native Plants 14(1):5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stevens M (2003) Common Milkweed. USDA. Accessed on 23 July 2015
  43. 43.
    Crews PC, Sievert SA, Woeppel LT (1991) Evaluation of milkweed floss as an insulative fill material. Text Res J 61:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Woodson RE (1954) The North American species of Asclepias L. Ann Mo Bot Gard 41:1–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Anonymous (1944) Milkweed helps solve fiber problem. J Chem Educ 21(2):54–55Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Evetts LL, Burnside OC (1974) Root distribution and vegetative propagation of Asclepias syriaca L. Weed Res 14:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Drean J-YF, Patry JJ, Lombard GF, Weltrowski M (1993) Mechanical characterization and behavior in spinning processing of milkweed fibers. Text Res J 63(8):443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Karthik T, Murugan R (2013) Milkweed fibres: properties, and potential applications. Melliand Int 3:151–153Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Karthik T, Murugan R (2013) Characterization and analysis of ligno-cellulosic seed fiber from Pergularia Daemia Plant for textile applications. Fibers Polym 14(3):465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Varshney AC, Bhoi KL (1987) Some possible industrial properties of calotropis procesra (aak) floss fiber. Bio Waste 22(2):157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kottes Andrews BA, Kimmel LB, Bertoniere NR, Hebert JJ (1989) Comparison of the response of cotton and milkweed to selected swelling and crosslinking. Text Res J 59(11):675–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jones D, Von Bargen KL (1992) Some physical properties of milkweed pods. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 35(1):243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prasad P (2006) Physio-chemical properties of a nonconventional fiber: aak (calotropis procera). J Text Assoc 67(2):63–66Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Haghighat-Kish H, Shaikhzadeh-Najar S (1998) Structure and properties of a natural cellulosic hollow fiber. Int J Eng 11:101–108Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Knudsen HD (1990) Milkweed floss fiber for improving nonwoven products. In: TAPPI Proceedings of Nonwovens conference, USA, pp 209–212Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Reddy N, Yang Y (2009) Extraction and characterization of natural cellulose fibers from common milkweed stems. Polym Eng Sci 49:2212–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hessler LE, Merola GV, Berkley EE (1948) Degree of polymerization of cellulose in cotton fibres. Text Res J 18(10):628–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Timell TE, Snyder JL (1955) Molecular properties of milkweed cellulose. Text Res J 25(10):870–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Barth FW, Timell TE (1958) The constitution of a hemicellulose from milkweed (asclepias syriaca) floss. J Am Chem Soc 80(23):6320–6325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goda K, Sreekala MS, Gomes A, Junji TK, Ohji J (2006) Improvement of plant based natural fibres for toughening green composites—effect of load application during mercerization of ramie fibres. Compos Part A 37(12):2213–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gu P, Hessley RK, Pan W-P (1992) Thermal characterization analysis of milkweed floss. J Anal Appl Pyrol 24(2):147–161Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schwenker RF, Zuccarello RK (1964) Differential thermal analysis of synthetic fibres. J Polym Sci 6(1):1–16Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gharehaghaji AA, Hayat-Davoodi S (2008) Mechanical damage to Estabragh fibers in the production of thermobonded layers. J Appl Polym Sci 109:3062–3069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sakthivel JC, Mukhopadhyay S, Palanisamy NK (2005) Some studies on mudar fibers. J Ind Text 35(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Woeppel LT, Crews PC, Sievert SA (1990) Determining moisture characteristics of milkweed floss. AATCC Book of Papers 172–176Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Karthik T, Murugan R (2013) Influence of spinning parameters on milkweed/cotton DREF-3 yarn properties. J Text Inst 104:938–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Karthik T, Murugan R (2014) Influence of friction spinning process parameters on spinnability of Pergularia/Cotton-Blended Yarns. J Nat Fibers 11:54–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wazir TA, Shah SMA (1977) Physical characteristics and utilization of aak (Calotropis procera) fibers. Pak J Forest 27(2):69–80Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bahl M, Arora C, Parmar MS, Rao JV (2013) Surface modification of milkweed fibers to manufacture yarns. Text Potpouri Colourage 60:33–35Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bahreini Z, Kiumarsi A (2008) A comparative study on the dyeability of stabraq (milkweed) fibers with reactive dyes. Prog Color Color Coat 1(1):19–26Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bakhtiari M, Hasani H, Zarrebini M, Hassanzadeh S (2015) Investigation of the thermal comfort properties of knitted fabric produced from Estabragh (Milkweed)/cotton-blended yarns. J Text Inst 106:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Reddy N, Yang Y (2010) Non-traditional lightweight polypropylene composites reinforced with milkweed floss. Polym Int 59:884–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nourbakhsh A, Ashori A, Kouhpayehzadeh M (2008) Giant milkweed (Calotropis persica) fibers—a potential reinforcement agent for thermoplastics composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 28:2143–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Srinivas CA, Babu GD (2013) Mechanical and machining characteristics of Calotropis Gigentea Fruit fiber reinforced plastics. Int J Eng Res Tech 2:1524–1530Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Merati AA (2014) Reinforcing of cement composites by Estabragh fibers. J Inst Eng India Ser E 20:1–6Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Choi H-M, Cloud RM (1992) Natural sorbents in oil spill cleanup. Environ Sci Technol 26:772–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Choi H-m, Moreau JP (1993) Oil sorption behavior of various sorbents studied by sorption capacity measurement and environmental scanning electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 25:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rengasamy RS, Das D, Karan CP (2011) Study of oil sorption behavior of filled and structured fiber assemblies made from polypropylene, kapok and milkweed fibers. J Hazard Mater 186:526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hassanzadeh S, Hasani H, Zarrebini M (2014) Analysis and prediction of the noise reduction coefficient of lightly-needled Estabragh/polypropylene nonwovens using simplex lattice design. J Text Inst 105:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hasani H, Zarrebini M, Zare M, Hassanzadeh S (2014) Evaluating the acoustic properties of Estabragh (Milkweed)/Hollow-Polyester nonwovens for automotive applications. Text Sci Eng 4:1–6Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Fowler AJ, Warner SB, Toner M (2002) Development of bio-active fabrics. NTC Project. National Textile Center Research Briefs—Materials CompetencyGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Penn State (2015) Introduction to weeds and herbicides. Accessed on 13 Aug 2015
  83. 83.
    McDiarmid M (2014) Milkweed touted as oil-spill super-sucker—with butterfly benefits. Accessed on 28 July 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Textile TechnologyPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations