Skip to main content

Direct-Push Drilling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mechanical Ice Drilling Technology

Part of the book series: Springer Geophysics ((SPRINGERGEOPHYS))

  • 841 Accesses

Abstract

Direct-push drilling technology includes methods that advance a drill by pushing, hammering, or vibrating. Although these methods do not meet the proper definition of drilling, they do achieve the same result—a borehole and, if applicable, a core. Direct-push drilling tools do not remove cuttings from the hole. Rather, deepening occurs due to the compression of the formation. Properly speaking, direct-push drilling cannot be used in solid ice, but it can be considered for investigations of compressible snow-firn layers. Two direct-push methods for snow-firn drilling have recently been used: (1) drive sampling and (2) penetrative testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bader H, Haefeli R, Bucher E, et al (1939) Der Schnee und seine Metamorphose. Beitr. Geologie der Schweiz, Geotech. Ser. Hydrol., 3 [In German]

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont RT (1967) Field accuracy of volumetric snow samplers at Mt. Hood, Oregon. Proceedings of international conference on low temperature science—conference on physics of snow and ice, Sapporo, Japan, 14–19 Aug 1966. ILTS, vol 1, no 2, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, pp 1007–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont RT, Work RA (1963) Snow sampling results with different snow samplers. Proceedings of the 31st annual western snow conference, Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 17–19 April 1963, pp 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezovskaya S, Kane DL (2007) Strategies for measuring snow water equivalent for hydrological applications: part 1, accuracy of measurements. Proceedings of 16th northern research basin symposium, Petrozavodsk, Russia, 27 Aug–2 Sep 2007, pp 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley CC (1968) The resistograph and the compressive strength of snow. J Glaciol 7(51):499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RL, Birkeland KW (1990) A comparison of the digital resistograph with the ram penetrometer. Proceedings of the fifth international snow science workshop, Big Fork, Montana, USA, 9–13 Oct 1990, pp 19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Clyde GD (1932) Utah snow sampler and scales for measuring water content of snow. Circular 99. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Logan, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins A (2011) Forecasting western waters—carrying on a tradition. United States Department of Agriculture, NRCS Idaho. Posted on 2 Mar 2011. Available at: http://blogs.usda.gov/2011/03/02/forecasting-western-waters-%E2%80%93-carrying-on-a-tradition/. Accessed 4 July 2014

  • Derry J, Lilly M, Schultz G (2009) Snow data collection methods related to Tundra Travel, North Slope, Alaska: 2009. Arctic transportation network project, Rep. Number GWS.TR.09.05

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon D, Boon S (2011) Comparison of the SnowHydro snow sampler with existing snow tube designs in southwestern Alberta, Canada. Proceedings of the 68th eastern snow conference, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 14–16 June 2011, pp 207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd T, Brown RL (1986) A new instrument for determining strength profiles in snow cover. J Glaciol 32(111):299–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnes PE, Goodison BE, Peterson NR et al (1982) Metrication of manual snow sampling equipment by Western Snow Conference Metrication Committee. Proceedings of 50th annual meeting: western snow conference, Reno, Nevada, USA, 9–23 April 1982, pp 120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyer AJ (2008) Layer detection and snowpack stratigraphy characterisation from digital penetrometer signals. Ph.D. Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, p 253

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodison B, Glynn JE, Harvey KD et al (1987) Snow surveying in Canada: a perspective. Can Water Resour J 12:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene E, Atkins D, Birkeland K et al (2010) Snow, weather and avalanches: observation guidelines for avalanche programs in the United States. Chapter 2—Snowpack observations. American Avalanche Association, Pagosa Springs, CO, Second Printing Fall 2010, pp 21–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Guide to hydrological practices (2008) Volume I: hydrology—from measurement to hydrological information, 6th edn. World Meteorological Organization (WMO-No. 168)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuberger JC (1954) Glaciologie. Groenland, vol I: Forages Sur L’inlandsis. Jean-Charles. Expéditions Polaires Françaises. V. Paris, Hermann & Cie (In French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley JJ, Stanford K, Koci B et al (1994) Ice coring and drilling technologies developed by the Polar Ice Coring Office. Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on Ice Drilling Technology, Tokyo, 20–23 April 1993, vol 49, pp 24–40 (Mem Nat Inst Polar Res)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence WS, Bradley CC (1973) Comparison of the snow resistograph with the ram penetrometer. J Glaciol 12(65):315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie R, Payten W (2002) A portable, variable-speed penetrometer for snow pit evaluation. Proceedings of 11th international snow science workshop, Penticton, BC, Canada, 29 Sept–4 Oct 2002, pp 294–300

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum A (2014a) Cone penetration testing (CPT) in Antarctic firn: an introduction to interpretation. J Glaciol 60(219):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum A (2014b) A brief introduction to cone penetration testing (CPT) in frozen geomaterials. Ann Glaciol 55(68):7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClung D, Schaerer PA (2006) The avalanche handbook, 3rd edn. Mountaineers books

    Google Scholar 

  • Morev VA, Zagorodnov VS (1992) Drilling large diameter boreholes in snow and firn. PICO Tech. Note TN-92-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Perla RI (1969) Strength tests on newly fallen snow. J Glaciol 8:427–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Perla RI, Martinelli M (1976) Avalanche handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Alpine Snow and Avalanche Research Project

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampling Instruments (n.d.) Geo Scientific Ltd. Available at: http://www.geoscientific.com/sampling/. Accessed 3 Jul 2014

  • Schaap LHJ, Föhn PMB (1987) Cone penetration testing in snow. Can Geotech J 24:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneebeli M, Johnson JB (1998) A constant-speed penetrometer for high-resolution snow stratigraphy. Ann Glaciol 26:107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneebeli M, Pielmeier C, Johnson JB (1999) Measuring snow microstructure and hardness using a high resolution penetrometer. Cold Reg Sci Technol 30:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SnowMicroPen (n.d.) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF. Available at: http://www.slf.ch/ueber/organisation/schnee_permafrost/schneephysik/SnowMicroPen/index_EN. Accessed 20 July 2014

  • SWE Coring Tube (2013) SnowHydro. Available at: http://www.snowhydro.com/products/column3.html. Accessed 7 July 2014

  • Woo MK 1997 A guide for ground based measurement of the arctic snow cover. Canadian Snow Data CD, Meteorological Service of Canada, Downsview, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Work RA, Stockwell HJ, Freeman TG et al (1965) Accuracy of field snow surveys in Western United States, including Alaska. USA CRREL Tech Rep, 163

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel G. Talalay .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Geological Publishing House, Beijing and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talalay, P.G. (2016). Direct-Push Drilling. In: Mechanical Ice Drilling Technology. Springer Geophysics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0560-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics