Abstract
‘Sustainability’ is an emerging issue that product development engineers must engage with to remain relevant, competitive and, most importantly, responsible. Yet, on examining the term ‘sustainable’, a plethora of definitions emerges, many of which are contradictory and confusing. This confusion and a general lack of understanding means that sustainability often gets relegated to an afterthought or a buzz-word used on marketing material, no matter how ‘sustainable’ the product actually is. The role of the ‘sustainable’ product developer is to look for new opportunities to design products that minimize harmful effects on the environment and to seek to develop environmental, social, and economically beneficial product solutions. The advent of additive manufacturing technologies presents a number of opportunities that have the potential to benefit designers greatly and contribute to the sustainability of products. Products can be extensively customized for the user, thus potentially increasing their desirability, pleasure and attachment—and therefore longevity. Additive manufacturing technologies have also removed many of the manufacturing restrictions that may previously have compromised a designer’s ability to make the product they imagined which, once again, can increase product desirability, pleasure and attachment. As additive manufacturing technologies evolve, design methodologies for lightweighting, such as topology optimization, become more advanced, more new materials become available, and multiple material technologies are developed, the field of product design has the potential for great change. This chapter examines aspects of additive manufacturing from a sustainable design perspective and looks at the potential to create entirely new business models that could bring about the sustainable design of consumer products. It first gives a brief literature review both on sustainable product development and on additive manufacturing, and then examines several case study products that were made with additive manufacturing. It concludes that there is a likelihood that additive manufacturing allows more sustainable products to be developed, but also that more quantifiable research is needed in the area to allow designers to exploit better the features of additive manufacturing that can maximize sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abukhader SM (2008) Eco-efficiency in the era of electronic commerce—Should an eco-effectiveness approach be adopted? J Clean Prod 16:801–808
Accenture (2014) Circular advantage: innovative business models and technologies to create value in a world without limits to growth
Arstechnica.com, Costing on production video games, http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2006/12/8479.ars. Accessed Nov 2015
Braungart M, McDonough W, Bollinger A (2007) Cradle to cradle design: creating healthy emission—A strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J Clean Prod 15:1337–1348
Bulow J (1986) An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101:729–749
Campbell RI (2008) Creating a design for additive fabrication feature repository, RAPDASA 2008, Rapid Product Development Association of South Africa Conference, South Africa
Ciambrone DF (1997) Environmental life cycle analysis. CRC Press LLC, Florida
CORDIS: Community Research and Development Information Service (2009) Strengthening the industries competitive position by the development of a logistical and technological system for spare parts that is based on on-demand production (DIRECTSPARE)
Datschefski E (2004) The Total Beauty of Sustainable Products, London, BioThinking International, http://www.biothinking.com/btintro.htm. Accessed January 2016
Diegel O (2015) Figures and diagrams for this book chapter
Dreyer L, Niemann A, Hauschild M (2003) Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):191–200. doi:10.1007/BF02978471
Fadel G (2004) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing technologies: accomplishments and potentials. 5th international symposium on tools and methods of competitive engineering—TMCE’04, vol 1, Lausanne, 13–17 April 2004, pp 29–47
Fuad-Luke A (2009) The eco-design handbook: a complete sourcebook for the home and office, 3rd edn. Thames & Hudson, London
Gilmore JH, Pine BJ (2007) Authenticity: what consumers really want. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp 45–79
Glavic P, Lukman R (2007) Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J Clean Prod 15:1875–1885
Goedkoop M, Effting S, Collignon M (2000) The eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life-cycle impact assessment: manual for designers. PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort
Govers PCM, Mugge R (2004) ‘I love my Jeep, because it’s tough like me’: the effect of product-personality congruence on product attachment, 2004 international conference on design and emotion, Ankara, Turkey
Halweil B, Mastny L, Assadourian E (2004) State of the world 2004—Special focus: The Consumer Society. Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC
Hernandez G, Mistree F (2000) Integrating product design and manufacturing: a game theoretic approach. Eng Optim 32(6):749–775
Hofstra.edu, Graphs on show production costs in China, http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch5en/appl5en/costs_shoe_China.html. Accessed Nov 2015
Hopkinson N, Dickens PM (2003) Analysis of rapid manufacturing-using layer manufacturing processes for production. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 217:31–39
Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (2006) Rapid manufacturing an industrial revolution for the digital age. Wiley, New York
Hunt D (2006) PhD thesis: a consumer perspective on mass customization, University of Missouri-Columbia, May 2006. Available from http://edt.missouri.edu/Winter2006/Dissertation/HuntD-052506-D4001/research.pdf. Accessed Feb 2010
Kemp R, Martens P (2007) Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 3(2):5–14
Kianian B, Larsson TC (2015) Additive manufacturing technology potential: a cleaner manufacturing alternative. 20th design for manufacturing and the life cycle conference (DFMLC). Proceedings of the ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC/CIE 2015), 2–5 Aug 2015, Boston, MA, USA
Kobayashi H (2006) A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning. Adv Eng Inform 20:113–125
Le Pochat S, Bertoluci G, Froelich D (2007) Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs. J Clean Prod 15(7):671–680. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.004
Ljungberg LY (2007) Materials selection and design for sustainable products. Mater Des 28:466–479
Luo Y, Ji Z, Ming L, Caudill R (1999) Environmental performance analysis of solid freeform fabrication processes. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 11–13 May 1999
McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. North Point Press, New York
McDonough W, Braungart M, Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB (2003) Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. Environ Sci Technol 1:434–441
Missimer M (2015) Social sustainability within the framework for strategic sustainable development. Doctoral thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Strategic Sustainable Development. ISBN 978-91-7295-307-9
Mugge R, Schifferstein HNJ, Schoormans JPL (2004) Personalizing product appearance: the effect on product attachment. 2004 international conference on design and emotion, Ankara, Turkey
Packard V (1978) Waste makers. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0671822942
Page T (2014) Product attachment and replacement: implications for sustainable design. Int J Sustain Des 2(3):265–282. doi:10.1504/IJSDES.2014.065057
Papanek V (1985) Design for the real world: human ecology and social change, 2nd edn. Academy Chicago Publishers, Illinois
Park M (2005) Sustainable consumption in the consumer electronics sector: design solutions and strategies to minimise product obsolescence. 6th Asia Pacific roundtable for sustainable consumption and production (APRSCP); Melbourne, Australia, Oct 2005
Pine J, Gilmore J (2000) Markets of one: creating customer-unique value through mass customisation. Harvard Business Review Book, Boston
Reimer J (2006) Costing on production video games, http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2006/12/8479.ars. Accessed Oct 2015
Rodrigue JP (2015) Graphs on show production costs in China, http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch5en/appl5en/costs_shoe_China.html. Accessed Oct 2015
Ruffo M, Hague R (2007) Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing- simultaneous production of mixed components using laser sintering. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 221(11):1585–1591
Ruffo M, Tuck C, Hague R (2006) Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing-laser sintering production for low–medium volumes. Part B J Eng Manuf 220:1417–1428
Sherwin C (2004) Design and sustainability: a discussion paper based on personal experience and observations. J Sustain Prod Des 4:21–31
SME (2010) Available from http://www.sme.org/cgi-bin/communities.pl?/communities/techgroups/ddm/what_is_ddm.htm&&&SME. Accessed Feb 2010
Sosa R, Gero JS (2008) Social structures that promote change in a complex world: the complementary roles of strangers and acquaintances in innovation. Futures 40:577–585
Telenko C, Seepersad CC (2011) A comparative evaluation of energy consumption of selective laser sintering and injection molding of nylon parts. In: Proceedings of the 2011 solid freeform fabrication symposium, pp 41–54
Telenko C, Seepersad CC, Webber ME (2008) A compilation of design for environment principles and guidelines. 13th design for manufacturing and the lifecycle conference—DETC/DFMLC’08, vol 5, New York, NY, 3–6 Aug 2008, pp 289–301. doi: 10.1115/DETC2008-49651
Tischner U, Charter M (2001) Sustainable product design. In: Charter M, Tischner U (eds) Sustainable solutions: developing products and services for the future. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield, pp 118–138
Vallet F, Eynard B, Millet D, Glatard MS, Tyl B, Bertoluci G (2013) Using eco-design tools: an overview of experts’ practices. Des Stud 34(3):345–377. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.10.001
Van Nes N, Cramer J (2003) Design strategies for the lifetime optimisation of products. J Sustain Prod Des 3:101–107. Springer, Berlin 2006
Van Nes N, Cramer J (2005) Influencing product lifetime through product design. Bus Strategy Environ 14(5):286–299
Vincent J (2006) Emotional attachment and mobile phones. Knowl Technol Policy 19(1):39–44
Waage SA (2007) Re-considering product design: a practical “road-map” for integration of sustainability issues, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.15, No.7, pp. 638–649
Waldman M (1993) A New Perspective of Planned Obsolescence, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 273–283.
Wenzel H, Hauschild M, Alting L (1997) Environmental assessment of products, vol 1. Chapman and Hall, London
Whiteley N (1993) Design for society. Reaktion Books, London
Wohlers T (2015) Worldwide progress report on the rapid prototyping, tooling, and manufacturing state of the industry. Wohlers report 2009, Wohlers Associates, USA
Zafarmand SJ, Sugiyama K, Watanabe M (2003) Aesthetic and sustainability: the aesthetic attributes promoting product sustainability. J Sustain Prod Des 3:173–186
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diegel, O., Kristav, P., Motte, D., Kianian, B. (2016). Additive Manufacturing and its Effect on Sustainable Design. In: Muthu, S., Savalani, M. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0549-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0549-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0547-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0549-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)