Skip to main content

Modeling Optimal Water Allocation by Managing the Demands in Selangor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover ISFRAM 2015

Abstract

Water in Selangor is getting scarce, yet it is the key to its economic development. A fast-growing population and expanding industrialization in the state creates demands for new water sources and innovative management of water resources and services. The goal of this study was to calculate the impact on the supply—demand gap for the city and industry sectors in Selangor by the year 2050. To achieve this, two main simulations involving groundwater application using the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) model, this, integrate an economic optimization model and a hydrology water management model. First simulation involves business as usual scenarios while the second incorporates the water saving measures into the simulation via the demand side management (DSM) analysis. Both simulations were carried out in the Selangor and Langat catchment as both catchments represent the main catchments for the state of Selangor. Such detailed simulation and inclusion of previously unaccounted for factors can help to create awareness of potential future problems, inform water practices, and suggest management alternatives. Results show that with the groundwater as an alternative resource and proper water saving measures, water deficit within Selangor can be significantly reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Babel MS, Das Gupta A, Nayak DK (2005) A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour Manage 19:693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gleick HP, Cooley H, Cohen M, Morikawa M, Morrison J, Palaniappan M (2009) The World’s water 2008–2009: The Biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Pr, Washinton DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mohd Firdaus Hum NN, Abdul-Talib S (2015) Modelling water supply and demand for effective water management allocation in Selangor (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keshtkar AR, Salajegheh A, Sadodin A, Allan MG (2013) Application of Bayesian network for sustainability assessment in catchment modeling and management (case study: the Hablehrood river catchment). Ecol Model 268:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brouwer R, Hofkes M (2008) Integrated hydro-economic modelling: approaches, key issues and future research directions. Ecol Econ 66:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Babel MS, Maporn N, Shide VR (2014) Incorporationg future climatic and socioeconomic variable in water demand forecasting: a case study in Bangkok. Water Resour Manage 28:2049–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reca J, Roldan J, Alcaide M, Camacho E (2001) Optimization model for water allocation in deficit irrigation system: I. Description of the model. Water Manage 48(2):103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bielsa J, Duarte R (2001) An economic model for water allocation in North Eastern Spain. Water Res Dev 17(3):397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Volk M, Hirschfeld J, Dehnhardt A, Schmidt G, Bohn C, Liershch S, Gassman PW (2008) Intergrated ecological-economic modelling of water pollution abatement management options in the Upper Ems River Basin. Ecol Econ 66:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellin-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydroeconomic models: concept, design, application and future prospects. J Hydrol 375:627–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosegrant M, Cai X, Cline S (2002) World water food to 2025: dealing with scarcity. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC, p 338

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Fraiture C (2007) Integrated water and food analysis at the global and basin level. An application of WATERSIM. Water Resour Manage 21:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maneta MP, Torres MO, Wallender WW, Vosti S, Howitt R, Rodrigues L, Bassoi LH, Panday S (2009) A spatially distributed hydroeconomic model to assess the effects of drought on land use, farm profits and agricultural employment. Water Resour Res 45:W11412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahrends H, Mast M, Rogers C, Kunstmann H (2008) Coupled hydrological-economic modelling for optimised irrigated cultivation in a semi-arid catchment of West Africa. Environ Model Softw 23:1327–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins MW, Lund J, Howitt R, Draper A, Msangi S, Tanaka S, Ritzema R, Marques G (2004) Optimization of California’s water supply system: results and insights. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qureshi M, Qureshi S, Bajracharya K, Kirby M (2008) Integrated biophysical and economic modelling framework to assess impacts of alternative groundwater management options. Water Resour Manage 22:321–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber AL (2005) WEAP21: a demand, priority and preferences driven water planning model: part 1 model characteristics. Water Int 30:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber AL, Galbraith H (2005) WEAP21: a demand, priority and preferences driven water planning model: part 2, aiding freshwater ecosystem service evaluation. Water Int 30:501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bharati L, Smakhtin VU, Anand BK (2009) Modelling water supply and demand scenarios: the Godavari—Krishna inter basin transfer, India. Water Policy 11(Supplement 1):140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blanco-Gutiérrez I, Vartega-Ortega C, Flichman G (2011) Cost-effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures: a multi-level analysis with policy implications. Agric Water Manag 98:639–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express deepest gratitude to the International Foundation of Science (IFS) grant, Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI) and Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurul Nadiah Mohd Firdaus Hum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hum, N.N.M.F., Abdul-Talib, S. (2016). Modeling Optimal Water Allocation by Managing the Demands in Selangor. In: Tahir, W., Abu Bakar, P., Wahid, M., Mohd Nasir, S., Lee, W. (eds) ISFRAM 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0500-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics