Advertisement

A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Calculating the Weights of Disassembly Line Balancing Criteria

  • Shwetank AvikalEmail author
  • Sanjay Sharma
  • J. S. Kalra
  • Deepak Varma
  • Rohit Pandey
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 436)

Abstract

Disassembly of outdated and previously consumed product takes place in field of remanufacturing, recycling, reusing and disposal. The disassembly lines have become the first choice for disassembly of the product that has been consumed previously. Disassembly line should be designed and balanced properly so that it can work as efficiently as possible. There are many different criteria in the disassembly lines for selecting the parts those are to be removed. The problem of disassembly line balancing is based on these different criteria. In this paper, the weights of these criteria have been evaluated. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP)-based approach has been applied to calculate the weight of each criterion. With the help of the weight of these criteria, the tasks can be assigned to workstations with different precedence constraint and cycle time limit.

Keywords

Product disassembly Line balancing Fuzzy theory AHP 

References

  1. 1.
    McGovern, S.M., Gupta, S.M.: 2-Opt heuristic for the disassembly line balancing problem. In: Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing III, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 71–84, 1994 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, S.M., Taleb, K.N.: Scheduling disassembly. Int. J. Prod. Res. 32(8), 1857–1866 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gungor, Gupta, S.M.: Disassembly line in product recovery. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40(11), 2569–2589 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gungor, Gupta, S.M.: Disassembly line balancing. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Northeast Decision Sciences Institute, Newport, Rhode Island, March 24–26, pp. 193–195 (1999b)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gungor, Gupta, S.M.: Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Comput. Ind. Eng. 36(4), 811–853 (1999a)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tiwari, M.K., Sinha, N., Kumar, S., Rai, R., Mukhopadhyay, S.K.: A petri net based approach to determine strategy of a product. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40(5), 1113–1129 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGovern, S.M., Gupta S.M.: Combinatorial optimization methods for disassembly line balancing. In: Proceedings of the 2004 SPIE International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 53–66 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGovern, S.M., Gupta, S.M.: Combinatorial optimization analysis of the unary NP- complete disassembly line balancing problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(18–19), 4485–4511 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altekin F.T., Kandiller, L., Ozdemirel, N.E., Profit-oriented disassembly-line balancing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46, 2675–2693 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koc, A., Sabuncuoglu, I., Erel, E.: Two exact formulations for disassembly line balancing problems with task precedence diagram construction using an AND/OR graph. IIE Trans. Oper. Eng. 41, 866–881 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding, L.P., Feng, Y.X., Tan, J.R., Gao, Y.C.: A new multi-objective ant colony algorithm for solving the disassembly line balancing problems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48, 761–771 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yeh, W.-C.: Simplified swarm optimization in disassembly sequencing problems with learning effects. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(9), 2168–2177 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karadag, A.A., Turkbey, O.: Multi-objective optimization of stochastic disassembly line balancing with station paralleling. Comput. Ind. Eng. 65(3), 413–425, (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalayci, C.B., Gupta, S.M.: Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving sequence-dependent disassembly line balancing problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(18), 7231–7241, (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, (1980)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, A.R., Mishra, P.K., Jain, R., Khurana, M.K.: Robust strategies for mitigating operational and disruption risks: a fuzzy AHP approach. Int. J. Multicriteria Decis. Mak. 2(1), 1–28 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shwetank Avikal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sanjay Sharma
    • 1
  • J. S. Kalra
    • 1
  • Deepak Varma
    • 2
  • Rohit Pandey
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentGraphic Era Hill UniversityDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Centre of Transportation EngineeringIIT RoorkeeRooekeeIndia

Personalised recommendations