Abstract
This chapter considers how to foster new approaches to learning and ensure quality in Japanese universities by analysing a case of quality assurance in a pre-service teacher education program in a Japanese university. Taking as an example university students’ learning in a teacher education program combined with an experimental educational project, this chapter proposes a new model of pre-service teacher education in the face of globalised processes and knowledge economies. Drawing on the framework of the cultural-historical activity theory, new forms of teacher education are exposed as facilitating university students’ expansive learning to collaboratively construct new concepts and implement them in practice. By developing coursework connected with practical experimentation to bridge the gap between theory and practice, the new model ensures the quality of teachers as researchers who investigate how people learn and develop, and research the meaning of life alongside children.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Central Council for Education in Japan. (2008). Gakushi katei kyouiku no kouchiku ni mukete [Toward building bachelor courses]. Tokyo: Central Council for Education in Japan.
Central Council for Education in Japan. (2012a). Kyoushoku seikatsu no zentai o tsuujita kyouin no shishitsu nouryoku no sougouteki na koujou housaku ni tsuite [On general strategies for the improvement of teachers’ abilities throughout their professional lives. Tokyo: Central Council for Education in Japan.
Central Council for Education in Japan. (2012b). Yosoku konnan na jidai ni oite shougai manabi tsuzuke shutaiteki ni kangaeru chikara o ikusei suru daigaku e [Toward universities that offer lifelong learning in an age of uncertainty and nurture capabilities for subjective thought]. Tokyo: Central Council for Education in Japan.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cox Suárez, S. (2006). Making learning visible through documentation: Creating a culture of inquiry among pre-service teachers. The New Educator, 2(1), 33–55.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Quality assurance in teacher education: An American perspective. In J. Harford, B. Hudson, & H. Niemi (Eds.), Quality assurance and teacher education: International challenges and expectations (pp. 131–158). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545.
Denton, J. J. (1982). Early field experience influence on performance in subsequent coursework. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 19–23.
Dewey, J. (1929). Sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright.
Elmore, R. F. (2002). The limits of “change”. Harvard Education Letter, 18(1), 7–8.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1991). Developmental work research: Reconstructing expertise through expansive learning. In M. I. Nurminen & G. R. S. Weir (Eds.), Human jobs and computer interfaces (pp. 265–290). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back and into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik/Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 16, 131–143.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation (pp. 1–43). Suita, Japan: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.
Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2013). Foreword: Formative interventions for expansive learning. In J. Virkkunen & D. S. Newnham (Eds.), The change laboratory: A tool for a collaborative development of work and education (pp. xv–xviii). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.
Engeström, Y., Pasanen, A., Toiviainen, H., & Haavisto, V. (2005). Expansive learning as concept formation at work. In K. Yamazumi, Y. Engeström, & H. Daniels (Eds.), New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work (pp. 47–77). Suita, Japan: Kansai University Press.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformation learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for in education. Buckingham, UK/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, H., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Illeris, K. (Ed.). (2009). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists—in their own words. London: Routledge.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2004). Teacher leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mehan, H. (2007). Inter-organizational collaboration: A strategy to improve diversity and college access for underrepresented minority students. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 63–91.
Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
Rinaldi, C. (2003). The teacher as researcher. Innovations in Early Education: The International Reggio Exchange, 10(2), 1–4.
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sannino, A., & Ellis, V. (Eds.). (2013). Learning and collective creativity: Activity-theoretical and sociocultural studies. London: Routledge.
Science Council of Japan. (2010). Daigaku kyouiku no bunya betsu shitsu hoshou no arikata ni tsuite [On field-specific quality assurance of university education]. Tokyo: Science Council of Japan.
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2005). Studying learning, transfer and context: A comparison of current approach to learning. In Y. Engeström, J. Lompscher, & G. Rückriem (Eds.), Putting activity theory to work: Contributions from developmental work research (pp. 21–47). Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2007). Studying developmental transfer as a goal of collaboration between school and work: A case study in the training of daycare interns. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 19–39.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
Yamazumi, K. (2006). Activity theory and the transformation of pedagogic practice. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook of Japanese Educational Research Association, 1, 77–90.
Yamazumi, K. (2008). A hybrid activity system as educational innovation. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 365–373.
Yamazumi, K. (2009). Expansive agency in multi-activity collaboration. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 212–227). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yamazumi, K. (2010a). Schools that contribute to community revitalization. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Activity theory and fostering learning: Developmental interventions in education and work (pp. 133–160). Suita, Japan: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.
Yamazumi, K. (2010b). Toward an expansion of science education through real-life activities in Japan. In Y.-J. Lee (Ed.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Asia (pp. 187–202). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Yamazumi, K. (2013). Beyond traditional school learning: Fostering agency and collective creativity in hybrid educational activities. In A. Sannino & V. Ellis (Eds.), Learning and collective creativity: Activity-theoretical and sociocultural studies (pp. 61–76). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamazumi, K. (2016). Quality Assurance in Teacher Education: Implications for Promoting Student Learning. In: Ng, Ch., Fox, R., Nakano, M. (eds) Reforming Learning and Teaching in Asia-Pacific Universities. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 33. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0431-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0431-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0429-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0431-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)