Skip to main content

Digital Soil Resource Inventories: Status and Prospects in 2015

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Soil Mapping Across Paradigms, Scales and Boundaries

Part of the book series: Springer Environmental Science and Engineering ((SPRINGERENVIRON))

Abstract

Eleven years ago, the author published a paper (Soil Use and Management 20(3): 296–301) titled “Digital soil resource inventories: status and prospects,” which concluded that, at the time, the quantity and quality of digital soil survey information at global, national, regional, and local scales was increasing dramatically, however, with several problems such as (1) lack of metadata, (2) limited interpretations for professionals who are not soil specialists, (3) geodesic incompatibility with other digital data, (4) frequent reorganization of Web sites, and most seriously (5) much digital data were proprietary and only available for sale or under license. The current paper updates the situation to mid-2015, with an inventory of publically available soil geographic databases, their coverage, the type of information, and intended purposes. These are summarized in a portal maintained by the author (http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/dgr2/research/sgdb/sgdb.html). With regard to the deficiencies identified eleven years ago, metadata provision is much improved; more products come with interpretations; geodetic incompatibility has largely been overcome by metadata and conversion programs; Web sites still change frequently and are often confusing; and much data are still proprietary or not generally accessible. Over the next several years, several disruptive technologies are predicted to radically change how online soil survey information is collected, compiled, and disseminated. The question of open access to primary data is not resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.onegeology.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.worldclim.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/.

  4. 4.

    http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/en/.

  5. 5.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu.

  6. 6.

    http://www.isric.org/.

  7. 7.

    http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/luc07/External-World-soil-database/HTML/index.html.

  8. 8.

    http://www.isric.org/content/soilgrids.

  9. 9.

    http://soilgrids.org/.

  10. 10.

    http://rest.soilgrids.org/.

  11. 11.

    http://soilinfo.isric.org/.

  12. 12.

    http://globalsoilmap.net.

  13. 13.

    http://www.fao.org/globalsoilpartnership/en/.

  14. 14.

    http://www.isric.org/projects/soil-and-terrain-database-soter-programme.

  15. 15.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/library/Maps/Africa_Atlas/.

  16. 16.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/library/maps/africa_atlas/data.html.

  17. 17.

    http://www.isric.org/data/AfSoilGrids250m.

  18. 18.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.

  19. 19.

    http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/.

  20. 20.

    http://www.asris.csiro.au/.

  21. 21.

    http://smap.landcareresearch.co.nz/home.

  22. 22.

    http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

  23. 23.

    http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/soilweb-apps/.

  24. 24.

    http://maps.bodemdata.nl.

  25. 25.

    http://gissol.fr/programme/bdgsf/bdgsf.php.

  26. 26.

    http://www.clw.csiro.au/aclep/soilandlandscapegrid/.

  27. 27.

    http://ncsslabdatamart.sc.egov.usda.gov/.

  28. 28.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/spade/.

  29. 29.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/Lucas/.

  30. 30.

    http://www.isric.org/data/isric-wise-international-soil-profile-dataset.

  31. 31.

    http://www.isric.org/content/africa-soil-profiles-database.

  32. 32.

    http://worldsoilprofiles.org.

  33. 33.

    http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esdb_archive/EuDASM/EUDASM.htm.

  34. 34.

    http://www.isric.org/content/search-library-and-map-collection.

  35. 35.

    https://www.wossac.com/.

  36. 36.

    http://ismn.geo.tuwien.ac.at/.

  37. 37.

    http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/scan/.

  38. 38.

    http://soilmoisture.tamu.edu/.

  39. 39.

    http://www.gdal.org/.

  40. 40.

    http://www.r-project.org/.

  41. 41.

    http://www.epsg-registry.org/.

  42. 42.

    http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu/.

  43. 43.

    http://www.fao.org/globalsoilpartnership/the-5-pillars-of-action/4-information-and-data/en/.

References

  • Arrouays D, Grundy MG, Hartemink AE, et al (2014) GlobalSoilMap. Advances in Agronomy. Elsevier, pp 93–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NH, Al-Adamat R, Bhattacharyya T, et al (2007) Preparation of consistent soil data sets for modelling purposes: Secondary SOTER data for four case study areas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 122:26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JL, Rustad LE, Porter JH, et al (2013) Quantity is nothing without quality: automated QA/QC for streaming environmental sensor data. BioScience 63:574–585. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.10

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, NW, Hempel, JW, Odgers, N, McBratney, AB, & Wood, EF (2015). dSSURGO: Development and validation of a 30 meter digital soil class product over the 8-million square kilometer contiguous United States. Geophysical Research Abstracts 17:EGU2015–11042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewitte O, Jones A, Spaargaren O, et al (2013) Harmonisation of the soil map of Africa at the continental scale. Geoderma 211-212:138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, de Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, et al (2014) SoilGrids1 km — Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping. PLoS ONE 9:e105992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105992

    Google Scholar 

  • IIASA; FAO; ISRIC; ISS-CAS; JRC (2012) Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2). FAO and IIASA, Rome, Italy and Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman LR, van Engelen VWP (1993) A world soils and terrain digital database (SOTER) — An improved assessment of land resources. Geoderma 60:309–325. doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(93)90033-H

    Google Scholar 

  • Omuto C, Nachtergaele F, Vargas Rojas, Ronald (2012) State of the art report on global and regional soil information: where are we? Where to go? ix, 69. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagos P, Jones A, Bosco C, Kumar PSS (2011) European digital archive on soil maps (EuDASM): preserving important soil data for public free access. International Journal of Digital Earth 4:434–443. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2011.596580

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagos P, Van Liedekerke M, Jones A, Montanarella L (2012) European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy 29:329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourabdollah A, Leibovici DG, Simms DM, et al (2012) Towards a standard for soil and terrain data exchange: SoTerML. Computers and Geosciences 45:270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.11.026

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter DG (2004) Digital soil resource inventories: status and prospects. Soil Use and Management 20:296–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Committee (2013) Specifications: Tiered GlobalSoilMap.net products; Release2.3. GlobalSoilMap.net

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon BS, Bhumbla DK, Sencindiver J, McDonald LM (2014) Using soil survey data for series-level environmental phosphorus risk assessment. Environmental Earth Sciences 72:2345–2356. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3144-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth B, Mako A, Guadagnini A, Toth G (2012) Water retention of salt-affected soils: Quantitative estimation using soil survey information. Arid Land Research and Management 26:103–121. doi: 10.1080/15324982.2012.657025

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, et al (2013) Multi-factorial drivers of ammonia oxidizer communities: evidence from a national soil survey. Environmental Microbiology 15:2545–2556. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12141

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Duffy C, Baldwin DC, Lin H (2014) The role of macropores and multi-resolution soil survey datasets for distributed surface-subsurface flow modeling. Journal of Hydrology 516:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.055

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Rossiter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossiter, D.G. (2016). Digital Soil Resource Inventories: Status and Prospects in 2015. In: Zhang, GL., Brus, D., Liu, F., Song, XD., Lagacherie, P. (eds) Digital Soil Mapping Across Paradigms, Scales and Boundaries. Springer Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0415-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics