Under the influence of Confucianism, the Chinese society puts more emphasis on effort than on innate ability to account for academic success or failure. As time for learning is a strong indicator of effort, it is expected that Chinese students would spend longer time on learning than their peers in other educational systems. The time use pattern may be an important way to distinguish the Chinese education from educational traditions in other cultures. In this study, we analyze the time use patterns of 15-year-old students in 18 high-performing education systems in PISA 2012. The data show commonalities among four Chinese societies—Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macao, and Shanghai—that students in all four Chinese societies spend long hours on deliberate learning in school, with a focus on reading, mathematics, and science. This pattern distinguishes them from many OECD countries. Additionally, our analysis also reveals intracultural variation. Outside the regular school hours, students from Shanghai and Taiwan dedicate a considerable amount of time to out-of-school-time lessons. In particular, Shanghai students spend much more time on unguided homework, whereas in Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, more importance is given to guided homework and tutoring. In sum, our findings suggest that the Chinese tradition of effort-emphasizing learning approach continues in the modern time, sustained both in and out of school. The extra learning outside school, however, exhibits a new trend indicating the decline of parental guidance.
- Chinese Society
- Chinese Student
- Learning Time
- Supplementary Tutoring
- Deliberate Learning
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Biggs, J. (1998). Learning from the Confucian heritage: So size doesn’t matter? International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 723–738.
Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implication for planners. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014). Measurement issues in research on shadow education: Challenges and pitfalls encountered in TIMSS and PISA. Comparative Education Review, 58(4), 590–620. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/677907
Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia (No. 9). Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model for school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll Model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26–31.
Chou, C. P., & Ching, G. (2012). Taiwan education at the crossroad: When globalization meets localization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clark, D., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Designing for knowledge integration: The impact of instructional time. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 451–493.
Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). The relationship between homework time and achievement is not universal: evidence from multilevel analyses in 40 countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(4), 375–405. doi:10.1080/09243450902904601.
Hsin, A., & Xie, Y. (2014). Explaining Asian Americans’ academic advantage over whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8416–8421. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406402111.
Liu, J. (2012). Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 46–52.
OECD. (2011). Quality time for students: Learning in and out of school. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Rev. ed., Vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201118-en.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499.
Smith, B. (2000). Quantity matters: Annual instructional time in an urban school system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 652–682.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our school are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Singapore: Springer.
Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework–achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 372–388. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009.
Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement—Still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115–145. doi:10.1023/A:1023460414243.
Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students’ self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 432–444.
Tucker, M. S. (Ed.). (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.
Xue, H., & Ding, Y. Q. (2009). A positivistic study on the private tutoring of students in urban China. Journal of Youth Studies [Hong Kong], 12(1), 115–128. (in Chinese).
Zhou, Y., & Wang, D. (2015). The family socioeconomic effect on extra lessons in Greater China: A comparison between Shanghai, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 363–377. doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0187-0.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhou, Y., Wang, D. (2016). A Chinese Approach to Learning? A Comparative Study on Time Use Patterns of 15-Year-Old Students in PISA 2012. In: Chou, C., Spangler, J. (eds) Chinese Education Models in a Global Age. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 31. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0330-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0328-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0330-1