Abstract
The extent to which a distinct Chinese education model can be identified is the subject of much debate. Among the many studies that approach the question, there is a tendency to be selective in elaborating the constituent elements of what could be viewed as a Chinese education model. Moreover, conceptualizations of Chinese education risk implying homogeneity in what can be more accurately understood as the overlapping of heterogeneous notions and practices in different educational contexts. By synthesizing evidence presented in this book and the research that has preceded it, this chapter aims to delineate the main aspects of what has been referred to as a Chinese education model. The chapter first argues that the Chinese education model is characterized by three attributes: dynamism, hybridity, and heterogeneity. It then makes the case that the Chinese education model can be more clearly understood by conceptually disaggregating it into its three key elements: norms, institutions, and individuals.
Keywords
- Educational Institution
- Qing Dynasty
- Education Model
- Filial Piety
- Chinese Context
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options


References
Beckett, G., & Zhao, J. (2016). Deweyan student-centered pedagogy and confucian epistemology: Dilemmatic pragmatism and neo-patriotism? In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Biggs, J. B., & Watkins, D. A. (2001). Insights into teaching the Chinese learner. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 277–300). Hong Kong: Centre for Comparative Research in Education.
Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? (pp. 1–132). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; International Institute for Educational Planning.
Cheng, K. S. Y., & Jacob, W. J. (2016). A study of educational policies relating to afterschool programs and educational equality in Taiwan. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Chiu, M. M. (2016). Chinese teaching and learning of mathematics. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Chou, C. P. (2014). The SSCI syndrome in higher education: A local or global phenomenon. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Chou, C. P. (2016a). Chinese models of university quality assurance: Case studies from China and Taiwan. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Chou, C. P. (2016b). A Chinese model of citizenship education in Taiwan: Under the influence of globalization, localization and cross-straitization. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Confucius. (2006). The essential analects: Selected passages with traditional commentary (trans: Slingerland, E.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Da, W.-W., & Welch, A. (2016). Educative and child-rearing practices among recent Chinese migrants in Australia: Continuity, change, hybridity. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Deng, W. (2016). Chinese higher education model in change: Negotiation with western power. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Guo-Brennan, L. (2016). Expanding horizons of curriculum wisdoms: Teachers’ experiences in new curriculum reform in China. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Ho, A.-H., & Wang, Y. (2016). Chinese model of education in New Zealand. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Hsu, Y.-N. (2016). A case study of a Chinese/English dual language program in New York city. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Hwang, K.-K. (2016a). Academic self-colonization and crisis of higher education: A comparison between Taiwan and Mainland China. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Hwang, K.-K. (2016b). From cultural rehabilitation to cultural renaissance: Through the education of indigenous social science. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Kotah, S. M. (2016). Shifting paradigm: Reforming Chinese language education in the Philippines. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Kwong, J. (2016). Embedded models of development: Educational changes in the People’s Republic of China. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3483252
Li, J. (2016a). The Chinese model of teacher education: The humanist way for the Chinese learner, teacher and school. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Li, J. (2016b). The Chinese university 3.0 in the global age: History, modernity and future. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Siu, M. K. (2004). Official curriculum in ancient China: How did candidates study for the examination? In N. Y. Wong, L. Fan, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 157–183). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. http://hkumath.hku.hk/~mks/Chapter%206-Siu.pdf
Spangler, J. (2016). Impacts of online education on existing education models: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Stevenson, H., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Sung, K. Y., & Poole, F. (2016). Differences between native and non-native Chinese speaking teachers: Voices from overseas students who study Chinese in China. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Tan, C., & Reyes, V. (2016). Curriculum reform and education policy borrowing in China: Towards a hybrid model of teaching. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Tsai, S.-C. (2016). Perceptions of East Asian students in Canadian graduate schools: What they may indicate about student speech in a Chinese model of education. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Wang, H.-h. (2016a). Dangling between the traditional and the reformist: Reality shocks for student teachers amid the tide of educational reform in a test-oriented culture. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Wang, Z. H. (2016b). Confucian education ideology and its impact on Chinese mathematics teaching and learning. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Yang, R. (2012, November). Higher education reforms in China and their stakeholders: An analysis of the changing roles of losers and winners. Paper presented at BRICS Recent Trends in Higher Education: Analysis around the Pact between Higher Education and Society University of Campinas. Sao Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.gr.unicamp.br/ceav/brics/files/Higher%20Education%20Reforms%20in%20China%20and%20their%20Stakeholders%20-%20An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Changing%20Roles%20of%20Losers%20and%20Winners.pdf
Zhou, Y., & Wang, D. (2016). A Chinese approach to learning? A comparative study on time use patterns of 15-year old students in PISA 2012. In C. P. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age. Singapore: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spangler, J. (2016). Chinese Education Models in a Global Age: Myth or Reality?. In: Chou, C., Spangler, J. (eds) Chinese Education Models in a Global Age. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 31. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0330-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0330-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0328-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0330-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)