Robots and Art pp 47-65

Part of the Cognitive Science and Technology book series (CSAT)

Robotics and Art, Computationalism and Embodiment

Chapter

Abstract

Robotic Art and related practices provide a context in which real-time computational technologies and techniques are deployed for cultural purposes. This practice brings the embodied experientiality, so central to art hard up against the tacit commitment to abstract disembodiment inherent in the computational technologies. In this essay I explore the relevance of post-cognitivist thought to robotics in general, and in particular, questions of materiality and embodiment with respect to robotic art practice—addressing philosophical, aesthetic-theoretical and technical issues.

References

  1. 1.
    Brooks R (1990) Elephants don’t play chess. Robot Auton Syst 6(1990):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brooks R (1985) A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, A.I. Memo No. 864Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks R (1991a) Intelligence without reason. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, A.I. Memo No. 1293Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks R (1991b) Intelligence without representation. Artif Intell J (47):139–159Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burnham J (1968) Beyond modern sculpture; the effects of science and technology on the sculpture of this century. G. Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cariani P (1991). Emergence and artificial life. In: Langton CG, Taylor C, Farmer JD, Rasmussen S (eds) Artificial life II. Sante Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol X. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 775–798Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dreyfus HL (1972) What computers can’t do: a critique of artificial reason. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harnad S (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Phys D 42(1990):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haugeland J (1985) Artificial intelligence: the very idea. Bradford/MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hutchins E (1996) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malafouris L (2007) Before and beyond representation: towards an enactive conception of the palaeolithic image. In: Renfrew C, Morley I (eds) Image and imagination: a global history prehistory of figurative representation. The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp 287–300Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mori M (1970) The Uncanny Valley (trans: MacDorman KF, Minato T). Energy, 7(4), pp 33–35Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newell A, Simon HA (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Commun ACM 19.3:113–126Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Penny S (1987) Simulation, digitization, interaction: the impact of computing on the arts, Artlink V7 #3,4. Art+Tech issueGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Penny S (1989a) Art practice in the age of the thinking machine. Performance 56/7.UKGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Penny S (1989b) Charlie Chaplin, Stelarc and the future of humanity. Artlink V9#1 1989Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Penny S (1995) Paradigms in collision, a tentative taxonomy of interactive art in Schöne Neue Welten. In: Rötzer F (ed) pub Boer, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penny S (1999) Agents as artworks and agent design as artistic practice. In Dautenhahn K (ed) Human cognition and social agent technology, John Benjamins Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pickering A (2010) The cybernetic brain. University of Chicago Press, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Searle J (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3(3):417–457Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Virilio P (1986) War and cinema: the logistics of perception. VersoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whitelaw M (2006) Metacreation: art and artificial life, The MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations