Robots and Art pp 379-401 | Cite as

Designing Robots Creatively

Part of the Cognitive Science and Technology book series (CSAT)


Designing robots creatively involves not only the conceptualisation and realisation of robots that can interact with humans, but demands a focus on the experience of people as they encounter and interact with the robot. This focus on interactant experience requires an understanding of the context of the interaction and the culture within which it will take place, underscoring the importance of the social sciences and creative arts to social robotics; disciplines that have a long history of studying people and their relationships to the spaces that they inhabit. Four case studies of collaborative art-robotics projects are presented to illustrate the process of designing robots creatively, with strong emphasis on creating an engaging experience for people as they interact with the robot.


Electrical Impedance Tomography Humanoid Robot Virtual Character Installation Space Social Message 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Akhmatova A (1998) The complete poems of Anna Akhmatova. In: Reeder R (ed) Hemschemeyer J (trans). Zephyr Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Celeux G, Govaert G (1992) A classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions. Comp Stat Data Anal 14:315–332MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ekman P, Friesen W (1971) Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 17(2):124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodrich MA, Schultz AC (2007) Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends in Human-Comput Interact 1(3):203–275CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harper C, Virk G (2010) Towards the development of international safety standards for human-robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 2(3):229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall E (1966) The hidden dimension. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hochberg Y, Tamhane A (1987) Multiple comparison procedures. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Federation of Robotics (2014) World robotics: service robots, 2013. Accessed 16 September 2013
  9. 9.
    Kanda T, Shiomi M, Miyashita Z, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) An affective guide robot in a shopping mall. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on HRI, pp 173–180, San Diego, USA, 11–13 March 2009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makarenko A, Kaupp T, Grocholsky B, Durrant-Whyte F (2003) Human-robot interactions in active sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, vol 1, pp 247–252, Kobe, Japan, 16–20 July 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moshkina L, Trickett S, Trafton JG (2014) Social engagement in public places. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conferences human-robot interaction, pp 382–389, Bielefeld University, Germany, 3–6 March 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russell S, Norvig P (eds) (2010) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rye D, Velonaki M, Williams S, Scheding S (2005) Fish-Bird: human-robot interaction in a contemporary arts setting. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on robotics and automation, 9 pp, Sydney, Australia, 5–7 Dec 2005Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Šabanović S, Michalowski MP, Simmons R (2006) Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international workshop on advanced motion control, Istanbul, Turkey, 27–29 March 2006. IEEE, pp 576–581Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silvera Tawil D, Rye D, Velonaki M (2012) Interpretation of the modality of touch on an artificial arm covered with an EIT-based sensitive skin. Int J Robot Res 31(1):1627–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silvera-Tawil D, Rye D, Velonaki M (2014) Interpretation of social touch on an artificial arm covered with an EIT-based sensitive skin. Int J Soc Robot 6(4):489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Velonaki M (2014) Human-robot interaction in prepared environments: introducing an element of surprise by reassigning identities in familiar object. In: Lee N (ed) Digital Da Vinci: computers in the arts and sciences. Springer, pp 21–64Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Velonaki M, Rye D, Scheding S, Williams S (2008a) Fish-Bird: a perspective on cross-disciplinary collaboration. IEEE Multimedia 15(1):10–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Velonaki M, Scheding S, Rye D, Durrant-Whyte F (2008b) Shared spaces: media art, computing and robotics. ACM Comput Entertain 6(4):51:1–51:12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NSW Art & DesignThe University of New South WalesPaddingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations