Engineering the Arts

Part of the Cognitive Science and Technology book series (CSAT)


This book is a result of chance encounters, random discussions and a colluding collaboration between an engineer, a scientist and an artist. From the onset, the interdisciplinary nature has set us on a colliding course of ideas, expectations and interests. While interdisciplinary research is celebrated en masse by funding agencies, government bodies and the academia, researchers who embrace interdisciplinarity live a distinctly strenuous life with little recognition for their efforts that appear to fall into the chasm between the established norms and practices of the constituent disciplines. Here, we anecdotally backtrack our journey through the years, homage to the individuals who assume flexible identities, seeking out adventures beyond the confinements of their chosen field.


Robotic Research Public Visibility Human Robot Interaction Uncanny Valley Excellence Award 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Stelarc, Prosthetic Head (2003) New territories. Glasgow, Interactive installationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroos C, Herath DC (2011) Stelarc, “Evoking agency: attention model and behaviour control in a robotic art installation”. MIT Press, LeonardoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19:98–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marsh A (2004) Tracking the PUMA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on the history of electronicsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwok NM, Buchholz J, Fang G, Gal J (2005) Sound source localization: microphone array design and evolutionary estimation. In: ICIT 2005, IEEE international conference on industrial technology, 2005, pp 281–286Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stelarc, Herath DC, Kroos C, Zhang Z (2010) Articulated head. New Interfaces for Musical Expression++, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kroos C, Herath DC, Stelarc (2010) The Articulated head pays attention. In: 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM/IEEE, OsakaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smart WD, Pileggi A, Takayama L (2010) HRI 2010 workshop 1: what do collaborations with the arts have to say about HRI? In: 2010 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on, human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 3–3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson BD (2011) Science fiction prototyping: designing the future with science fiction. Synth Lect Comput Sci 3:1–190Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams M-A (1996) Aesthetics and the explication of surprise. Lang Des 2:145–157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Centred Technology Research CentreFaculty of Education, Science Technology and Mathematics, University of CanberraBruceAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal ProcessingUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations