Skip to main content

Access, Achievement and Outcomes Among Students from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The particular complexities associated with the non-English speaking background (NESB) equity category highlight the need for a more sophisticated equity framework. As will be shown, the definition and identification of the NESB category is problematic, which is compounded by the difficulty of measuring equity outcomes for NESB people in higher education. While NESB people as a whole are well represented in higher education, particular sub-groups are severely under-represented. Moreover, even as single group, NESB people under-achieve at university and are severely disadvantaged in terms of employment after graduation. Hence, the predicament of NESB people highlights the need for a policy approach that targets disadvantage at all points of the higher education lifecycle: access, achievement and graduate outcomes. After providing the background to the creation of the NESB equity category and contextualising its current status, the three stages of the high education lifecycle – access, achievement and graduate outcomes – will be successively used to examine the current predicament of NESB people, as well as the policy implications for the NESB category and equity framework generally.

Some of the content in this chapter has been published in similar forms in (Mestan and Harvey 2014)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This figure was calculated by dividing the number of NESB enrolments by the total number of NESB people in the Australian population. This was the method used in the Bradley Review, whereas the figures from the 1996 Australia Education Council report used the population aged 15–64.

  2. 2.

    The ‘success ratio’, sometimes referred to as the progression ratio, compares the success/ progression rates of a group in question (such as NESB) with another group (such as ESB). A ratio of 1 represents equality between the two groups, more than 1 means that the group succeeds at higher rates, and less than 1 means the group succeeds at lower rates.

  3. 3.

    The Beyond Graduation Survey (BGS) survey was a much smaller sample than the AGS. Consequently, the differences between NESB and ESB students are not statistically significant, unlike the AGS, which is purportedly a census.

References

  • Arkoudis, S., Hawthorne, L., Baik, C., Hawthorne, G., O’Loughlin, K., Leach, D., & Bexley, E. (2009). The impact of English language proficiency and workplace readiness on the employment outcomes of tertiary international students. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Centre for Educational Research (ACER). (2010). Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council. (1996). Equality, diversity, and excellence: Advancing the national higher education equity framework. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2013). Selected higher education statistics – 2013 student data (Appendix 5 – Equity performance data). Canberra: Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2014). Australia’s migration trends 2012–13. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Border Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Survey Research Group. (2011). Settlement outcomes of new arrivals: Report of findings study for Department of Immigration and Citizenship. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Moshe, D., Bertone, S., & Grossman, M. (2008). Refugee access and participation in tertiary education and training. Melbourne: Institute for Community, Ethnicity and Policy Alternatives, Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, B., & Healy, E. (2008). How are skilled migrants doing? People and Place, 16(1 Suppl), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, M., & Doughney, J. (2010). Socio-economic status, cultural diversity and the aspirations of secondary students in the western suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. Higher Education, 59, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne, U., & Hull, O. (2007). Teaching learners from highly oral cultural backgrounds: Good practice guide. Adelaide: NCVER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Clark, D., & Nguyen, T.-H. (2010). Immigration background and the intergenerational correlation in education. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colic-Peisker, V., & Tilbury, F. (2006). Employment niches for recent refugees: Segmented labour market in 21st-century Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colic-Peisker, V., & Tilbury, F. (2007). Integration into the Australian labour market: The experience of three “visibly different” groups of recently arrived refugees. International Migration, 45(1), 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Interdepartmental Committee on Multicultural Affairs. (2001). The guide: Implementing the standards for static on cultural and language diversity. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission. (1986). Access to higher education: Participation equity and policy. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, G., & Zappalà, G. (2002). Factors influencing the educational performance of students from disadvantaged backgrounds. In T. Eardley & B. Bradbury (Eds.), Competing visions: Refereed proceedings of the National Social Policy conference 2001. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEET. (1987). Ethnicity education and equity. Canberra: Department of Employment Education and Training; Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEET. (1993). Equity in higher education: A summary report: Institutional equity plans. Canberra: Department of Employment Education and Training, Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training (DET). (2013). Ethnicity related data: Table 9.1: All domestic students by country of birth, type of attendance and gender, full year 2013. Canberra: Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Training. (1990). A Fair Chance for All: National and institutional planning for equity in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DiAC). (2011). Humanitarian program outcomes for 2010–11 Australian Government. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIICCSRTE. (2011). Higher Education Statistics Publications: Appendix 5 equity performance data: Department of innovation, industry, climate change, science, research and tertiary education. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, I., Birrell, B., & Rapson, V. (1996). The participation of non-English-speaking-background persons in higher education. People and Place, 4(1), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreijmanis, J. (2004). Is graduate employment a right? Higher Education Review, 36(3), 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Birrell, B., & Smith, T. (2005). Unequal entry into university places: Revisting entry into tertiary education in Victoria. Melbourne: Centre of Population and Urban Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equity and Diversity Unit. (2012). Academic language, multiliteracies and multingualism. Retrieved Aug 21, 2012, from http://www.equity.uts.edu.au/language/inclusive/multiliteracies.html

  • Foster, G. (2011). The impact of NESB and international students on measured learning and standards in Australian higher education. Sydney: Australian School of Business, UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good Practice Principles Steering Committee. (2010). English standards for higher education. Canberra: DEEWR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2011). GradStats: Employment and salary outcomes of recent higher education graduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2014a). Australian graduation survey. Melbourne: National data file.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2014b). Australian graduate survey. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/research/surveys/australiangraduatesurvey/

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2014c). Beyond graduation survey. Melbourne: National data file.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebennikov, L., & Skaines, I. (2009). University of Western Sydney students at risk: Profile and opportunities for change. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(1), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, J. (1999). Refugee students at college and university: Improving access and support. International Review of Education, 45(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasmath, R. (2012). The ethnic penalty: Immigration, education and the labour market. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). Equity in Australian higher education: A case of policy stasis. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Baldwin, G., Coates, H., Krause, K.-L., & McInnis, C. (2004). Analysis of equity groups in higher education 1991–2002. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? the influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 10093–11096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, F. (2001). Tutorial experiences of undergraduate Australian and students and international students of non-English speaking background. Sydney: 15th Australian International Education conference proceedings, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjoribanks, K. (2005). Family background, adolescents’ educational aspirations, and Australian young adults’ educational attainment. International Education Journal, 6(1), 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. (2007). Completing university: Characteristics of completing and non-completing students. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research & Department of Education Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., & Fleming, N. (1998). LSAY: Factors influencing youth unemployment in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Council for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Fleming, N., Long, M., & McMillan, J. (2000). Patterns of participation in year 12 and higher education in Australia: Trends and issues. LSAY research reports. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. M. (1994). Equity and general performance indicators in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestan, K., & Harvey, A. (2014). The higher education continuum: Access, achievement and outcomes among students from non-English speaking backgrounds. Higher Education Review, 46(2), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincham, L. (1995). ESL student needs procedures: An approach to language assessment in primary and secondary school contexts. In G. Brindley (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp. 65–91). Sydney: Macquarie University Sydney, NCELTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2012). Capital, ethnicity and higher education. In T. Basit & S. Tomlinson (Eds.), Social inclusion and higher education (pp. 17–40). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2012). Graduate winners: Assessing the public and private benefits of higher education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Multicultural Affairs. (1989). National agenda for a multicultural Australia. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantelides, U. (1999). Meeting the language needs of tertiary NESB students. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 22(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, D., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The activation, appropriation and practices of student-equity policy in Australian higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 29(3), 1–20. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.839829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Institutional Performance Unit (PIPU). (2009–2010). AUSSE system files. Melbourne: PIPU, La Trobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramburuth, P. (2002). Managing language and learning diversity in higher education. In M. Sing (Ed.), Worlds of learning: Globalisation and multicultural education: Common ground. Melbourne: Common Ground Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, R. K., & Taylor, S. (2009). The trials and tribulations of partnerships in refugee settlement services in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 24(6), 655–672. doi:10.1080/02680930802669326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silburn, J., Earnest, J., Butcher, L., & de Mori, G. (2008). Needs analysis of students from refugee backgrounds: A case study from Murdoch University, Western Australia “part of the symposium” The needs of students from refugee backgrounds in tertiary institutions: case studies from Western Australia. Brisbane: Paper presented at the AARE conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L., & Pope, B. (2000). Equity in Australian education and training: An examination of access and outcomes data across the sectors. Canberra: Vocational Education and Training Research Association Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, J. (2004). The ethnic (Dis)advantage debate revisited: Turkish background students in Australia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 25(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Holding, C. (1987). Ministers announce national policy on languages. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemran Mestan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mestan, K. (2016). Access, Achievement and Outcomes Among Students from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds. In: Harvey, A., Burnheim, C., Brett, M. (eds) Student Equity in Australian Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0315-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0315-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0313-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0315-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics