Advertisement

Impact of Local Government Monetary and Fiscal Policies on Output Growth of Firms

  • Changkeun LeeEmail author
  • Euijune Kim
Chapter
  • 431 Downloads
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 25)

Abstract

This study explores the impacts of the monetary and fiscal policies of local governments on the output growth of firms, using multilevel statistical models. It concludes that short-term loans and bonds have a positive influence on output growth but long-term loans have a negative effect, while the effect of paid-in-capital increases is inconclusive and insignificant. A credit guarantee from the local government has the largest impact on the elasticity values of factor inputs and financing amounts with respect to output, compared to other government expenditure programs.

Keywords

Monetary and fiscal policies Multilevel statistical models Bank-based and market-based financial systems Local government Financing options 

References

  1. Beare, J.B. 1976. A monetarist model of regional business cycles. Journal of Regional Science 16: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, T., and R. Levine, 2001. Stock markets, banks, and growth, Policy research working paper, 2670. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Becketti, S., and C. Morris. 1992. Does money still forecast economic activity? Federal reserve bank of Kansas city. Economic Review 77: 65–77.Google Scholar
  4. Boocock, G., and M.N.M. Shariff. 2005. Measuring the effectiveness of credit guarantee schemes: Evidence from Malaysia. International Small Business Journal 23: 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd, J.H., and M. Gertler. 1994. The role of large banks in the recent U.S. Banking crisis. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 18(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, A., and N. Groenewold. 2011. Regional equality and national development in china: Is there a trade-off? Growth and Change 42(4): 628–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowling, M., and P. Mitchell. 1997. The evolution of U.K. self-employment: A study of government policy and the role of the macro economy. The Manchester School 65: 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cumming, D. 2007. Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds. Journal of Business Venturing 22(2): 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deidda, L., and B. Fattouh. 2008. Banks, financial markets and growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation 17(1): 6–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franks, J., and C. Mayer. 1993. German capital markets, corporate control and the obstacles to hostile takeover: Lessons from three case studies, Working paper. London Business School.Google Scholar
  11. Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  12. Goldstein, H. 2003. Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. Guiso, L., T. Jappelli, M. Padula, and M. Pagano. 2004. Financial market integration and economic growth in the EU. Economic Policy 19(40): 524–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison, R.T., C.M. Mason, and P. Girling. 2004. Financial bootstrapping and venture development in the software industry. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 16(4): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooks, L., and T.C. Opler. 1993. The determinants of corporate bank borrowing. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Financial Industry Studies: 1–93.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobides, M.J., T. Knudsen, and M. Augier. 2006. Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy 35(8): 1200–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, R.G., and R. Levine. 1993a. Finance, entrepreneurship and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics 32(3): 513–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, R.G., and R. Levine. 1993b. Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreft, S.F., and R. Sobel. 2005. Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal 25(3): 595–616.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, B.S. 2012. Bank-based and market-based financial systems: Time-series evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 20: 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerner, J. 2002. When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective ‘Public Venture Capital’ programs. The Economic Journal 112: 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levine, R. 2002. Bank-based or market-based financial systems: Which is better? Journal of Financial Intermediation 11: 398–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine, R., and S. Zervos. 1998. Stock markets, banks, and economic growth. The American Economic Review 88(3): 537–558.Google Scholar
  24. Li, W. 2002. Entrepreneurship and government subsidies: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26(11): 1815–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGreal, S., J. Berry, G. Lloyd, and J. McGarthy. 2002. Tax-based mechanisms in urban regeneration: Dublin and Chicago models. Urban Studies 39(10): 1819–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meager, N., P. Bates, and M. Cowling. 2003. An evaluation of business start-up support for young people. National Institute Economic Review 186: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niskanen, W. 1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  28. Oh, I., J. Lee, A. Heshmati, and G. Choi. 2009. Evaluation of credit guarantee policy using propensity score matching. Small and Business Economics 33: 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Opler, T.C. 1993. Controlling financed distress costs in leveraged buyouts with financial innovations. Financial Management 22(3): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson, M.A., and R.G. Rajan. 1994. The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance 49(1): 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porter, M.E. 1992. Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 5(2): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajan, R.G., and L. Zingales. 1998a. Financial dependence and growth. The American Economic Review 88(3): 559–586.Google Scholar
  33. Rajan, R.G., and L. Zingales. 1998b. Which capitalism? Lessons from the East Asian crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11(3): 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rioja, F., and N. Valey. 2004. Does one size fit all? A reexamination of the finance and growth relationship. Journal of Development Economics 74: 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rousseau, P.L., and P. Wachtel. 2002. Inflation thresholds and the finance-growth nexus. Journal of International Money and Finance 21(6): 777–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt, R.H., A. Hackethal, and M. Tyrell. 1999. Disintermediation and the role of banks in Europe: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Intermediation 8: 36–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shin, D.J., and B.H.S. Kim. 2011. Efficiency of the banking industry structure in Korea. Asian Economic Journal 25(4): 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stulz, R.M. 2000. Financial structure, corporate finance, and economic growth. International Review of Finance 1(1): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Takii, K. 2008. Fiscal policy and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 65(3–4): 592–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu, Y., and D.S. Rickman. 2013. US state and local fiscal policies and non-metropolitan area economic performance: A spatial equilibrium analysis. Papers in Regional Science 92(3): 579–598.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Advanced MaterialsSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development and Research Institute of Agricultural and Life ScienceSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations