Issues Raised for Sustainability Through Remanufactured Fashion

  • Pammi SinhaEmail author
  • Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu
  • Geetha Dissanayake
Part of the Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes book series (EFEPP)


Determining origin and sustainability credentials of raw materials and stock are key challenges, affecting transparency and the ability to effectively manage impacts across the supply chain. We have examined the remanufacture process for the fashion company within a mass market environment. Research from WRAP noted that although 81 % of a sample of 4000 men and women had bought at least one item of second-hand clothing, issues that prevented them from buying more regularly were concerns over quality of the garment, a lack of guarantee and lack of durability. (WRAP in Study into consumer second-hand shopping behaviour to identify the reuse displacement effect, 2015). This chapter examines issues regarding the retailing of remanufactured fashion and certification for proof of remanufacture.


Eco-labels Certification Consumer Retailing Proof of remanufacture Niche market 


  1. Austgulen MH, Stø E, Jatkar A (2013) The dualism of eco-labels in the global textile market. In: An integrated Indian and European perspective” paper for OrganizaciónInternacionalAgropecuaria S.A. (OIA), 17 June 2013
  2. Bocken NMP (2015) Sustainable venture capital e catalyst for sustainable start-up success? J Cleaner Prod 1–12 (in press).
  3. Braungart M, McDonough W (2008) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. Vintage Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. CBI (2014) “EU buyer requirements for apparel” CBI, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, Market Information Database,
  5. Claudio L (2007) Waste couture: environmental impact of the clothing industry. Environ Health Perspect 115 (9):448–454Google Scholar
  6. Dissanayake DGK, Sinha P (2012) Sustainable waste management strategies in the fashion industry sector. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 8(1):77–90. The sustainability collection. ISSN 18322077Google Scholar
  7. Dupin C (2003) The shirt off our backs. J Commer
  8. Ecolabel Index (2014)
  9. European Commission (2008) What is integrated product policy?
  10. European Commission (2009) Report on the state of implementation of integrated product policy, the commission to the council, the European parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, SEC(2009)1707, (2007)
  11. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) Determinants of effectiveness for environmental certification and labelling programs. US EPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1998) Environmental labelling, issues, policies, and practices worldwide, pollution prevention division office of pollution, prevention and toxics. USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Ford (2015) Ford certified pre-owned limited warranty,
  14. Gam HJ, Cao H, Farr C, Kang M (2010) Quest for the eco-apparel market: a study of mothers’ willingness to purchase organic cotton clothing for their children. Int J Consum Stud 1–9Google Scholar
  15. Golden JS (ed) (2010) An overview of ecolabels and sustainability certifications in the global marketplace. Duke University, North Carolina, USA,
  16. Hyvarinen A (1999) Eco-labelling and environmentally friendly products and production methods affecting the international trade in textiles and clothing. Senior Market Development Officer, International Trade Centre, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. ISO (2015) ISO 13534:2000(en), petroleum and natural gas industries—drilling and production equipment—Inspection, maintenance, repair and remanufacture of hoisting equipment,
  18. Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G (2001) Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J Consum Mark 18(6):503–52Google Scholar
  19. OECD (2005) effects of eco-labelling schemes: compilation of recent studies, JT00179584,
  20. Piotrowski R, Kratz S (2005) Eco-labelling in globalised economy. In: Pfaller A, Lerch M (eds) Challenges of globalization, Ch. 13. Transaction Publishers, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  21. Shah R (2010) The role of different actors within the textiles—fashion supply chain to understand the issues regarding growth eco-labelled sustainable textiles products (STP). Unpublished MSc by research thesis, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  22. Waste Strategy (2009) Waste management strategy for bexley, 2009–2014. Available at: Higg Index,
  23. Van Rossem C, Tojo N, Lindhqvist T (2006) Extended producer responsibility; an examination of its impact on innovation and greening products. Greenpeace International, Friends of the Earth and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB)Google Scholar
  24. WRAP (2014) Clothing sector agrees challenging targets to cut environmental impact by 15 %
  25. WRAP (2015) Study into consumer second-hand shopping behaviour to identify the re-use displacement effect

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pammi Sinha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu
    • 2
  • Geetha Dissanayake
    • 3
  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.SGS Hong Kong LimitedHong KongHong Kong
  3. 3.University of MoratuwaMoratuwaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations