Abstract
This chapter provides a background to the study including a description of the mathematics achievement gap, the purpose of the research, key terms used, and research questions, and the final section of the chapter offers a summary of the book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Askew, M., & Wiliam, D. (1995). Recent research in mathematics education 5–16. London, England: Office for Standards in Education.
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT). (1997). Numeracy = everyone’s business: The report of the Numeracy Education Strategy Development Conference May 1997. Adelaide, Australia: AAMT.
Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (1999). Raising Australian standards in mathematics and science: Insights from TIMSS. Melbourne, Australia: ACER.
Australian Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1999). Australia’s common and agreed national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Curriculum Perspectives, 19(4), 8–9.
Bass, H., & Kahle, J. B. (1996). Mathematics and science education around the world: What can we learn from the SMSO and the TIMSS. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Baumann, C. & Winzar, H. (2014). The role of secondary education in explaining competitiveness. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. Accessed on 18/06/2015 from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02188791.2014.924387#.Ve95mk2KCUk
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
Board of Studies New South Wales. (2012). NSW syllabus for the Australian curriculum: Mathematics K-10 syllabus. Sydney, Australia: BOS, NSW.
Bright, G., & Joyner, J. (Eds.). (1998). Classroom assessment in mathematics: views from a National Science Foundation working conference. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Cai, J. F. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in US and Chinese students’ solving process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 309–340.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2000). National mathematics curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2012). National mathematics curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education (2011th ed.). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
Clarke, D. (1996). Assessment. In A. J. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 327–370). Dordrecht, Notherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Clarke, D. (2000). Assessment for teaching and learning. Learning Matters, 5(3), 2–5.
Cohen, D. (1998). World league tables: what’s the score? Principal Matters, 10(1), 3–7.
Dossey, J., Peak, L., & Nelson, D. (1997). Essential skills in mathematics: A comparative analysis of American and Japanese assessments of eighth-graders. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Eckstein, M. A., & Noah, H. J. (Eds.). (1992). Examinations: Comparative and international studies. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Gilford, D. M. (Ed.). (1993). A collaborative agenda for improving international comparative studies in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Graf, K., & Leung, F. K. S. (2000). The thirteenth ICMI Study on mathematics education in different cultural traditions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 95–116.
Gu, W. Y. (1997). The differences in mathematics achievement between American Children and Chinese children. ERIC Document 433233.
Howard, P., Perry, B., & Keong, F. H. (2000). Beliefs about mathematics, mathematics learning and mathematics teaching: views of some primary teacher education students in Singapore and Australia. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000: The 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 331–338). Perth: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Husen, T. (1967a). International study of educational achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vol. I). Stockholm, Hamburg, German: Almquist & Wisksell.
Husen, T. (1967b). International study of educational achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vol. II). Stockholm, Hamburg, German: Almquist & Wisksell.
Jurdak, M. (2014). Socio-economic and cultural mediators of mathematics achievement and between school equity in mathematics education at the global level. IDM Mathematics Education, 46, 1025–1037.
Kilpatrick, J. (1995). Curriculum change locally and globally. In R. P. Hunting, G. E. Fitzsimons, P. C. Clarkson, & A. J. Bishop (Eds.), Regional collaboration in mathematics education: an ICMI Regional conference 1995 (pp. 19–29). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.
Kloosterman, P. (1988). Self-confidence and motivation in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 345–351.
Lajoie, S. P. (1995). A framework for authentic assessment in mathematics. In T. Romberg (Ed.), Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment (pp. 19–37). Albany, New York: Suny Press.
Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A., & Askew, J. M. (1992). Learning mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (Eds.). (1992). Assessment and learning of mathematics. Melbourne, Australia: Australia Council for Educational Research.
Leung, F. K. S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(4), 297–325.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Mathematics education in East Asia and West: Does culture matter? In A presentation prepared for the 13th ICMI comparative study conference. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
Lin, F. L. (2001). The pressure for high achievement in Taiwanese education. Dialogues, 2001(11). http://www.nctm.org/dialogues/2001/20022213.htm. Accessed on December 16, 2001.
Lindquist, M. (2001). NAEP, TIMSS, and PSSM: Entangled influences. School Science and Mathematics, 101(6), 289–291.
Little, A., & Wolf, A. (Eds.). (1996). Assessment in transition: Learning, monitoring and selection: An international perspectives. Oxford, New York: Pergamon.
Lokan, J., & Doig, B. (Eds.). (1997). Learning from children: Mathematics from a classroom perspective. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Lokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1997). Maths & science on the line: Australian middle primary students’ performance in the third international mathematics and science study. Melbourne, Australia: Australia Council for Educational Research.
Ma, L. P. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, M., Mullis, I., Gregory, K., Hoyle, C., & Shen, C. (2000). Effective schools in science and mathematics. Massachusetts: Boston College.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Beaton, A., Gonzalez, E., Kelly, D. & Smith, T. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study. Massachusetts: Canter for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Massachusetts: Centre for the study of Testing, Evaluation and Education Policy, Boston College.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Garden, R., O’Connor, K., Chrostowski, S. & Smith, T. (2000). TIMSS 1999: international mathematics reports, finding from IEA’s repeat of third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade. Massachusetts: Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
National Institute on Educational Governance, Finance, Policymaking, and Management. (1998). What the TIMSS means for systemic school improvement: Perspectives on education policy research. Washington DC: Author.
Ng, S. F. (2001). The Singapore story: A nation’s effort to develop human resources. http://www.nctm.org/dialogues/2001/20022202.htm. Accessed on December 16, 2001.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Knowledge and skills for life: First results for PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2001). Competencies for the knowledge economy: Education policy analysis 2001. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do-students’ performance in mathematics, reading and science (volume 1, Revised). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Robitaille, D. F. (1997). National contexts for mathematics and science education: An encyclopaedia of education systems participating in TIMSS. Vancouver, Canada: Pacific Educational Press.
Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics II: Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics. Oxford, New york: Pergamon.
Rowland, T., & Ruthven, K. (2011). Mathematical knowledge in teaching. New York: Springer.
Sanders, B. J., Parkay, F. W., Shen, J. l., & Xin, T. (1998). A Cross-national comparison of fourth-grade mathematics instruction in the United States and China. ERIC Document 421344.
Shimizu, Y. (2001). Why the mathematics performance of Japanese students is higher than that of students in Western countries: Listening to the voices from the inside. http://www.nctm.org/dialogues/2001/20022204.htm. Accessed on December 16, 2001.
Stearns, R. E. (1998). A comparison of education in China and the United States. ERIC: ED429924.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. New York: Springer.
Taylor, D. S., & Jenkins, E. W. (Eds.). (2000). Learning from others. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Theisen, G., & Adams, D. (1990). Comparative education research. In R. M. Thomas (Ed.), International comparative education: practices, issues & prospects (pp. 277–298). New York: Pergammon.
Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (Eds.). (1989). The IEA study of mathematics: Analysis of mathematics curricula. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
United Nation Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2000). Education for all: No excuses. New York: UNCIEF.
Wang, J. (1998). A content examination of the TIMSS items. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(1), 36–38.
Webb, N. L. (1992). Assessment of students’ knowledge of mathematics: Steps toward a theory. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 661–683). New York: Macmillan.
Whang, W. H. (2001). Speculating on the high achievement of Korean students. http://www.nctm.org/dialogues/2001/20022214.htm. Accessed on December 16, 2001.
Zhao, D. (1999). For the students’ future: A review of the reform on high school assessment in New South Wales. Studies in Foreign Education, 26(4), 18–22.
Zhao, D. (2000). Establishing an evaluation system suitable for quality education: A review of the evaluation system of primary school pupils in Australia. Studies in Foreign Education, 27(1), 39–43.
Zhao, D., Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2006). Case studies on mathematics assessment practices in Australian and Chinese primary schools. In F. K. S. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 261–276). New York: Springer.
Zhao, D., & Singh, M. (2011). Why do Chinese-Australian students outperform their Australian peers in mathematics: A comparative case study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 69–87.
Zhu, W. (1992). Confucius and traditional Chinese education: an assessment. In R. Hayhoe (Ed.), Education and modernization: the Chinese experience. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhao, D. (2016). Introduction: Chinese Students Outperform in Mathematics. In: Chinese Students' Higher Achievement in Mathematics. Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0285-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0285-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0283-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0285-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)