Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taking Action Using Systems Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Guide to Systems Research

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 10))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to guide you to conduct your systems research project. It will start suggesting some ways to establish a research project based on traditional project management principles and compare it with ways in which a systems researcher might set a research project. It will then explain the importance of constructing a methodology for your research project and point out why systems researchers often adopt multimethodologies to carry out research. The chapter will then focus on how systems interventions can be developed to contribute to your research methodology with examples of multimethodology and systemic action research interventions that have been successfully used by prominent systems researchers in different contexts. The chapter will then take you through some steps normally used in conducting a research project, with an emphasis on systems research, covering an overview of research methods, negotiating relationships to get access to research sites, data collection and analysis methods, and ways to demonstrate rigor. Since this chapter covers a wide area, bridging systems interventions to ways in which conventional research is carried out, it will focus more on how systems interventions can be set up and implemented and provide a variety of references to help the reader find adequate information to carry out research expected of doctoral studies or research reports. It will also make reference to other chapters in the book to guide the readers to take effective action to complete a research project successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1953). The design of social research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. (1999). Recreating the corporation: A design of organizations for the 21st century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agile Methodology. (2008, October 23). What is agile? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://agilemethodology.org/

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, R. J., Macadam, R. D., Packham, R. J., & Valentine, I. (1984). Systems thinking and practices in education of agriculturalists. Agricultural Systems, 13, 205–225, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(84)90074-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. (2007). Using visual data in qualitative research. London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 7–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T., & Pooley, R. (2013). Rich pictures: Collaborative communication through icons. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26, 361–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9238-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, O., & Nguyen, N. (2015). Systems thinking for everyone: The journey from theory to making a project. Kingston, Australia: Think2 Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, O. J. H., Nguyen, N. C., Maeno, T., & Yasui, T. (2013). Managing complex issues through Evolutionary Learning Laboratories. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30, 116–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2171

  • Bowers, T. D. (2011). Towards a framework for multiparadigm multimethodologies. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(5), 537–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.1120

  • Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. (2007). Systemic action research: A strategy for whole systems change. Bristol, United Kingdom: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. (2014). Systemic action research: Changing system dynamics to support sustainable change. Action Research, 12(1), 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750313513910

  • Burns, D., & Worsley, S. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Warwickshire, United Kingdom: Practical Action Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of Systems thinking for the 1990s. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(9), 757–767. doi:10.1057/jors.1985.141.

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft systems methodology. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 191–242). London, United Kingdom: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.2.B37

  • Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. I., & Arnoff, E. L. (1957). Introduction to operations research. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. Berkshire, United Kingdom: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2001). Action research: Action and research. In S. Sankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield, & P. Swepson (Eds.), Effective change management using action learning and action research: Concepts, frameworks, processes and applications (pp. 21–27). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2002, July 12). Action research and evaluation online: Session 3—Entry and contracting. Retrieved from http://www.aral.com.au/areol/areol-session03.html

  • Emmison, M., Smith, P., & Mayall, M. (2012). Researching the visual (2nd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., Gruba, P., & Zobel, J. (2014). How to write a better thesis (3rd ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04286-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2008). Managing quality in qualitative research. London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1995). Total systems intervention (TSI): A reconstitution. The Journal of Operational Research Society, 46(2), 174–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2583987

  • Flood, R., & Jackson M. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total system intervention. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world. London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK guide (2013, 5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. London, United Kingdom: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. London, United Kingdom: Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann, J. R., Chuma, E., Murwira, K., Connolly, M., & Fiarcelli, P. (2002). Success factors in integrated natural resource management R&D: Lessons from practice. Conservation Ecology, 5(2), Art. 29. Retrieved from http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art29/

  • International Council on Systems Engineering. (n.d.). What is systems engineering? Retrieved from http://www.incose.org/AboutSE/WhatIsSE

  • International Council on Systems Engineering. (2015). INCOSE systems engineering handbook: A guide to system life cycle processes and activities. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. (2010). Systemic practice: How to act in a climate-change world. London, United Kingdom: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossiakoff, A., & Sweet, W. N. (2003). Systems engineering principles and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S. (2012). Narrative analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 492–511). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, G. S. (2016). Systems research model: A comparison of research methodologies as action research. In M. C. Edson, P. Buckle Henning, & S. Shankaran (Eds.), A guide to systems research: Philosophies, processes and practice (pp. 199–234). Singapore: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0263-2_8

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2011). Theoretical pluralism in systemic action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9176-2

  • Midgley, G., Munlo, I., & Brown, M. (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 467–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3009885

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, R. (2006). Realising systems thinking: Knowledge and action in management science. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework of mixing methodologies. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 25(5), 489–509. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooz, H., & Forsberg, K. (2001). A visual explanation of development methods and strategies including the waterfall, spiral, Vee, Vee+, and Vee++ Models. Proceedings of the INCOSE International Symposium, 11(1), 610–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. (2013). Efficient and effective research: A toolkit for research students and developing researchers. Adelaide, Australia: AIB Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2010). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (5th ed.). Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinzòn, L., & Midgley, G. (2000). Developing a systemic model for the evaluation of conflicts. Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences, 17, 493–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011/12)17:6<493::AID-SRES334>3.0.CO;2-5

  • Pratchett, T. (2010). I shall wear midnight (Discworld Book 38). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran, S., & Dick, B. (2015). Linking theory and practice in using action-oriented methods. In B. Pasian (Ed.), Designs, methods and practices for research of project management (pp. 211–224). Aldershot, United Kingdom: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarah, R., Haslett, T., Molineux, J., Olsen, J., Stephens, J., Tepe, S., & Walker, B. (2002). Business action research in practice: A strategic conversation about conducting action research in business organizations. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(6), 535–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021068805269

  • Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selener, D. (1997). Participatory action research and social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Participatory Action Research Network, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (2010). Approaches to social research (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Felderhof, L., & Bosch, O. J. H. (2007). Adaptive management: Making it happen through participatory system analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24, 567–587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.835

  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Belmont, CA: Spradley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (2013). Action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2008). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1996). A primer for critical systems heuristics for action researchers. Hull, United Kingdom: Centre for Systems Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, P. W., Vogt, E. R., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2014). Selecting the right analysis for your data: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, Y. (2010). Building in research and evaluation: Human inquiry for living systems. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingate, L. M. (2015). Project management for research and development: Guiding innovation for positive R&D outcomes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, R. K. (2013). Effective project management: Traditional, agile and extreme (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Organizational Project Management, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Shankar Sankaran

Authors
  1. Shankar Sankaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Federation for Systems Research, Vienna, Austria

    Mary C. Edson

  2. Adelphi University , Garden City, New York, USA

    Pamela Buckle Henning

  3. University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia

    Shankar Sankaran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sankaran, S. (2017). Taking Action Using Systems Research. In: Edson, M., Buckle Henning, P., Sankaran, S. (eds) A Guide to Systems Research. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 10. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0263-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation