Abstract
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a degenerative disease of the central nervous system. This work performs a four-class classification using the motor assessments of subjects obtained from the Parkinson’s Progressive Markers Initiative (PPMI) database and a variety of techniques like Deep Neural Network (DNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Belief Network (DBN) etc. The effect of using feature selection was also studied. Due to the skewness of the data, while evaluating the performance of the classifier, along with accuracy other metrics like precision, recall and F1-score were also used. The best classification performance was obtained when a feature selection technique based on Joint Mutual Information (JMI) was used for selecting the features that were then used as input to the classification algorithm like SVM. Such a combination of SVM and feature selection algorithm based on JMI yielded an average classification accuracy of 87.34 % and an F1-score of 0.84.
Keywords
- PPMI
- Motor assessments
- Multi-class classification
- Feature selection
- SVM
- DNN
- Dropout
- DBN
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Marek, K., Jennings, D., Lasch, S., Siderowf, A., Tanner, C., Simuni, T., et al.: The parkinson progression marker initiative (PPMI). Prog. Neurobiol. 95, 629–635 (2011)
Babu, G.S., Suresh, S.: Parkinson’s disease prediction using gene expression-A projection based learning meta-cognitive neural classifier approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 1519–1529. Elsevier (2013)
Das, R.: A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 1568–1572. Elsevier (2010)
Hazan, H., Hilu, D., Manevitz, L., Ramig, L.O., Sapir, S.: Early diagnosis of parkinson’s disease via machine learning on speech data. In: 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel (IEEEI), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012)
Mandal, I., Sairam, N.: Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis using robust inference system. Int. J. Med. Informatics 82, 359–377 (2013)
Rustempasic, I., Can, M.: Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using fuzzy C-means clustering and pattern recognition. SouthEast Europe J. Soft Comput. 2, 42–49 (2013)
Tsanas, A., Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Spielman, J., Ramig L.O.: Novel speech signal processing algorithms for high-accuracy classification of Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59, 1264–1271 (2012)
Costin, H., Geman, O.: Parkinson’s disease prediction based on multistate markov models. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 8, 525–537 (2013)
Daliri, M.R.: Chi-square distance kernel of the gaits for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 8, 66–70. Elsevier (2013)
Haller, S., Badoud, S., Nguyen, D., Garibotto, V., Lovblad, K.O., Burkhard, P.R.: Individual detection of patients with Parkinson disease using support vector machine analysis of diffusion tensor imaging data: initial results. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 2123–2128 (2012)
Martínez-Murcia, F.J., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Illán, I.A., Ortiz, A.: The Parkinson’s progression markers initiative.: automatic detection of parkinsonism using significance measures and component analysis in DaTSCAN imaging. Neurocomputing 126, 58–70. Elsevier (2014)
Prasanth, R., Roy, S.D., Mandal, P.K., Ghosh, S.: Automatic classification and prediction models for early Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from SPECT imaging. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 3333–3342. Elsevier (2014)
Segovia, F., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Álvarez, I., Jiménez-Hoyuela, J.M., Ortega, S.J.: Improved Parkinsonism diagnosis using a partial least squares based approach. Med. Phys. 39, 4395–4403 (2012)
Armañanzas, R., Bielza, C., Chaudhuri, K.R., Martinez-Martin, P., Larrañaga, P.: Unveiling relevant non-motor Parkinson’s disease severity symptoms using a machine learning approach. Artif. Intell. Med. 58, 195–202. Elsevier (2013)
Babu, G.S., Suresh, S., Mahanand, B.S.: A novel PBL-McRBFN-RFE approach for identification of critical brain regions responsible for Parkinson’s disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 478–488. Elsevier (2014)
Gil, David, Johnson, Magnus: Diagnosing parkinson by using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 9(4), 63–71 (2009)
Hoehn, M.M., Yahr, M.D.: Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17, 427–442 (1967)
Fleuret, F.: Fast binary feature selection with conditional mutual information. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 1531–1555 (2004)
Yang, H.H., Moody, J.E.: Data visualization and feature selection: new algorithms for nongaussian data. In: NIPS, pp. 687–702 (1999)
Meyer, P.E., Bontempi, G.: On the use of variable complementarity for feature selection in cancer classification. In: EvoWorkshops 2006: EvoBIO, LNCS, pp. 91–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948)
Brown, G., Pocock, A., Zhao, M.J., Luján, M.: Conditional likelihood maximisation: a unifying framework for information theoretic feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 27–66 (2012)
Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297. Springer (1995)
Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(27), 1–27 (2011)
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.A.: Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: ICML ’08 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1096–1103. ACM, New York (2008)
Palm, R.B.: Prediction as a candidate for learning deep hierarchical models of data. Master’s Thesis. Technical University of Denmark. IMM-M.Sc.-2012-31 (2012)
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014)
Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18, 1527–1554 (2006)
Acknowledgments
PPMI—a public-private partnership—is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners, including [list the full names of all of the PPMI funding partners found at http://www.ppmi-info.org/fundingpartners].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Deena, P.F., Raimond, K. (2016). Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for the Identification of the Stages of Parkinson’s Disease. In: Senthilkumar, M., Ramasamy, V., Sheen, S., Veeramani, C., Bonato, A., Batten, L. (eds) Computational Intelligence, Cyber Security and Computational Models. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 412. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0251-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0251-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0250-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0251-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)