Advertisement

Overviewing Causality or Over-Interpreting Noise: Is Modern Neuroscience Shaping Our View of the Human Mind?

  • Kim C. Wende
  • Andreas Jansen
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics book series (ICCN)

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the pros and cons of noise in macro—as compared to microscopic research approaches of modern neuroscience. In the context of the respective field we mostly regard subsets of neural processes/functions. Comparing macroscopic and microscopic theoretical approaches to the human mind and cognition (i.e., top-down with bottom-up explanations of effects/behavior) leads us to the comparison of brain imaging/psychophysical methods—we approach this comparison qualitatively, arguing for a combination of measures and a more dimensional view on the human mind in neuroscientific theory.

Keywords

Neuroimaging Brain–mind problem Cognition Relatedness Schizophrenia 

References

  1. 1.
    Libet, B., Wright, E.W., Gleason, C.A.: Readiness potentials preceding unrestricted spontaneous pre-planned motor acts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 54, 322–325 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreasen, N.C., Flaum, M.: Schizophrenia: the characteristic symptoms. Schizophr. Bull. 17, 27–49 (1991)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeLisi, L.E.: Speech disorder in schizophrenia: review of the literature and exploration of its relation to the uniquely human capacity for language. Schizophr. Bull. 27, 481–496 (2001)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fletcher, P.C., Frith, C.D.: Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10(1), 48–58 (2009)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corlett, P.R., Murray, G.K., Honey, G.D., Aitken, M.R., Shanks, D.R., Robbins, T.W., Bullmore, E.T., Dickinson, A., Fletcher, P.C.: Disrupted prediction-error signal in psychosis: evidence for an associative account of delusions. Brain 130, 2387–2440 (2007)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tschacher, W., Kupper, Z.: Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophr. Bull. 32, 106–112 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blakemore, S.J., Sarfati, Y., Bazin, N., Decety, J.: The detection of intentional contingencies in simple animations in patients with delusions of persecution. Psychol. Med. 33, 1433–1441 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wende, K.C., Nagels, A., Stratmann, M., Chatterjee, A., Kircher, T., Straube, B.: Neural basis of altered physical and social causality judgments in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 161, 244–251 (2015)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crow, T.J.: The XY gene hypothesis of psychosis: origins and current status. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatric Genet. 162(8), (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crow, T.J.: Schizophrenia as the price that homo sapiens pays for language: a resolution of the central paradox in the origin of the species. Brain Res. Rev. 31(2000), 118–129 (2000)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Price, C.J.: The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. United States, 1191 62–88, (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansen, A., Foel, A., Van Randenborgh, J., Konrad, C., Rotte, M., Forster, A.F., Deppe, M., Knecht, S.: Crossed cerebro-cerebellar language dominance. Hum. Brain Mapp. 24, 165–172 (2005)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wende, K.C., Straube, B., Stratmann, M., Sommer, J., Kircher, T., Nagels, A.: Neural correlates of continuous causal word generation. Neuroimage 62, 1399–1407 (2012)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ashburner, J., Friston, K.J.: Voxel-based morphometry. The methods. NeuroImage 11, 805–821 (2000)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bora, E., Yucel, M., Pantelis, C.: Theory of mind impairment in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Schizophr. Res. Netherlands, 109, 1–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ioannidis, J.P.: Excess significance bias in the literature on brain volume abnormalities. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 773–780 (2011)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uttal, W.R.: Hypothetical high-Level cognitive functions cannot be localized in the brain: another argument for a revisited behaviorism. Behav. Anal. 27, 1–6 (2004)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donaldson, D.I.: Parsing brain activity with fMRI and mixed designs: what kind of a state is neuroimaging in? Trends Neurosci. 27, 442–444 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mobbs, D, Hall, S.: A reply to uttal (2004). Behav. Anal. 28(1) (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costafreda, S.G.: Pooling fMRI data: meta-analysis, mega-analysis and multi-center studies. Front. Neuroinform. 3(33), (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prado, J., Chada, A., Booth, J.R.: The brain network for deductive reasoning: a quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroimaging studies. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23(11), 3483–3497 (2011)PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Innocenti, G.M., Ansermet, F., Parnas, J.: Schizophrenia, neurodevelopment and corpus callosum. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 261–274 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wende, K.C., Nagels, A., Blos, J., Stratmann, M., Chatterjee, A., Kircher, T., Straube, B.: Differences and communalities in the judgment of causality in a physical and social context: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 51, 2572–2580 (2013)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dhamala, M., Rangarajan, G., Ding, M.: Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality. Neuroimage 41, 354–362 (2008)PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R.R., Szirmák, Z., Nagy, J.: The five-factor personality inventory as a measure of the five-factor model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment 11, 207–215 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Neurosciences IoNs, Groupe COSYUniversité catholique de Louvain UCLBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Brain-imaging, Clinic for Psychiatry and PsychotherapyPhilipps-University MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations