Skip to main content

Evaluation of Safety in Biomarker Driven Multiple Agent Phase IB Trial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Biostatistical Methods and Applications in Clinical Oncology
  • 840 Accesses

Abstract

Tyner and colleagues in the Center for Hematological Malignancies, Knight Cancer Institute, at the Oregon Health & Science University have recently developed a novel kinase-inhibitor assay and rapid mutation screening to identify molecularly targeted drugs to which patient leukemic cells are sensitive. As a proof of concept and feasibility trial, they proposed a phase IB trial focusing on feasibility and safety of an assay-based kinase-inhibitor treatment assignment in combination with the standard induction chemotherapy among newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients. Because each patient receives one of five kinase inhibitors in combination with standard chemotherapy, the sample size for each kinase inhibitor group is varied and limited. In addition, there is a different toxicity profile associated with each inhibitor, making safety assessment challenging. We will discuss a continuous toxicity monitoring plan in biomarker driven, multiple agent feasibility and safety trials, and evaluate its operating characteristics in a simulation study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(1):23–47. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(2):119. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(3):181–2. (PubMed PMID: 11814064).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breems DA, Van Putten WL, Huijgens PC, Ossenkoppele GJ, Verhoef GE, Verdonck LF, Vellenga E, De Greef GE, Jacky E, Van der Lelie J, Boogaerts MA, Löwenberg B. Prognostic index for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):1969–78 Epub 2005 Jan 4 (PubMed PMID: 15632409).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giles F, O’Brien S, Cortes J, Verstovsek S, Bueso-Ramos C, Shan J, Pierce S, Garcia-Manero G, Keating M, Kantarjian H. Outcome of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia after second salvage therapy. Cancer. 2005;104(3):547–54 (PubMed PMID: 15973664).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khwaja A, Bjorkholm M, Gale RE, Levine RL, Jordan CT, Ehninger G, Bloomfield CD, Estey E, Burnett A, Cornelissen JJ, Scheinberg DA, Bouscary D, Linch DC. Acute myeloid leukaemia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;10(2):16010. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.10 (PubMed PMID: 27159408).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maxson JE, Gotlib J, Pollyea DA, Fleischman AG, Agarwal A, Eide CA, Bottomly D, Wilmot B, McWeeney SK, Tognon CE, Pond JB, Collins RH, Goueli B, Oh ST, Deininger MW, Chang BH, Loriaux MM, Druker BJ, Tyner JW. Oncogenic CSF3R mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical CML. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(19):1781–90. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214514 (PubMedPMID:23656643; PubMedCentralPMCID: PMC3730275).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivanova A, Qaqish BF, Schell MJ. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology. Biometrics. 2005;61(2):540–5 (PubMed PMID: 16011702).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pocock SJ. Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Biometrika. 1977;64(2):191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jennison C, Turnbull BW. Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang D, Gnecco C, Geller NL. Design of group sequential clinical trials with multiple endpoints. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84(407):776–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye Y, Li A, Liu L, Yao B. A group sequential Holm procedure with multiple primary endpoints. Stat Med 2012; Stat Med. 2013;32(7):1112–24. doi:10.1002/sim.5700. Epub 2012 Dec 14. PMID: 23239078.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motomi Mori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mori, M., Daffé, R., Park, B.S., Tyner, J. (2017). Evaluation of Safety in Biomarker Driven Multiple Agent Phase IB Trial. In: Matsui, S., Crowley, J. (eds) Frontiers of Biostatistical Methods and Applications in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0126-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics