Skip to main content

Statistical Challenges with the Advances in Cancer Therapies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Biostatistical Methods and Applications in Clinical Oncology
  • 850 Accesses

Abstract

Statistical challenges in designing, analyzing and interpreting the data are being encountered with the recent development of new classes of drugs to treat cancer. The existing paradigm of drug development from Phase I to Phase III clinical trials is not optimal. New and innovative trial designs and statistical methods are needed to evaluate the new classes of drugs. In this chapter we present the regulatory considerations in the evaluation of drug products, the drug development paradigm in the last century and the current time, and the statistical challenges that need to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mile stones in U.S. Food and Drug law history. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/History/Milestones/ucm128305.htm.

  2. 21 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 314.126.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FDA Guidance for Industry: Providing Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness for Human Drugs and Biological Products. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kane RC, et al. Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:7271–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hodi FS, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman PB, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hauschild A, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:358–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakelee H, et al. Cooperative group research efforts in lung cancer 2008: focus on advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2008;9:346–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freidlin B, Simon R. Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7872–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freidlin B, et al. The cross-validated adaptive signature design. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:691–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Redman MW, Crowley JJ, Herbst RS, Hirsch FR, Gandara DR. Design of a phase III clinical trial with prospective biomarker validation: SWOG S0819. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(15):4004–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simon N, Simon R. Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials. Biostatistics. 2013;14:613–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta C, et al. Biomarker driven population enrichment for adaptive oncology trials with time to event endpoints. Stat Med. 2014;33:4515–31.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Barker AD, et al. I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Phamacol Ther. 2009;86:97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herbst RS, et al. Lung master protocol (Lung MAP)—a biomarker-driven protocol for accelerating development of therapies for squamous cell lung cancer: SWOG S1400. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1514–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Cancer Institute Press Release. NCI-MATCH trial will link targeted cancer drugs to gene abnormalities. 2015. http://www.cancer.gov/news-events/press-releases/2015/nci-match.

  18. Sridhara R, et al. Current statistical challenges in oncology clinical trials in the era of targeted therapy. Stat Biopharm Res. 2015;7(4):348–56. doi:10.1080/19466315.2015.1094673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. In vitro companion diagnostic devices: Guidance to Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. 2014. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM262327.pdf.

  20. Kazandjian D, et al. FDA approval summary: Nivolumab for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Onclologist. 2016;21:634–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pembrolizumab product label: Section 14.1, Figure 2. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/125514s004s006lbl.pdf.

  22. Nivolumab product label: Section 14. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/125554s001lbl.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeshwari Sridhara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sridhara, R. (2017). Statistical Challenges with the Advances in Cancer Therapies. In: Matsui, S., Crowley, J. (eds) Frontiers of Biostatistical Methods and Applications in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0126-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics