Advertisement

The Feasibility of Large-Scale Composting of Waste Wool

  • Gwendolyn HustvedtEmail author
  • Erica Meier
  • Tina Waliczek
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes book series (EFEPP)

Abstract

Although wool remains a popular fiber due to its durability, comfort, and ease of quality production, increasing the sustainability of wool fashion products requires attention to all portions of the wool life cycle, including production of sheep to provide the wool. Managing sheep in many regions of the globe results in excess or waste wool that is not suitable for the textile or fashion supply chain. One way to increase the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of wool production is to compost the waste wool into soil amendments and landscaping aids that can provide producers with additional income, provide horticulturalists with an environmentally friendly alternative to other soil amendments, and provide communities that depend on sheep a pride in the value of all parts of the life cycle. This chapter outlines an experimental study that was conducted to determine the proper proportions of sheep waste products to other biomass that would be needed in a large-scale composting operation in order to produce a high-quality compost valuable to the horticulture and agriculture industries. The results of an experimental trial with waste wool determined that a 25 % waste wool, 50 % grass clipping, and 25 % horse stall waste mixture provided the optimal results for composting in a large-scale manner. Separation of compacted wool, if transported in wrapped bundles, proved essential for allowing sufficient decomposition of the waste wool. The composting produced was tested and determined to be of acceptable quality.

Keywords

Waste management Life cycle Biomass Wool Sheep Composting 

References

  1. Animut G, Goetsch AL (2008) Co-grazing of sheep and goats: benefits and constraints. Small Rumin Res 77(2):127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Das KC, Tollner EW, Annis PA (1997) Bioconversion of wool industry solid wastes to value-added products. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/10336. Accessed 31 Aug 2015
  3. Dougherty M (ed) (1999) Field guide to on-farm composting. Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Emerson D (2003) Building strong markets for mulch and compost products. Biocycle 44(7):36–40Google Scholar
  5. Górecki RS, Górecki MT (2010) Utilization of waste wool as substrate amendment in pot cultivation of tomato, sweet pepper, and eggplant. Pol J Environ Stud 19:1083–1087Google Scholar
  6. Hermansen JE (2003) Organic livestock production systems and appropriate development in relation to public expectations. Livest Prod Sci 80(1):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoppenheidt K, Kottmair A, Mücke W et al (2000) Influence of organofluorine-treated textiles on biowaste composting. Text Res J 70(1):84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. International Wool Textile Organization (2015) Facts. http://www.iwto.org/about-iwto/vision-mission/. Accessed 31 Aug 2015
  9. Jones KG (2004) Trends in the U.S. Sheep Industry. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Information Bulletin Number 787Google Scholar
  10. Martin DL, Gershuny G (eds) (1992) The Rodale book of composting. Rodale Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Montoya J, Waliczek TM, Abbott M (2013) Large-scale composting as a means of managing water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6(2):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Research Council (2008) Changes in the Sheep Industry in the United States. http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/SheepFinal.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2015
  13. Pearson J, Lu F, Gandhi K (2004) Disposal of wool scouring sludge by composting. Department of Textiles. University of Huddersfield, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  14. Phillips H (1936) Some fundamental principles of raw wool washing. J Textile Inst Proc 27(7):208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pennsylvania State University (2002) Compost analysis: Sampling and mailing procedure. Agricultural Analytical Services Laboratory. Pennsylvania State University University Park PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Poston T (2006) Using the wool no-one wants. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5317358.stm. Accessed 31 Aug 2015
  17. Rook E (2008) Pteridium aquilinum, bracken fern. Ferns and Fern Allies of the Boundary Waters Wilderness and North Woods. http://www.rook.org/earl/bwca/nature/ferns/pteridiumaqui.html. Accessed 31 Aug 2015
  18. Rynk R (1992) On-farm composting handbook. National Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. United States Composting Council (2010) Seal of testing assurance. http://www.compostingcouncil.org. Accessed 26 Feb 2010
  20. United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] (n.d.) Profile for Pteridium aquilinum (western brackenfern). National Plant Data Center. Natural Resources Conservation Service. United States Department of Agriculture. http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed 26 Feb 2010
  21. Weise A, Sween J, Bean B et al (1998) High temperature composting of feedlot manure kills weed seeds. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 14(4):377–380Google Scholar
  22. Wildeus S (1997) Hair sheep genetic resources and their contribution to diversified small ruminant production in the United States. J Anim Sci 75(3):630–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zheljazkov VD (2005) Assessment of wool waste and hair waste as soil amendment and nutrient source. J Environ Qual 34(6):2310–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zheljazkov VD, Stratton Pincock GW, Butler J et al (2009) Wool-waste as organic nutrient source for container-grown plants. Waste Manag 29(7):2160–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zoccola M, Montarsolo A, Mossotti R et al (2014) Green hydrolysis conversion of wool wastes into organic nitrogen fertilisers. In: 2nd international conference on sustainable solid waste management, pp 1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gwendolyn Hustvedt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Erica Meier
    • 2
  • Tina Waliczek
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Family and Consumer SciencesTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgricultureTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations