Spatial Impacts of Endogenously Determined Infrastructure Investment
We address three questions: Do infrastructure investments impact on local incomes, population and land values? Do these effects spill over into neighbouring regions? Is infrastructure investment a response to local developments? We outline a theoretical framework and estimate a simultaneous equation growth model of infrastructure investment, real incomes, population and land values. The model, estimated by spatial three-stage least squares, uses New Zealand functional labour market panel data. We find that infrastructure investment increases population and incomes, but is itself endogenously determined and subject to positive spatial spillovers. Thus a self-reinforcing cycle exists between local incomes and infrastructure investment.
KeywordsInfrastructure Economic growth Migration Land values
We thank seminar audiences at the University of St Andrews, University of Waikato, University of Auckland and Motu Economic and Public Policy Research for helpful comments on earlier versions. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the views expressed.
Funding This work was supported by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology [MOTU-0601] and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [Resilient Urban Futures].
- Biehl D (ed) (1986) The contribution of infrastructure to regional development final report of the infrastructure studies group to the Commission of the European Communities. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Bom P, Ligthart J (2009) What have we learned from the three decades of research on the productivity of public capital? Working Paper, Tilburg UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Boyle P, Halfacree K, Robinson V (1998) Exploring contemporary migration. Longman, HarlowGoogle Scholar
- Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gibbons S, Lyytikainen T, Overman H, Sanchis-Guarner R (2012) New road infrastructure: the effects on firms, SERC Discussion Paper 117. Spatial Economics Research Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Griffith D (1996) Some guidelines for specifying the geographic weights matrix contained in spatial statistical models. In: Arlinghaus S (ed) Practical handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 65–82Google Scholar
- Grimes A (2014) Infrastructure and regional economic growth. In: Fischer M, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional science. Springer, Heidelberg, Chapter 28Google Scholar
- Grimes A, Liang Y (2010) Bridge to somewhere: valuing Auckland’s northern motorway extensions. J Transp Econ Pol 44(3):287–315Google Scholar
- Hirschman A (1958) The strategy of economic development. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Hulten CR, Schwab RM (1991) Public capital formation and the growth of regional manufacturing industries. Nat Tax J 44(4):121–134Google Scholar
- McLuskey W, Aitken A, Grimes A, Kerr S, Timmins J (2006) Rating systems in New Zealand: an empirical investigation into local choice. J Real Estate Lit 14(3):381–397Google Scholar
- Moretti E (2011) Local labor markets. In: Ashenfeiter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 4, Part B. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1237–1313Google Scholar
- Newell JO, Papps KL (2001) Identifying functional labour market areas in New Zealand: a reconnaissance study using travel-to-work data, Occasional Paper Series No 2001/6. Department of Labour, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Nurske R (1953) Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- ONS, Coombes MG (1998) 1991- travel to work areas. Office for National Statistics, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Reich R (1991) The real economy. Atl Mon 267(2):35–52Google Scholar
- Schabenberger O, Gotway CA (2005) Statistical methods for spatial data analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar