Skip to main content

Renewable Resources, Environmental Pollution, and International Migration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1111 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 27))

Abstract

To realize optimal management of trans-boundary renewable resources is very hard because not only is international cooperation indispensable, but several economic aspects should also be considered. In the familiar case of Japan and China, for example, East China Sea is a hot spot between the two countries. Not only is a natural gas field, which sometimes causes territorial conflicts, located just close to the border but the area is also quite rich in marine resources. As fishes are a trans-boundary renewable resource, international cooperation is required for its management. However, this is difficult to establish, and overfishing is common. For an optimal resource management policy between Japan and China, we need to consider two important aspects that have been ignored in previous studies. The first is environmental pollution caused by the smokestack manufacturing industry, which generates negative externalities on the stock of renewable resources. We focus on environmental pollution in the East China Sea, which comes mainly from China because of relatively poor pollution abatement technologies. Environmental pollution from industrial production has become one most serious problems of the world, which is difficult to solve because underdeveloped countries, without sufficient skills and funding, usually cannot control pollution well. Moreover, their governments often give priority to economic growth over protection of the environment. The second aspect is international factor mobility. Not only international trade strategies but also FDI and migration policies should be considered important for optimal economic management. Migration from China to Japan, which is the focus of this study, is not very large now, but the potential wage gap may cause a flood of labor mobility in the near future.

This paper was originally published by the International Economy as an article in its Vol. 14 (2014) issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The pioneering study by Copeland and Taylor (1999) extended David Ricardo’s relative advantage model to examine the natural recovery of environmental resources and analyze the economic welfare effects of international specialization and trade. Suga (2001) introduced differences between two countries’ pollution rates and permitted a realistic possibility of trans-boundary pollution. Ito and Tawada (2003) studied the effects of the transfer of pollution abatement technology from a developed to an underdeveloped country. Several studies have focused on the environmental industry. Chua (2003) examined emission tax effects on the trade pattern with a three-sector model in which one sector is the nontradable pollution abatement service industry. Sugiyama (2003) also studied the effects of environmental policies with a two-sector model in which one sector produces pollution abatement equipment. Abe and Sugiyama (2010) analyzed the structure of comparative advantage determined by international differences in environmental policies with a model incorporating pollution abatement equipment, and they examined the effects of an environmental policy in an open economy.

  2. 2.

    See Kondoh (2006, 2007, 2009) and Kondoh and Yabuuchi (2012). Those articles are reissued in Chap. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of this book.

  3. 3.

    We need to confirm that private incentive of each worker essentially causes international migration from the country with lower wage. Socially, under certain conditions shown in the text, international labor mobility may cause negative effects on the economy of both the source and host countries, but this itself cannot stop migration in case that migrants gain.

  4. 4.

    For example, some kind of fish cannot freeze well without losing their qualities.

  5. 5.

    See Wong (1995), for example.

References

  • Abe, K., & Sugiyama, Y. (2010). The environmental industry, environmental policies, and international trade. The International Economy, 14, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J. A., & Taylor, M. S. (1997). International trade and open access renewable resources: The small open economy case. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30, 526–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J. A., & Taylor, M. S. (1998). Open-access renewable resources: Trade and trade policy in a two-country model. Journal of International Economics, 44, 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulte, E. H., & Damania, R. (2005). A note on trade liberalization and common pool resources. Canadian Journal of Economics, 38, 883–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1993). North–south trade and the dynamics of renewable resources. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 4, 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, S. (2003). Does tighter environmental policy lead to a comparative advantage in less polluting goods? Oxford Economic Papers, 55, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1999). Trade, spatial separation and the environment. Journal of International Economics, 47, 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. (2005). Trade and the enforcement of environmental property rights. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 14, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, A., & Tawada, M. (2003). Environment, trade and the welfare gains from the transfer of pollution abatement technology. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 519–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinji, N. (2007). International trade and renewable resource under asymmetries of resource abundance and resource management. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 621–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh, K. (2006). Trans-boundary pollution and international migration. Review of International Economics, 14, 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh, K. (2007). Trans-boundary pollution and brain drain migration. Review of Development Economics, 11, 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh, K. (2009). Pollution abatement equipment and international migration. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh, K. (2014). Renewable resources, environmental pollution, and international migration. The International Economy, 17, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh, K., & Yabuuchi, S. (2012). Unemployment, environmental policy, and international migration. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 21, 677–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, M. (2004). Sharing the benefits of cooperation in the Norwegian spring-spawning herring fishery. International Game Theory Review, 6, 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, G. R. (1979). The optimal management of trans-boundary renewable resource. Canadian Journal of Economics, 12, 355–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suga, N. (2001). The analysis of global environmental pollution and international Trade. Studies in Regional Science, 32, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, Y. (2003). Emission tax, subsidy to input of the pollution abatement equipment and international trade. The International Economy, 8, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takarada, Y. (2009). Transboundary renewable resource and international trade (RIETI discussion paper series 09-E-041).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vislie, J. (1987). On the optimal management of trans-boundary renewable resource: A comment on Munro’s paper. Canadian Journal of Economics, 20, 870–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y. (1995). International trade in goods and factor mobility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kondoh, K. (2017). Renewable Resources, Environmental Pollution, and International Migration. In: The Economics of International Immigration. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 27. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0092-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0092-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0091-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0092-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics