Mobile Learning, Student Concerns and Attitudes

Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


In this paper, examples of the current methods of employment in mobile learning, both in schools and in independent projects is presented and commented. After that, statistical data collected in a survey of students is given, concerning student’s opinions about the use of mobile services in mLearning, reasons for such a situation with, and attitudes about the future possible use. This data is accompanied with the ideas about the proper method of application of mobile learning not only in formal environment in schools, but also in an informal environment. Suggestion of this paper is to develop and organize mLearning as an addition, enhancement and supplement to both classic classroom and already accepted “classic” eLearning, because of ample additional possibilities for use of mobile technology in any type of education.


Mobile Phone Mobile Device Smart Phone Mobile Technology Mobile Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Corbeil, J. R., Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are You Ready for Mobile Learning. Retrieved from the EDUCAUSE review website:
  2. Fayyoumi, A., Mohammad, H., & Faris, H. (2013). Mobile based learning and examination: students and instructors perception from different Arab countries. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 6, 662–669. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2013.612079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frydenberg, M. E. (2007). Teaching and learning information technology with mobile devices. IADIS International Journal of Internet /WWW, 4(2), 34–45.Google Scholar
  4. Homan, S., & Wood, K. (2003). Taming the mega-picture: Wireless quizzing. Syllabus Magazine, 7–8 October 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Ivanović, M., Putnik, Z., & Budimac, Z. (2010). eLearning in Serbia: The state and development of e-Learning in Serbia. In Cases on challenges facing e-learning and national development: institutional studies and practice (Anadolu University-2010, pp. 773–797). Eskisehir, Turkey.Google Scholar
  6. Ivanović, M., Putnik, Z., Komlenov, Ž., Welzer, T., Hölbl, M., & Schweighofer, T. (2013). Usability and privacy aspects of moodle—students’ and teachers’ perspective. Informatica, An International Journal of Computing and Informatics, 37(3), 221–230.Google Scholar
  7. Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z., Putnik, Z., & Komlenov, Ž. (2014). Encouraging teamwork, Web 2.0 and social networking elements in distance learning. In Overcoming challenges in software engineering education: delivering non-technical knowledge and skills. doi:  10.4018/978-1-4666-5800-4.ch005, (pp. 26–45). Hershey, USA: IGI Global.
  8. Litchfield, A., Dyson, L. E., Lawrence, E., Zmijewska, A. (2007). Directions for m-learning research to enhance active learning. Paper presented at the ascilite Singapore ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, pp. 587–596, Singapore.Google Scholar
  9. McConatha, D., & Praul, M. (2007). Mobile learning in the classroom: An empirical assessment of a new tool for students and teachers. Paper presented at the Washington Interactive Technologies Conference, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49, 581–596. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Organista-Sandoval, J., & Serrano-Santoyo, A. (2014). Appropriation and educational uses of mobile phones by students and teachers at a public university in Mexico. Creative Education, 5, 1053–1063. doi:  10.4236/ce.2014.512119.
  12. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5) (MCB University Press). doi:  10.1108/10748120110424816.
  13. Putnik, Z. (2014). Contributions to the development of eLearning—Possibilities for conversion of learning activities and materials into electronic form, (Doctoral Thesis, University of Novi Sad, Serbia) (in Serbian). doi:  10.2298/NS20140214PUTNIK.
  14. Putnik, Z., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2014). Web 2.0 in educational practice—a decade of experience. Paper presented at the international conference on e-Learning’14, Tenerife, Spain, (pp. 194–200).Google Scholar
  15. SRI International. (2013). Client Sponsored Research & Development. Retrieved from
  16. Tough, A. (1979). The adult’s learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning, 2nd edn. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Pfeiffer & Co. (April 1979).Google Scholar
  17. Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), (Special issue—Mobile learning).Google Scholar
  18. Trninić, Ž. (2013, June). Jubilees—One hundred and thirty years of telephones in Serbia, JAT New Review.Google Scholar
  19. Vavoula, G., & Karagiannidis, C. (2005). Designing mobile learning experiences. Advances in Informatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3746, 534–544. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Wikipedia. (2015). Economy of Serbia. Retrieved from
  21. Zanela Saccol, A., Reinhard, N., Barbosa, J. L. V., & Schlemmer, E. (2010). m-Learning (mobile learning) in practice: A training experience with IT professionals. Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 261–280.Google Scholar
  22. Zdravkova, K., Ivanović, M., & Putnik, Z. (2012). Experience of integrating Web 2.0 technologies. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(2), 361–381. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9228-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations