Skip to main content

Epilogue to Paradoxes in Education

  • Chapter
Paradoxes in Education

Abstract

The authors of this book have focussed on issues emerging from their many different educational roles. These include class teaching; prison education; advisory/specialist functions (national/international); therapeutics; school/college/university leadership and management; teacher-training; lecturing; researching and education policy development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antinori, A. (2017). Self-improvement. Journal of Research in Personality.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI/Pearson. (2017). Education and skills survey: Helping the UK thrive. Retrieved from www.cbi.com

  • Crockett, M., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Siegel, J., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. (2017). The value of morality. Nature Neuroscience, 20(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, J., & Cikara, M. (2017). People Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Intergroup Neuroscience Lab. Ecology Global Network: http//:www.ecology.com/birth-death-rates/

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Endowment Foundation. (2017). Dialogic teaching. Cambridge, MA: Review Trust and York University. Retrieved from educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/our-work

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, B. L. (2017). How emotions are made. London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Brett, C., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. (2016). Personality stability from age 14 to 77 years. Psychology & Aging, 31(8), 862–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of enquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 151–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. (2017). Person as scientist, person as moralist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, J. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality, in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oderberg, D. (2007). Real essentialism. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, R. (2004). The world of difference. London: Network Continuum. (Reprint 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaarschmidt, T. (2017, May/June). Power moves. Scientific American: MIND, 28(3). Retrieved from Scientific American.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F. (2016). On the aesthetic education of man. London: Penguin Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton Trust. (2017). The state of social mobility in the UK. London: Sutton Trust. Retrieved from www.suttontrust.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Usborne, S. (2017, April 22). The last word. The Week, (11211). Retrieved April 24, 2017, from www.theweek.co.uk

  • West, G. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability and the pace of life in organisms and companies. London: Penguin Random House/Orion.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adeniji, J. et al. (2017). Epilogue to Paradoxes in Education. In: Paradoxes in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-185-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-185-8_15

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-185-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics