Skip to main content

What Does Academic Freedom Mean for Academics?

A Case Study of the University of Bologna and the National University of Singapore

  • Chapter
The University as a Critical Institution?

Part of the book series: Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series ((CHER))

Abstract

The aspiration towards academic freedom is not new for the academic community. From the Middle Ages on, universities struggled against the influence of local communities to pursue teaching and learning for the sake of knowledge (Zonta, 2002). At that time they were backed up by the two strongest powers, the Pope and the Emperor. These central authorities understood universities as institutions capable of securing the ideological support and the intellectual framework to maintain the unity of the Christian world and the Holy Roman Empire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AAUP (American Association of University Professors). (1970[1925]). 1940 statement of principles of academic freedom and tenure with 1970 interpretative comments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alma Mater Studiorium. (2013). Strategic plan 2013–2015. Retrieved 20 Mai 2016 from http://www.unibo.it/en/university/who-we-are/strategic-plan

  • Altbach, P. G. (2001). Academic freedom: International realties and challenges. Higher Education, 41, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). University autonomy in 20 countries. Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Young Affaires. Retrieved 20 Mai 2016 from http://www.magna-charta.org/resources/files/University_autonomy_in_20_countries.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballarino, G., & Perotti, L. (2012). The bologna process in Italy. European Journal of Education, 47(3), 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, (3), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau. (2015). Five defences of academic freedom in North American higher education. In P. Zgaga, U. Teichler, H. G. Schuetz, & A. Wolter (Eds.), Higher education reform: Looking back – looking forward. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Government. (2011, June 22). Danish government 2011 (Vol. 695). Retrieved 12 July 2016 from http://ufm.dk/en/legislation/prevailing-laws-and-regulations/education/files/the-danish-universityact.pdf

  • DIH (Deutsches Italienisches Hochschulzentrum). (2014). Riforma Gelmini: Die Italienische Bildungsreform. Retrieved 25 November 2014 from http://www.deutschitalienischeshochschulzentrum.org/page.asp?pag=1675

  • Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Palerari, S. (2015). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EHEA (European Higher Education Area). (2007). Bologna process national reports 2005–2007 Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä, T., & Piironen, O. (2014). Shifting fundaments of European higher education governance: Competition, ranking, autonomy and accountability. Comparative Higher Education, 50(2), 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S. (2000). University autonomy and external dependencies. In G. Neaves (Ed.), The universities’ responsibilities to society: International perspectives. Amsterdam, Lausanne, New York, Oxford, Shannon, Singapore, Tokyo: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2001). Forming the academic profession in East Asia: A comparative analysis. New York, NY, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative and Legal Service. (2013). Higher education act unofficial consolidates text (ZViS-NPB10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzato, G., & Moscati, R. (2007). University reform in Italy: Fears, expectations and contradictions. In A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht, the Netherland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magna Charta Observatory. (2016[1988]). The magna charta universitatum. Retrieved 02 August 2016 from http://www.magna-charta.org/magna-charta-universitatum/the-magna-charta-1/the-magnacharta

  • Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the confucian model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscati, R. (2009). The implementation of the bologna process in Italy. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscati, R. (2012). University governance in changing European systems of higher education. In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Valsceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads: Between the bologna process and national reforms. Part 1. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, H., & Wong, P. K. (2011). The national university of Singapore and the university of Malaya: Common roots and different paths. In P. G. Altbach & J. Salmi (Eds.), The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUS (National University of Singapore). (2016a). NUS at a Glance 2016/2017. Retrieved 15 August 2016 from http://www.nus.edu.sg/images/resources/content/about/glance-en.pdf

  • NUS (National University of Singapore). (2016b). Statutes and regulations of the national university of Singapore. Retrieved 15 August 2016 from http://www.nus.edu.sg/registrar/info/statutes/NUSStatutesRegulations-Full.pdf

  • Rüegg, W. (2002). The Europe of universities: Their tradition, function of bridging across Europe, liberal modernization. In N. Sanz & S. Bergan (Eds.) The heritage of European universities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüegg, W. (2011). A history of the university in Europe: Universities since 1945 (Vol. 4). Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senato della Repubblica. (1948). Constitution of the Italian republic. Parliamentary Information Archives and Publication Office of the Senate Service for Official Reports and Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Law Revision Commission. (1987). Education act chapter 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Law Revision Commission. (1999). Constitution of the republic of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Law Revision Commission. (2006). National university of Singapore (Corporatisation) act chapter 204A.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Law Revision Commission. (2014). Singapore management university act chapter 302A.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1997). Recommendation concerning the status of higher-education teaching personnel. Retrieved 15 December 2016 from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13144&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P.-K., Ho, Y.-P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “Entrepreneurial University” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the national university of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, S. (2015). Higher education reform: Why did it start and has it ended? In P. Zgaga, U. Teichler, H. G. Schuetze, & A. Wolter (Eds.), Higher education reform: Looking back – looking forward. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zgaga, P. (2012). Reconsidering university autonomy and governance: From academic freedom to institutional autonomy. In H. G. Schütz, W. A. Bruneau, & G. Grosjean (Eds.), University governance and reform: Policy, fads, and experience in national perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zgaga, P., Teichler, U., Schuetze, H. G., & Wolter, A. (2015). Introduction: Reforming higher education for a changing world. In P. Zgaga, U. Teichler, H. G. Schuetz, & A. Wolter (Eds.), Higher education reform: Looking back – looking forward. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha, Q. (2012). Intellectuals, academic freedom, and autonomy: In university governance and reform. In H. G. Schütz, W. A. Bruneau, & G. Grosjean (Eds.), University governance and reform: Policy, fads, and experience in national perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonta, C. A. (2002). The history of European universities: Overview and background. In N. Sanz & S. Bergan (Eds.), The heritage of European universities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Westa, S. (2017). What Does Academic Freedom Mean for Academics?. In: Deem, R., Eggins, H. (eds) The University as a Critical Institution?. Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-116-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-116-2_5

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-116-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics