Skip to main content
  • 428 Accesses

Abstract

Globally higher education is situated in a supercomplex world (Barnett, 2000) that is constantly in a state of flux and subject to multiple pressures. This situation has been exacerbated in South African higher education that has been characterised by student protests in the last two years (2015–2016). One of the major causes for the recents protests, particularly in our institutional context, has been students’ anger that despite the official demise of apartheid and the end of colonial rule, some universities in South Africa are still attempting to be copies of Oxford and Harvard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnes, D. (1975). From communication to curriculum. Harmandsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belluigi, D. (2012). Provoking ethical relationships. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Reimagining academic staff development: Spaces for disruption (pp. 119–144). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Critical perspectives series, Rev ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge, S. (2013). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughey, C., & McKenna, S. (2015). Analysing an audit cycle: A critical realist account. Studies in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1072148

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. (2009). Innovative practices in service-learning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2015). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 4(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2012). Decolonization and the pedagogy of solidarity. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2002). Academic identity in transformation? The case of the United Kingdom. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(3), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawitz, J. (2009). Academic identities and communities of practice in a professional discipline. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2013). Knowledge and knowers: Towards realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2015). Decolonizing knowledge and the question of the archive (Public lecture). Johannesburg: Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research (WISER).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, S. (2012). Interrogating the academic project. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Reimagining academic staff development: Spaces for disruption (pp. 15–26). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, I. (2004). Curriculum responsiveness: The anatomy of a concept. In H. Griesel (Ed.), Curriculum responsiveness: Case studies in higher education (pp. 1–20). Pretoria: SAUVCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, W. (1994). Entitlement and achievement in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13(1), 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyoka, B. (2013). Negation and affirmation: A critique of sociology in South Africa. African Sociological Review, 17(1), 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, L. (2012). Introduction. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Reimagining academic staff development: Spaces for disruption (pp. 1–14). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I., Yeld, N., & Hendry, J. (2007). A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education (Higher education monitor, No. 6). Pretoria, RSA: Council on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British higher education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierer, B. (2008). Learning to write about teaching: Understanding the writing demands of lecturer development programmes in higher education. In R. Murray (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 34–45). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorster, J., & Quinn, L. (2012). Theorising the pedagogy of a formal programme for university lecturers. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Reimagining academic staff development: Spaces for disruption (pp. 51–69). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorster, J., & Quinn, L. (2012a). Privileging knowledge, creating knowers: An analysis of a formal programme for university lecturers. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Reimagining academic staff development. Spaces for disruption (pp. 71–88). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vorster, JA., Quinn, L. (2017). Re-Framing Academic Staff Development. In: Kinchin, I.M., Winstone, N.E. (eds) Pedagogic Frailty and Resilience in the University. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-983-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-983-6_8

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-983-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics