Skip to main content

Pedagogics in Home Economics Meet Everyday Life

Crossing Boundaries and Developing Insight in Finland and Japan

  • Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to describe home economics as both an academic discipline and a science. First, it provides insights into home economics education in the Finnish and Japanese contexts by giving examples of both cultures. Second, it reviews the previous research on improving the quality of learning in an academic context (i.e., in higher education) by stressing the pedagogical and science educational approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antikainen, A., & Pitkänen, A. (2014). A history of educational reforms in Finland. In R. R. Verdugo (Ed.), Educational Reform in Europe: History, culture, and ideology (pp. 1–24). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai, N. (2014). Home economics as citizenship education in Japan: The creative challenge of curriculum and practice. Journal of Japan Association of Home Economics Education, 56(4), 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai, N. (2012). The advancement of home economics education in the post-war era. In Home Economics Education in Japan 2012 (pp. 23–37). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Association of Home Economics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, M., Wilska, T.-A., Kaartinen, R., & Lähteenmaa, J. (2009). The use of small instant loans among young adults: A gateway to a consumer insolvency? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(4), 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, E. E. (1991). The home economics movement: A “new” integrative paradigm. Journal of Home Economics, 83, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkman, S. J. (1996). Food science: Applying chemistry, microbiology, and technology to the study of food. The Science Teacher, 1, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2000). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the student does. Suffolk, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press, & St. Edmundsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. M. (1980). What is Home Economics Education? Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, K. E. (1996). Ethics: The heart of home economics. In C. B. Simerly, H. Light, & D. I. Mitstifer (Eds.), A Book of Readings: The context for professionals in human, family and consumer sciences (pp. 47–150). Alexandria, VA: American Association of Family and Consumer Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, C. A. (1995). An evolving historical paradigm: From “home economics” to “family and consumer sciences.” Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 19, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. L. (1993). Perspectives on home economics: Unity and identity. Journal of Home Economics, 85(4), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. R. (1994). Capturing teachers’ knowledge: Performance assessment: a) and post-structuralist epistemology b) from a post-structuralist perspective, c) and post-structuralism, d) none of the above. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • FNBE (Finnish National Board of Education). (2014). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Retrieved August 15, 2015, from http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf

  • Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Teaching for understanding and application of science knowledge. School Science & Mathematics, 10(6), 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, H. (1991). Definition and philosophy of home economics: A conceptual framework. Canadian Home Economics Journal, 41, 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, C. M. (2012). Creating Consumers: Home economics in twentieth-century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. B. (2001). Our intellectual ecology: A treatise on home economics. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 93(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaparanta, L., & Niiniluoto, I. (1986). Johdatus tieteelliseen ajatteluun [An introduction to scientific thinking] (Helsingin yliopiston filosofian laitoksen julkaisuja, No. 3). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen, S., & Kosonen, A.-L. (2013). Do Finnish home economics and health education textbooks promote constructivist learning in nutrition education? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(3), 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, A. (2015). Indoctrination or education? Intention of unqualified teachers to transfer consumption norms in home economics teaching. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6), 682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höijer, K., Hjälmeskog, K., & Fjellström, C. (2011). “Food with a purpose” – Home economics teachers’ construction of food and home. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(5), 514–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janhonen, K., Mäkelä, J., & Palojoki, P. (2016). Adolescents’ school lunch practices as an educational resource. Health Education, 116(3), 292–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janhonen-Abruquah, H., & Palojoki, P. (2005). Good practice in multicultural integration work in Finland: Collaborative learning in culturally sensitive projects. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaartinen-Koutaniemi, M., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Personal epistemology of university students: Individual profiles. Education Research International, Article ID 807645, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaartinen-Koutaniemi, M., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Personal epistemology of psychology, theology and pharmacy students: A comparative study. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, L. K., & Rauma, A.-L. (1998). Kotitalouden ja tekstiilityönopettajien koulutus Savonlinnassa [Educating home economics teachers in Savonlinna]. In L. K. Kaukinen & A.-L. Rauma (Eds.), Kotitalouden ja tekstiilityön opettajien koulutusta Joensuun yliopistossa Savonlinnassa (Kasvatustieteiden tiedekunnan selosteita, No. 71, pp. 3–7). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellet, C. (1994). Family diversity and difference: A challenge for change. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 3, 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivilehto, S. (1998). Science education and development of thinking in teaching baking in home economics. In K. Turkki (Ed.), New Approaches to the Study of Everyday Life: Proceedings of the International Household & Family Research Conference (Department of Home Economics and Craft Science, Research Reports, No. 4, pp. 56–60). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laster, J. F. (1998). Assessment of practical reasoning. In Family and Consumer Sciences Teacher Education: Yearbook 18 (pp. 47–74). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laster, J. F. (2008). Nurturing critical literacy through practical problem solving. Journal of the Japan Association of Home Economics Education, 50(4), 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. L. T. (2011). Home economics as an integrated, holistic system: Revisiting Bubolz and Sontag’s 1988 human ecology approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. (2003). Uusien tieteiden synty: Kuusi mallia [Six models of the development of new sciences]. In I. Niiniluoto (Ed.), Totuuden rakastaminen: Tieteenfilosofisia esseitä (pp. 131–142). Helsinki, Finland: Otava. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, B., & Marra, R. M. (2004). College student epistemological perspectives across knowledge domains: A proposed grounded theory. Higher Education, 47(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterat, L., & Smith, G. (2000). Conceptualizing practice through dialogue among professional home economists. Canadian Home Economics Journal, 50, 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R. 1989. Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and dispositions in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauma, A.-L. (2005). Kotitaloustiede on nuori ihmistiede [Home economics is a young human science]. In J. Enkenberg, E. Savolainen, & P. Väisänen (Eds.), Tutkiva opettajankoulutus – taitava opettaja (pp. 199–208). Savonlinnan opettajankoulutuslaitos, Joensuun yliopisto. http://sokl.joensuu.fi/verkkojulkaisut/tutkivaope/polla_kroger.htm (In Finnish)

  • Rauma, A.-L., & Väisänen, P. (2003a). Encouraging a science orientation in home economics. American Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 4(94), 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauma, A.-L., & Väisänen, P. (2003b). Kotitaloutta integroiden – LUMA-tiedeopetuskokeilu opettajien täydennyskoulutuskurssilla [Integrating natural sciences and mathematics with home economics. A science experiment in in-service training]. Kasvatus, 4(34), 402–415. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauma, A.-L., Himanen, R., & Väisänen, P. (2006). Integration of science and mathematics into home economics teaching: A way to improve the quality of learning? Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 24(1), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, M. L. (1999). Learning a new language. In Family and Consumer Science Teacher Education: Yearbook 19 (pp. 58–69). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. V. (2000). The postmodern perspective on home economics history. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 92(1), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-Functioning Society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (2001). John Dewey’s conundrum: Can democratic schools empower? Teachers College Record, 103(2), 267–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (2014). What’s in a name? Epistemology, “epistemology,” and science education. Science Education, 98(3), 372–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education? Science and Education, 13(6), 553–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soo, L. M. J., & Chua, S. K. C. (2014). The 21st-century approach in teaching home economics: A Singapore perspective. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 20, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sysiharju, A.-L. (1995). Naisasian tytär – muuttuvien kotien tuki 1891–1990: Vuosisata kotitalousopettajan koulutusta Helsingissä [A daughter of the women’s rights movement – Support for homes in constant change. A century of the education of home economics teachers in Helsinki] (Tutkimuksia, No. 148). Helsinki, Finland: Opettajankoulutuslaitos, Helsingin yliopisto. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Korzh A., & Wentland, A. (2006). “They probably aren’t named Rachel”: Young children’s scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(3), 559–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkki, K. (2005). Pre-professionals’ perceptions of home economics in Finland. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(3), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Palojoki, P. (2000). Studying human action in the household: The contribution of contextual approaches. Canadian Home Economics Journal, 50(3), 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • UEF//Opinto-opas 2015–2016. (2015). [UEF/Course catalogue 2015–2016]. P. Peltoperä (Ed.). Joensuu, Finland: Soveltavan kasvatustieteen ja opettajankoulutuksen osasto, Filosofinen tiedekunta, Itä-Suomen yliopisto. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaines, E. (1993). An empowerment orientation for home economics. Home Economics FORUM, 6(2), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaines, E. (1994). Ecology as a unifying theme for home economics/human ecology. Canadian Home Economics Journal, 44, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väisänen, P., & Rauma, A.-L. (2003, September). Science teaching method as a means of professional learning. Paper presented at the ECER Conference, Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved August 15, 2015, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003163.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E. M. (2014). Understanding the heterogeneous nature of science: A comprehensive notion of PCK for scientific literacy. Science Education, 98(3), 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, H., & Enkenberg, J. (2013). Reflections of design-oriented pedagogy for sustainable learning: An international perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagi, M. (2012). Home economics teacher training in higher education of Japan. In Home Economics Education in Japan 2012 (pp. 81–91). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Association of Home Economics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F.-Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educational Horizons, 86(3), 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, T. M. (1999). Critical examination of human ecology paradigm and critical science paradigm as appropriate paradigms of home economics. Journal of Asian Regional Association for Home Economics, 6, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G. (2012). A cultural perspective of conceptual change: Re-examining the goal of science education. Journal of Education, 47(1), 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elorinne, AL., Arai, N., Autio, M. (2017). Pedagogics in Home Economics Meet Everyday Life. In: Kimonen, E., Nevalainen, R. (eds) Reforming Teaching and Teacher Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_6

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-917-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics