Advertisement

Professional Learning that Matters

A Whole School Approach
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Professional Learning book series (PROFL)

Abstract

An enduring issue associated with educational change is related to the tension between the individualism of teaching and the social nature of learning. That tension exists in two ways for teachers. The first is that the development of pedagogical expertise is typically viewed as an outcome of learning from experience about classroom teaching. Generally, that learning is from reflection on experiences in which the ‘data’ from trialling and experimenting with practice is developed, collected and analysed by the individual teacher in relation to their own work. Inevitably then, it can be difficult to reframe (Schön, 1983) situations beyond the individual teacher’s perspective.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, A., Loughran, J., & van Driel, J. (2008). Returning to the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bullough, R. V. J. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: A study in the history of an idea. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: DC. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  5. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
  6. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). London: Routlege.Google Scholar
  8. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes: A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.Google Scholar
  10. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loughran, J. J. (2010). What expert teachers do: Teachers’ professional knowledge of classroom practice. London: Allen & Unwin, Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Loughran, J. J., & Northfield, J. R. (1996). Opening the classroom door: Teacher, researcher, learner. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  13. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Shafto, P., Goodman, N. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2014). A rational account of pedagogical reasoning: Teaching by, and learning from, examples. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 55–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations