Abstract
Is the title of this chapter a contentious statement? Perhaps. Either way the response, for me is largely emotional, and divulges more about how and why I think about risk as opposed to the definition per se. Whenever the word risk is passed around in conversation it is quite often interpreted as being negative. It is a term frequently used and acted upon in a student’s learning development, but how is it acted upon by a teacher? Do we ever associate our professional learning with risk? Just as we ask students to take risks so too, I would argue, we should put ourselves in a position where the end product may not be known and we are forced to challenge our current thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Loughran, J. (2010). What expert teachers do. London/Sydney: Allen & Unwin/Routledge press.
Rajammal, T. S. (2016). Teacher effectiveness in relation to emotional intelligence and teaching aptitude among D.T. Ed. teacher trainees. India: Ashok Yakkaldevi.
Rockoff, J, E., & Speroni, C. (2011). Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness: Evidence from New York City. Labour Economics, 18(5), 687–696.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Rieber, R. W. (1988). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and Speech (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Philipp, E. (2017). Risk is Positive. In: Smith, K., Loughran, J. (eds) Quality Learning. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-914-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-914-0_13
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-914-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)