Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.
Collins, D. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 845–849.
Compos, A., Gomez-Juncal, R., & Perez-Fabello, M. J. (2007–2008). Experience in imagery and imagery vividness. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality, 27(4), 337–348.
diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331.
Einstein, A. (2003). Physics and reality. Daedalus, 132(4), 22–25. (Original work published 1936)
Eisner, E. W. (2002). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18, 4–16.
Feynman, R. (1963). Curved space, Chapter 42 of The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol.1.
Felder, R. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286–290.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
Geary, D. C., & Soto, M. C. (2001). Sex differences in spatial abilities among adults from the United States and China: Implications for evolutionary theory. Evolution and Cognition, 7(2), 172–177.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. London: Wiley & Sons.
Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar (Lincoln Center Institute Lectures on Aesthetic Education). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hadamard, J. (1945/1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945; New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1954.
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 978–1003.
Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual–spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446–474.
Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689.
John-Steiner, V. (1997). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking (Rev. Ed., pp. 1–294). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kendrick, M., & McKay, R. (2002). Uncovering literacy narratives through children’s drawings. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(1), 45–60.
Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial vs. object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 710–726.
Levrini, O. (1999). Teaching modern physics on the basis of a content knowledge reconstruction. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/projekte/esera/ book/118-lev. pdf
Livio, M. (2005). The equation that couldn’t be solved: Chapter 1 (Symmetry) and Chapter 2 (eyE s’dniM eth ni yrtemmyS). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Miller, A. I. (1989). Imagery and intuition in creative scientific thinking: Albert Einstein’s invention of the special theory of relativity. In D. Wallace & H. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 171–185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Osborne, J. (1990). Sacred cows in physics—Towards a redefinition of physics education. Physics Education, 25, 189–195.
Pesic, P. (2014). Music and the making of modern science. London: MIT Press.
Pestalozzi, J. (1805/1894). How gertrude teaches her children an attempt to help mothers to teach their children and an account of the method (L. Holland & F. Turner, Trans., pp. 1–256). London; Syracuse: Swann Sonnenschein
Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66(3), 212–224.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—Two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Retrieved from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor- Sjoberg- Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
Tobias, S. (2006). Letter to the editor. Physics Today, 59(7), 10.
van der Veen, J. (2006). Ethnic dance and physics: Correlations and possible implications for physics education (preprint). Retrieved December 15, 2014, from web. physics.ucsb.edu/~jatila/papers/Dance-and-Physics_Results.pdf
van der Veen, J. (2007, September). Symmetry and aesthetics in introductory physics: An experiment in interdisciplinary physics and fine arts education (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
van der Veen, J. (2012). Draw your physics homework? Art as a path to understanding in physics teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 356–407.
van der Veen, J. (2013). Symmetry as a thematic approach to physics education. Symmetry: Culture and Science, 24(1–4), 463–484.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zee, A. (1986, 1999, 2007). Fearful symmetry: The search for beauty in modern physics. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.