Skip to main content

Refractions of the Global Educational Agenda

Educational Possibilities in an Ambiguous Policy Terrain

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Professional Life and Work ((SPLW,volume 3))

Abstract

In this chapter, we present what we interpret as ambiguities in the Education for All (EFA) policy agenda (outlined below), and explore how neoliberal substructures influence the opportunity to embrace the negotiative spaces that ambiguous policies might offer. To investigate these dynamics, we have chosen to examine cultural and historical refractions of the EFA agenda in two very different cultural contexts – Norway, located in the Global North, and Nepal, located in the Global South.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acharya, P. (1996). Indigenous education and Brahminical hegemony in Bengal. In N. Crook (Ed.), The transmission of knowledge in South Asia; Essays on education, religion, history, and politics (pp. 98–118). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apple, M. W. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context (pp. 57–77). In N. C. (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York, NY: RoutledgeI.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Awasthi, L. D. (2004). Exploring monolingual school practices in multilingual Nepal (Doctor of Philosophy). Danish University of Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, U. (2009, October). World risk society and manufactured uncertainties. Iris, 1(2), 291–299. (Florence: Firenze University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatta, P. (2011). Aid agency influence in national education policy-making: A case from Nepal’s ‘Education for All’ movement. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biraimah, K. (2005). Achieving equitable outcomes or reinforcing societal inequalities? A critical analysis of UNESCO’s education for all and the United States’ No Child Left Behind Programs. Educational Practice and Theory, 27(2), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bista, D. B. (1991). Fatalism and development: Nepal’s struggle for modernization. Calcutta: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bista, M. (1999). Some issues confronting school reform in Nepal. Educational and Development, 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carney, S., & Rappleye, J. (2011). Education reform in Nepal: From modernity to conflict. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/14767724.2010.513274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2001). New public management i norsk statsforvaltning. In BS Tranøy et Ø. Østerud (Éd.), Den fragmenterte staten. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clemet, K. (2003). Utdanning for alle – Nasjonal plan for oppfølging av Dakarerklæringen. Government report by the Norwegian Minister of Education and Research. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kilde/ufd/rap/2003/0061/ddd/pdfv/187820-norsk_versjon_-nasjonal_efa-plan_-230903.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  13. CMEC. (2015). World Education Forum 2015 (WEF). In Council of Ministers of Education, Report of the Canadian delegation.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freire, P. (2008). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans., 4th ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein, H. (2004). Education for all: The globalization of learning targets. Comparative Education, 40(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodson, I. F. (2010). Times of educational change: Towards an understanding of patterns of historical and cultural refraction. Journal of Education Policy, 25(6), 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodson, I. F., & Rudd, T. (2012) Developing a concept of refraction: Exploring educational change and oppositional practice. Educational Practice and Theory, 34(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodson, I. F. (2015). The five Rs of educational research. Power and Education, 7(1), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hofvind, T. (2015). Fra profesjonsidealer til profesjonsetikk og profesjonsbevissthet. Bedre skole, (4).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen, A. R. (2010). Basil Bernsteins teori om pedagogiske identiteter brukt i skolepolitisk tekstanalyse. Universitetet i Agder, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K06. (2006). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet. [Oslo]: Kunnskapsdepartementet; Utdanningsdirektoratet.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lysne, A. (2004). Kampen om skolen. 1970–2000. Karakterer og kompetanse. Stridstema i norsk skolehistorie [The fight over school 1970–2000. Marks and competence. Controversies in Norwegian school history]. Haslum: AVA Forlag

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nes, K. (2004). Quality versus equality? Inclusion politics in Norway at century’s end. Ideology and the Politics of (In)Exclusion, 270, 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  26. OECD. (2015). Education policy outlook 2015: Making reforms happen. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/EPO%202015_Highlights.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pfaff-Czarnecka, J. (1997). Vestiges and visions: Cultural change in the process of nation-building in Nepal. In D. N. Gellner, J. Pfaff-Czarnecka, & J. Whelpton (Eds.), Nationalism and ethnicity in a Hindu Kingdom: The politics of culture in contemporary Nepal (pp. 419–470). Amsterdam: Hardwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ritivoi, A. D. (2010). Ricoeur and rethorical theory; Paul Ricoeur on recognition in the public sphere. In S. Davidson (Ed.), Ricoeur across the disciplines. London: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shields, R., & Rappleye, J. (2008). Differentiation, development,(dis) integration: Education in Nepal’s “People’s War”. Research in Comparative International Education, 3(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Telhaug, A. O., & Mediås, O. A. (2003). Grunnskolen som nasjonsbygger: fra statspietisme til nyliberalisme. Oslo: Abstrakt forl.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tranøy, B. (2014). New public paranoia. In N. Monsen & S. Østre (Eds.), Velferd, økonomi og olitikk; Festskrift til Bjarne Jensen 70 år den 6. mars 2014. Elverum: Høgskolen i Hedmark.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tveit, S. (2014). Educational assessment in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tønnessen, L. K. B. (2011). Norsk utdanningshistorie: en innføring med fokus på grunnskolens utvikling. Bergen: Fagbokforl.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Udir.no. (2011). Generell del av læreplanen. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://www.udir.no/Lareplaner/Kunnskapsloftet/Generell-del-av-lareplanen/

  35. UN. (2006a). Goals, targets and indicators. Millennium Project. Retrieved October 29, 2014, from http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/gti.htm#goal2

  36. UN. (2006b). The millennium project. Retrieved October 29, 2014, from http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/

  37. UN. (2014). Education for All (EFA). Resources for speakers on global issues. Retrieved October 29, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/briefingpapers/efa/

  38. Union of Education Norway. (2014). Styring og maktforskyvning i utdanningssektoren – om profesjonens handlingsrom og kollektive innflytelse. Et temanotat i en serie om styring og kvalitet. (6). Retrieved from https://www.utdanningsforbundet.no/upload/Publikasjoner/Temanotat/Temanotat%202014/Temanotat_2014_06_web.pdf

  39. UNESCO. (2005). Embracing diversity: Toolkit for creating inclusive learning-friendly environments. Introductory Booklet. Retrieved from http://www.unescobkk.org/education/inclusive-education/resources/ilfe-toolkit/

    Google Scholar 

  40. UNESCO. (2014). EFA Global monitoring reportc 2013/4; Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://en.unesco.org/gem-report/report/2014/teaching-and-learning-achieving-quality-all#sthash.uUcxnLKY.dpbs

    Google Scholar 

  41. UNESCO. (2015a). EFA global monitoring report (2000–2015); Achievements and challenges. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://en.unesco.org/gem-report/report/2015/education-all-2000-2015-achievements-and-challenges#sthash.Hyt3V3Oi.dpbs

    Google Scholar 

  42. UNESCO. (2015b, May). Five major regional conferences in the lead up to the world education forum. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/education-for-all/world-education-forum-2015/regional-conferences/

    Google Scholar 

  43. Verger, A., & Curran, M. (2014). New public management as a global education policy: its adoption and re-contextualization in a Southern European setting. Critical Studies in Education, 55(3), 253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Whelpton, J. (2005). A history of Nepal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stray, I.E., Voreland, H.E. (2017). Refractions of the Global Educational Agenda. In: Rudd, T., Goodson, I.F. (eds) Negotiating Neoliberalism. Studies in Professional Life and Work, vol 3. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-854-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-854-9_7

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-854-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics