Abstract
A common trend in high school science education is to adopt a context-based pedagogical approach (Pilot & Bulte, 2006). This approach has been chosen since it is expected to assist in creating more interest among students to pursue a scientific higher educational career (Gilbert, 2006). In this chapter we address the characteristics of a context-based learning environment in science (CBLES) from both the student and the teacher’s perspective and how we can measure these characteristics in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Chen, C. C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a crossnational study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37–55.
Artiles, A. J. (1996). Teacher thinking in urban schools. Teacher Thinking in Cultural Contexts, 23–52.
Bennett, J. (2003). Teaching and learning science. London: Continuum Press.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters’ approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999–1015.
Bennett, J., Gräsel, C., Parchmann, I., & Waddington, D. (2005). Context-based and conventional approaches to teaching chemistry: Comparing teachers’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1521–1547.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370.
Boersma, K. (Ed.). (1987). 10 jaar leerplanontwikkeling 1975–1985 [10 years of learning pathway development 1975–1985]. Enschede: Instituut voor leerplanontwikkeling.
Boersma, K., van Graft, M., Harteveld, A., de Hullu, E., de Knecht-van Eekelen, A., & Mazereeuw, M. (2007). Leerlijn biologie van 4 tot 18 jaar [A biology learning continuity pathway for K to 12]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CVBO. Retrieved from www.nibi.nl
Brannick, M. T. (1995). Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 201–213.
Commissie Vernieuwing Natuurkunde Onderwijs HAVO/VWO [Innovation committee high school physics education]. (2006). Natuurkunde leeft [Physics lives]. Retrieved from www.nieuwenatuurkunde.nl
De Putter-Smits, L. G. A., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Van Driel, J. (2011). De emphases van docenten biologie, natuurkunde en scheikunde en de gevolgen voor curriculum vernieuwingen [Science teachers’ emphases and consequences for curriculum innovations]. Tijdschrift voor Didactiek der bèta-wetenschappen, 28(1), 32–48.
De Putter-Smits, L. G. A., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2013). Mapping context-based learning environments: The construction of an instrument. Learning Environments Research, 16(3), 437–462.
den Brok, P., Bergen, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2006). Convergence and divergence between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of instructional behaviour in Dutch secondary education. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to reasearch on learning environments; worldviews (pp. 125–160). Singapore: World Scientific.
Dorman, J. P. (2003). Cross-national validation of the What is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environments Research, 6, 231–245.
Driessen, H., & Meinema, H. (2003). Chemie tussen context en concept: ontwerpen voor vernieuwing [Chemistry between context and concept: designing for innovation]. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO Stichting Leerplanontwikkeling. Retrieved from www.nieuwescheikunde.nl
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (No. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage publications.
Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Fullan, M. (1994). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Continuum Press.
Gilbert, J. (2006). On the nature of context in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.
Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (2002). Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.
Hondebrink, J. G. (1987). Vijftien jaar scheikunde (leer)plannen [15 years of chemistry (learning) pathways]. In K. Boersma (Ed.), 10 jaar leerplanontwikkeling 1975–1985 [10 years of learning pathway development 1975–1985] (pp. 47–56). Enschede: Instituut voor leerplanontwikkeling.
Hooymayers, H. P. (1986). In H. M. C. Eijkelhof, E. Holl, B. Pulepessy, A. E. van der Valk, P. A. J. Verhagen, & R. F. A. Wierstra (Eds.), Op weg naar vernieuwing van het natuurkundeonderwijs. Een verzameling artikelen ter gelegenheid van de afronding van het Project Leerpakketontwikkeling Natuurkunde [Towards Innovation of Physics Education. A Collection of Articles on the Occasion of the Finishing of the Project Curriculum Development Physics (PLON)] (pp. 23–36). ’s Gravenhage: SVO.
Johnson, B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7(1), 65–80.
Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759.
Labudde, P. (2008). The role of constructivism in science education: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Bruckmann (Eds.), Four decades in research of science education—From curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 139–156). Munster: Waxmann Verlag.
Lamberigts, R., & Bergen, T. (2000, April). Teaching for active learning using a constructivist approach. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LO.
Lucas, K., & Roth, W. M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student learning: Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 26, 103–127.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613.
Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062.
Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. (2006). The use of “contexts” as a challenge for chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087–1112.
Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of curriculum emphases in science education. Science Education, 66, 243–260.
Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-ended science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship model. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73–128.
Steering Committee NLT [Advanced Science, Mathematics and Technology]. (2008). Outline of a new subject in the sciences: A vision of an interdisciplinary subject: Advanced science, mathematics and technology. Enschede: SLO. Retrieved from www.nieuwbetavak-nlt.nl
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1997). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1993, April). Monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293–302.
Van Berkel, B. (2005). The structure of current school chemistry ( Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107–122.
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.
Waddington, D. J. (2005). Context-based learning in science education: A review. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context-based learning of science (pp. 305–321). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Putter-Smits, L.G.A.D., Taconis, R., Jochems, W.M.G. (2016). Measuring Context-Based Learning Environments in Dutch Science Classrooms. In: Taconis, R., Brok, P.d., Pilot, A. (eds) Teachers Creating Context-Based Learning Environments in Science. Advances in Learning Environments Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2_7
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-684-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)