Skip to main content

The Integration of Quality Management in Universities

An Analysis Based on Quality Policy Statements

  • Chapter
Global Challenges, National Initiatives, and Institutional Responses

Abstract

Theoretically, a more integrative vision of quality management (QM) practices is being proposed (Manatos, Sarrico, & Rosa, 2015), and universities seem to be in the process of following a path towards a stronger integration of their QM practices (Rosa & Amaral, 2007; Sousa & Voss, 2002; Srikanthan & Dalrymple, 2002, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A3ES. (2013a). Activity plan for 2013. Lisbon: A3ES.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A3ES. (2013b). Auditing internal quality assurance systems. Guidelines for the auditing report. Lisbon: A3ES.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Buckingham: Society Research for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berlin Communiqué. (2003). Realising the European higher education area. Berlin: Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso, S., Rosa, M., & Videira, P. (2015). On the road to regaining trust? The development of internal quality assurance systems in Portuguese higher education institutions. CHER 28th Annual Conference, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deem, R. (1998). ‘New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doherty, G. D. (2008). On quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(3), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duque, L. (2013). A framework for analysing HE performance: Students’ satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1–2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ENQA. (2009). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area (3rd ed.). Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Slipersæter, S., Stensaker, B., & Bótas, P. C. (2013). A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: Strategising pluralistic organisations in multiplex environments. Higher Education, 65, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO. (2012). Quality management principles. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO. (2015). Quality management principles. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kohoutek, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2014). Opening up the black box. In H. Eggins (Ed.), Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education (pp. 167–175). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manatos, M., Sarrico, C., & Rosa, M. (2015). The integration of quality management in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review (forthcoming). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–17. doi:10.1080/14783363.2015.1050180

    Google Scholar 

  20. Melo, A., Sarrico, C. S., & Radnor, Z. (2010). The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Management Review, 12(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodman, K., Biloslavo, R., & Bratož, S. (2013). Institutional quality of a higher education institution from the perspective of employers. Minerva, 51(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosa, M., & Amaral, A. (2007). A self-assessment of higher education institutions from the perspectives of EFQM model. In D. F. Westerheijden (Ed.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rosa, M., & Amaral, A. (2014). The Portuguese case: New public management reforms and the european standards and guidelines. In H. Eggins (Ed.), Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education (pp. 153–166). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosa, M., & Sarrico, C. S. (2012). Quality, evaluation and accreditation: From steering, through compliance, on to enhancement and innovation? In A. Amaral & G. Neave (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009. A nation, a generation (pp. 249–264). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosa, M., Saraiva, P. M., & Diz, H. (2001). The development of an excellence model for Portuguese higher education institutions. Total Quality Management, 12(7), 1010–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosa, M., Saraiva, P. M., & Diz, H. (2003). Excellence in Portuguese higher education institutions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(2), 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosa, M., Cardoso, S., Dias, D., & Alberto, A. (2011). The EUA institutional evaluation programme: An account of institutional best practices. Quality in Higher Education, 17(3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarrico, C. S., Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2013). Quality, management and governance in European higher education institutions. Journal of the Higher Education Area, 4, 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. (2002). Developing a holistic model for quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(3), 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. (2007). A conceptual overview of a holistic model for quality in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(3), 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tavares, O., Sin, C., & Amaral, A. (2015). Internal quality assurance systems in Portugal: What their strengths and weaknesses reveal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1064515

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). Multidimensional ranking: A new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Veiga, A., & Sarrico, C. S. (2014). Changes in governance: Do they help overcome barriers to the implementation of the European standards and guidelines for quality assurance in higher education? In H. Eggins (Ed.), Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education (pp. 67–81). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yeo, R., & Li, J. (2014). Beyond SERVQUAL: The competitive forces in higher education in Singapore. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(2), 95–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manatos, M.J., Sarrico, C.S., Rosa, M.J. (2016). The Integration of Quality Management in Universities. In: Sarrico, C., Teixeira, P., Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Rosa, M.J., Carvalho, T. (eds) Global Challenges, National Initiatives, and Institutional Responses. Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-675-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-675-0_8

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-675-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics