Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) have been associated with positive affect, and are perceived as motivational for students and teachers. Their multimedia capabilities have been reported to capture students’ attention and support the transition from concrete learning to more abstract concepts. Betcher and Lee (2009, p. 1) state that “Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) have the capacity to fundamentally change – and indeed revolutionise – the nature of teaching”.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
ACARA, T. A. C., Assessment and Reporting Authority (n.d.). Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
Allsopp, D. H., Colucci, K., Doone, E., Perez, L., Bryant, E. J., & Holhfeld, T. N. (2012). Interactive whiteboard technology for students with disabilities: A year long exploratory study. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(4), 1–15.
Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 455–467.
BECTA. (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Retrieved from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf
Bell, M. A. (2002). Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker's dozen reasons! Teachers.Net Gazette, 3(1). Retrieved from http://teachers.net/gazette/JAN02/mabell.html
Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.
Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 247–270.
Carter, A. (2002). Using interactive whiteboards with deaf children. Retrieved from http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/resources_ftp/client_ftp/teacher/ict/whiteboards/index.htm
Cogill, J. (2003). The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: Effects on pedagogy (16). Coventry: BECTA.
Coyle, V., Yan, L., & Verdu, M. (2010). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on the teacher and children’s language use in an ESL immersion classroom. System, 38(4), 614–625. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X1000117X
Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the english language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers and Education, 51, 1553–1568.
de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2004). Paying attention to attention: New economies for learning. Educational Theory, 54(4), 381–397.
Dugard, P., File, P., & Todman, J. (2012). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Egerton, J., Cook, J., & Stambolis, C. (2009). Developing a model of pedagogical best practice in the use of interactive whiteboards for children with autism and complex learning disabilities: Implications for initial teacher training. United Kingdom: Sunfield Research Organisation. Retrieved from http://sunfield.org.uk/pdf/TDA_project.pdf
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student Engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer –Verlag New York Inc.
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. H. (2003, 12–13 March). School engagement. Paper presented at the Indicators of Positive Development Conference, Child Trends, Washington, DC.
Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243256.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5–20.
Goldsmith, R. R., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2004). Use of technology in interventions for children with autism. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 1(2), 166–178.
Guthrie, J. T. D., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice: Overcoming learning difficulties. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59–85.
Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102–117.
Higgins, S. (2010). The impact of interactive whiteboards on classroom interaction and learning in primary schools in the UK. In M. Thomas & E. Cutrim Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for education : theory, research and practice (pp. 86–101). Hershey, PA: ICI Global.
Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H. J., & Wall, K. (2005). Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies. Retrieved from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/univ_newcastle_evaluation_whiteboards.pdf
Hodge, S., & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard: A teacher's journey. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 271–282.
Jamerson, J. (2002). Helping all children learn: Action research project. Smarter Kids Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper15.asp
Jones, R., Kervin, L., & McIntosh, S. (2011). The interactive whiteboard: Tool and/or agent of semiotic mediation. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 38–60.
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: Implications for affective computing. Paper presented at the Twenty fourth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, Florida.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227–241.
Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61–73.
Le Lant, C. (2015). The effect of interactive whiteboard use on the engagement of students with intellectual disability in early reading lessons. (PhD), Flinders University.
Learning Development Centre. (2008). Interactive whiteboards for students with special needs. Retrieved from http://www.learningplace.com.au/en/dssulc/ldcictswd
Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2012). Nonparametric statistical tests for single-case systematic and randomized ABAB…AB and alternating treatment intervention designs: New developments, new directions. Journal of School Psychology, 50(5), 599–624.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Retrieved from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm#top
Lovell, M. (2014). Interactive whiteboard use: Changes in teacher pedagogy in reading instruction in the primary grades. University of Alberta, Canada. Retrieved from http://era.library.ualberta.ca
Martin, S. (2007). Interactive whiteboards and talking books: A new approach to teaching children to write? Literacy, 41(1), 26–34.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2 ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D., Averis, D., Door, V., & Glover, D. (2005). How can the use of an interactive whiteboard enhance the nature of learning in secondary mathematics and modern foreign languages? Retrieved from https://content.ncetm.org.uk/itt/sec/KeelePGCEMaths2006/InteractiveWhiteboard&DataProj/Research/BectaReportMiller&co.pdf
Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2004). Enhancing mathematics teaching through new technology: The use of the interactive whiteboard. Retrieved from http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/docs/NuffieldReport.pdf
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environment. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.
Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaaic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) project: London challenge. Research report RR816. UK Institute of Education, Dept. for Education and Skills. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eorderingdownload/rr816%20report.pdf
Murcia, K. (2014). Interactive and multimodal pedagogy: A case study of how teachers and students use interactive whiteboard technology in primary science. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 74–88.
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39) Columbia: Teachers College Press.
Pennington, R. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(4), 239–248.
Sakar, A., & Ercetin, G. (2005). Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 28–38.
Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametllera, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Castro, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and valuation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33.
Slay, H., Sieborger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? Computers and Education, 51, 1321–1341.
Smith, H. (2001). SmartBoard evaluation: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.kented.org.uk/ngfl/ict/IWB/whiteboards/report.html#top
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101.
Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Steadman, S., Scrimshaw, P., . . . Woodrow, D. (2007). Evaluation of the primary schools Whiteboard Expansion Project. Retrieved from http://www.becta.org.uk/research
Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2007). Learning from children about their learning with and without ICT using video-stimulated reflective dialogue. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp. 708–716). Melbourne: MERGA Inc.
Whitby, P. J. S., Leininger, M. L., & Grillo, K. (2012). Tips for using interactive whiteboards to increase participation of students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 50–57.
Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Hammond, D. (2010). Comparative intervention designs. In D. L. Gast (Ed.). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 329–381). New York: Routledge.
Yakubova, G., & Taber-Doughty, T. (2013). Brief report: Learning via the electronic interactive whiteboard for two students with autism and a student with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1465–1472.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lant, C.L., Lawson, M.J. (2016). Interactive Whiteboard Use and Student Engagement. In: Orrell, J., Curtis, D.D. (eds) Publishing Higher Degree Research. Higher Education Horizons. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-672-9_4
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-672-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)